PURPOSE: We test the hypothesis that holmium:YAG lithotripsy efficiency varies with optical fiber size and energy settings (energy density). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 272, 365, 550 and 940 microm. optical fibers delivered 1 kJ. total holmium:YAG energy to calcium oxalate monohydrate calculi at energy output/pulse of 0.2 to 1.5 J. Stone mass loss was measured for each fiber energy setting. Stone crater width was characterized for single energy pulses. Fiber energy outputs were compared before and after lithotripsy. RESULTS: Stone mass loss correlated inversely with optical fiber diameter (p <0.05). Stone loss correlated with energy/pulse for the 365, 550 and 940 microm. fibers (p <0.001). The 272 and 365 microm. fibers yielded equivalent stone loss at 0.2 and 0.5 J. per pulse. At energies of 1.0 J. per pulse or greater the 272 microm. optical fiber was prone to damage, and yielded reduced energy output and stone loss compared to the 365 microm. fiber (p <0.01). Stone crater width for single pulse energies correlated with energy settings for all fibers (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lithotripsy efficiency with the holmium:YAG laser depends on pulse energy output and diameter of the optical delivery fiber, implying that lithotripsy efficiency correlates with energy density. The 365 microm. fiber is indicated for most lithotripsy applications. The 272 microm. fiber is susceptible to damage and inefficient energy transmission at energies of 1.0 J. per pulse or greater. The 272 microm. fiber is indicated at energies of less than 1.0 J. per pulse for small caliber ureteroscopes or when maximal flexible ureteroscope deflection is required.
PURPOSE: We test the hypothesis that holmium:YAG lithotripsy efficiency varies with optical fiber size and energy settings (energy density). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 272, 365, 550 and 940 microm. optical fibers delivered 1 kJ. total holmium:YAG energy to calcium oxalate monohydrate calculi at energy output/pulse of 0.2 to 1.5 J. Stone mass loss was measured for each fiber energy setting. Stone crater width was characterized for single energy pulses. Fiber energy outputs were compared before and after lithotripsy. RESULTS: Stone mass loss correlated inversely with optical fiber diameter (p <0.05). Stone loss correlated with energy/pulse for the 365, 550 and 940 microm. fibers (p <0.001). The 272 and 365 microm. fibers yielded equivalent stone loss at 0.2 and 0.5 J. per pulse. At energies of 1.0 J. per pulse or greater the 272 microm. optical fiber was prone to damage, and yielded reduced energy output and stone loss compared to the 365 microm. fiber (p <0.01). Stone crater width for single pulse energies correlated with energy settings for all fibers (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lithotripsy efficiency with the holmium:YAG laser depends on pulse energy output and diameter of the optical delivery fiber, implying that lithotripsy efficiency correlates with energy density. The 365 microm. fiber is indicated for most lithotripsy applications. The 272 microm. fiber is susceptible to damage and inefficient energy transmission at energies of 1.0 J. per pulse or greater. The 272 microm. fiber is indicated at energies of less than 1.0 J. per pulse for small caliber ureteroscopes or when maximal flexible ureteroscope deflection is required.
Authors: Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Vladimir Yutkin; Constantinos A Constantinides; Mordechai Duvdevani Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Stephan M Korn; Nicolai A Hübner; Christian Seitz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Harun Fajkovic Journal: Photochem Photobiol Sci Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Wilson R Molina; Igor N Silva; Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; Diedra Gustafson; David Sehrt; Fernando J Kim Journal: J Endourol Date: 2014-10-10 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Patrick Rice; Bhaskar Kumar Somani; Udo Nagele; Thomas R W Herrmann; Theodoros Tokas Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Russell S Terry; Derek S Ho; Dominick M Scialabba; Patrick S Whelan; Robert Qi; Brian T Ketterman; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong; Michael E Lipkin Journal: J Endourol Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 2.619