Literature DB >> 17886276

A comparison of the FREDDY and holmium lasers during ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Jennifer Yates1, August Zabbo, Gyan Pareek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Two laser devices that are used today in endoscopic treatment of renal and ureteral calculi are the frequency-doubled double-pulse neodynium:YAG (FREDDY) and Holmium:YAG lasers. The mechanism of action of these lasers differs, thus conferring potentially different safety and efficacy profiles. The in vitro efficacy of these lasers in treating urinary stones has been explored, but to our knowledge no study compares the in vivo efficacy. The purpose of this study is to compare the stone-free and complication rates of the FREDDY and holmium lasers. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were included in the study (from January 2004 to September 2006) if they had adequate documentation of stone size and location, postoperative stone burden, and perioperative complications. Stone-free status was determined based on intraoperative findings and postoperative imaging. Complications included bleeding, ureteral perforation, any intraoperative event necessitating termination of the procedure, ureteral stricture, hydronephrosis, and admission to the hospital with a diagnosis related to the procedure.
RESULTS: Sixty patients with adequate follow-up were identified. Thirty patients were treated with FREDDY and 30 patients with Holmium laser. Fisher's exact test was employed for statistical analysis. There was no significant difference in the average stone size between the FREDDY and Holmium groups, which were 6.7 mm and 6.1 mm, respectively. Stone-free rates in the FREDDY and Holmium groups were 76.7% and 93.3%, respectively, P = 0.149. The complication rates were 17.4% in the FREDDY group and 10% in the Holmium group, P = 0.667.
CONCLUSION: The complication and stone-free rates did not significantly differ between the FREDDY and Holmium lasers, though there was a trend toward a higher stone-free rate and lower complication rate with the holmium laser. Holmium laser may be more effective than the FREDDY laser in fragmenting calcium oxalate monohydrate stones. The device and laser fiber costs were comparable. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17886276     DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  6 in total

1.  Sciaticum majus foramen and sciaticum minus foramen as the path of SWL in the supine position to treat distal ureteral stone.

Authors:  Jianlin Lu; Xizhao Sun; Lei He
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

2.  Comparing the efficacy and safety of 365- and 550-μm laser fibers in semirigid ureteroscopic Ho:YAG lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Vladimir Yutkin; Constantinos A Constantinides; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Lasers in percutaneous renal procedures.

Authors:  Nadya M Cinman; Sero Andonian; Arthur D Smith
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The evolution of lasers in urology.

Authors:  Amir Zarrabi; Andreas J Gross
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

5.  A review study to evaluate holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy with flexible ureteroscopy in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  Bulent Altay; Bulent Erkurt; Selami Albayrak
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 6.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter Alken
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.