Literature DB >> 9679900

Holmium:YAG lithotripsy efficiency varies with energy density.

G J Vassar1, J M Teichman, R D Glickman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We test the hypothesis that holmium:YAG lithotripsy efficiency varies with optical fiber size and energy settings (energy density).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 272, 365, 550 and 940 microm. optical fibers delivered 1 kJ. total holmium:YAG energy to calcium oxalate monohydrate calculi at energy output/pulse of 0.2 to 1.5 J. Stone mass loss was measured for each fiber energy setting. Stone crater width was characterized for single energy pulses. Fiber energy outputs were compared before and after lithotripsy.
RESULTS: Stone mass loss correlated inversely with optical fiber diameter (p <0.05). Stone loss correlated with energy/pulse for the 365, 550 and 940 microm. fibers (p <0.001). The 272 and 365 microm. fibers yielded equivalent stone loss at 0.2 and 0.5 J. per pulse. At energies of 1.0 J. per pulse or greater the 272 microm. optical fiber was prone to damage, and yielded reduced energy output and stone loss compared to the 365 microm. fiber (p <0.01). Stone crater width for single pulse energies correlated with energy settings for all fibers (p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Lithotripsy efficiency with the holmium:YAG laser depends on pulse energy output and diameter of the optical delivery fiber, implying that lithotripsy efficiency correlates with energy density. The 365 microm. fiber is indicated for most lithotripsy applications. The 272 microm. fiber is susceptible to damage and inefficient energy transmission at energies of 1.0 J. per pulse or greater. The 272 microm. fiber is indicated at energies of less than 1.0 J. per pulse for small caliber ureteroscopes or when maximal flexible ureteroscope deflection is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9679900     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62927-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

1.  Comparing the efficacy and safety of 365- and 550-μm laser fibers in semirigid ureteroscopic Ho:YAG lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Vladimir Yutkin; Constantinos A Constantinides; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in non-contact mode: optimization of fiber to stone working distance to improve ablation efficiency.

Authors:  Vincent De Coninck; Etienne Xavier Keller; Paul Chiron; Laurian Dragos; Esteban Emiliani; Steeve Doizi; Laurent Berthe; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Role of lasers in urology.

Authors:  Stephan M Korn; Nicolai A Hübner; Christian Seitz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Harun Fajkovic
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Influence of saline on temperature profile of laser lithotripsy activation.

Authors:  Wilson R Molina; Igor N Silva; Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; Diedra Gustafson; David Sehrt; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Evaluation of 200 Mm, 365 Mm and 500 Mm Fibers of Ho:YAG Laser in Transurethral Lithotripsy of Ureteral: A Randomize Control Trial.

Authors:  Morteza Fallah Karkan; Saleh Ghiasy; Arash Ranjbar; Babak Javanmard
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-26

7.  Clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy using 365 μm holmium laser for nephrolithiasis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Pei Lu; Keliang Chen; Zijie Wang; Rijin Song; Jiexiu Zhang; Bianjiang Liu; Guohua Zeng; Zengjun Wang; Wei Zhang; Min Gu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Mechanisms of Pulse Modulated Holmium:YAG Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jason B King; Nitesh Katta; Joel M H Teichman; James W Tunnell; Thomas E Milner
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 9.  Generated temperatures and thermal laser damage during upper tract endourological procedures using the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser: a systematic review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Patrick Rice; Bhaskar Kumar Somani; Udo Nagele; Thomas R W Herrmann; Theodoros Tokas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  Comparison of Different Pulse Modulation Modes for Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Lithotripsy Ablation in a Benchtop Model.

Authors:  Russell S Terry; Derek S Ho; Dominick M Scialabba; Patrick S Whelan; Robert Qi; Brian T Ketterman; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.