Literature DB >> 18186678

Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upper-ureteral stones.

Shivadeo S Bapat1, Ketan V Pai, Satyajeet S Purnapatre, Pushkaraj B Yadav, Abhijit S Padye.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the success rates and complications of Lithoclast and holmium laser-assisted ureterorenoscopy (URS) in managing upper-ureteral stones.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 394 patients with upper-ureteral stone who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy at our institution from January 2000 to December 2005. In 193 patients (mean stone size 12.3 mm), pneumatic lithotripsy was used; in 201 patients (mean stone size 11.5 mm), laser lithotripsy was performed. Patients were monitored as outpatients at 2 weeks, at 3 months, and then annually with a kidneys, ureters, and bladder radiograph and ultrasonography. Patients with migrated stones or incomplete clearance underwent an auxiliary procedure such as shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or repeated URS. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 24 months.
RESULTS: Fragmentation of stones to fine pieces that pass eventually was assessed at 2 weeks. This did not include proximal migration of a stone or fragments that required auxiliary treatment. This occurred in 166/193 (86.01%) patients in the Lithoclast group and in 195/201 (97.01%) in the laser group. Ureteral perforations were nine in the Lithoclast group and six in the laser group. Auxiliary procedures included SWL (27/193 [13.98%] patients in the Lithoclast group and 4/201 [1.99%] patients in the laser group) or repeated URS (two in the Lithoclast group). Urosepsis after URS occurred in 11/193 patients in the Lithoclast group and 5/201 patients in the laser group.
CONCLUSION: In our study, the fragmentation rates of holmium laser-assisted ureteroscopy were significantly better in the upper ureter. The complications and the need for auxiliary procedures were significantly less for holmium laser-assisted ureteroscopy when compared with pneumatic lithotripsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18186678     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  15 in total

1.  Value of focal applied energy quotient in treatment of ureteral lithiasis with shock waves.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo; Miguel Arrabal-Martin; Francisco Palao-Yago; Jose Luis Mijan-Ortiz; Armando Zuluaga-Gomez
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  Comparing the efficacy and safety of 365- and 550-μm laser fibers in semirigid ureteroscopic Ho:YAG lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Vladimir Yutkin; Constantinos A Constantinides; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Efficacy and safety of the Accordion stone-trapping device: in vitro results from an artificial ureterolithotripsy model.

Authors:  Peter Jochen Olbert; Christian Keil; Jost Weber; Andres J Schrader; Axel Hegele; Rainer Hofmann
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-11-27

5.  In-vitro assessment of a new portable ballistic lithotripter with percutaneous and ureteroscopic models.

Authors:  Agnes J Wang; Gregory T Baldwin; James C Gabriel; F Hadley Cocks; Zachariah G Goldsmith; Muhammad W Iqbal; Gaston M Astroza; W Neal Simmons; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger; Michael Eric Lipkin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Pneumatic versus laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparison of initial outcomes and cost.

Authors:  Aslan Demir; Mert Ali Karadağ; Kurşat Ceçen; Mehmet Uslu; Omer Erkam Arslan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Laser Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy With Semi-Rigid Ureteroscope; A Comparative Randomized Study.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammadreza Rabani; Seyedhossein Rabani; Najmeh Rashidi
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-06

8.  A comparison of efficacies of holmium YAG laser, and pneumatic lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones.

Authors:  Ekrem Akdeniz; Lokman İrkılata; Hüseyin Cihan Demirel; Acun Saylık; Mustafa Suat Bolat; Necmettin Şahinkaya; Mehmet Zengin; Mustafa Kemal Atilla
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-09

9.  Use of XenX™, the latest ureteric occlusion device with guide wire utility: results from a prospective multicentric comparative study.

Authors:  Francesco Sanguedolce; Emanuele Montanari; Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Nicola Macchione; Stephan Hruby; Athanasios Papatsoris; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Luca Villa; Patrick Honeck; Olivier Traxer; Francesco Greco
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using Swiss Lithoclast for treatment of ureteral calculi: 12-years experience.

Authors:  Young Kwon Hong; Dong Soo Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.