Literature DB >> 26436603

Predicting non-familial major physical violent crime perpetration in the US Army from administrative data.

A J Rosellini1, J Monahan2, A E Street3, S G Heeringa4, E D Hill1, M Petukhova1, B Y Reis5, N A Sampson1, P Bliese6, M Schoenbaum7, M B Stein8, R J Ursano9, R C Kessler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although interventions exist to reduce violent crime, optimal implementation requires accurate targeting. We report the results of an attempt to develop an actuarial model using machine learning methods to predict future violent crimes among US Army soldiers.
METHOD: A consolidated administrative database for all 975 057 soldiers in the US Army in 2004-2009 was created in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS). Of these soldiers, 5771 committed a first founded major physical violent crime (murder-manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated arson, aggravated assault, robbery) over that time period. Temporally prior administrative records measuring socio-demographic, Army career, criminal justice, medical/pharmacy, and contextual variables were used to build an actuarial model for these crimes separately among men and women using machine learning methods (cross-validated stepwise regression, random forests, penalized regressions). The model was then validated in an independent 2011-2013 sample.
RESULTS: Key predictors were indicators of disadvantaged social/socioeconomic status, early career stage, prior crime, and mental disorder treatment. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.80-0.82 in 2004-2009 and 0.77 in the 2011-2013 validation sample. Of all administratively recorded crimes, 36.2-33.1% (male-female) were committed by the 5% of soldiers having the highest predicted risk in 2004-2009 and an even higher proportion (50.5%) in the 2011-2013 validation sample.
CONCLUSIONS: Although these results suggest that the models could be used to target soldiers at high risk of violent crime perpetration for preventive interventions, final implementation decisions would require further validation and weighing of predicted effectiveness against intervention costs and competing risks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actuarial model; crime perpetration; machine learning; military violence; physical violence; risk model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26436603      PMCID: PMC5111361          DOI: 10.1017/S0033291715001774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  36 in total

1.  An epidemiologic investigation of homicides at Fort Carson, Colorado: summary of findings.

Authors:  Amy M Millikan; Michael R Bell; M Shayne Gallaway; Maureen T Lagana; Anthony L Cox; Michael G Sweda
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 2.  Intimate partner violence among military veterans and active duty servicemen.

Authors:  Amy D Marshall; Jillian Panuzio; Casey T Taft
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-11

3.  The Army study to assess risk and resilience in servicemembers (Army STARRS).

Authors:  Robert J Ursano; Lisa J Colpe; Steven G Heeringa; Ronald C Kessler; Michael Schoenbaum; Murray B Stein
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.458

4.  Factors associated with physical aggression among US Army soldiers.

Authors:  Michael Shayne Gallaway; David S Fink; Amy M Millikan; Michael R Bell
Journal:  Aggress Behav       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.917

5.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  PTSD symptoms and family versus stranger violence in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

Authors:  Connor P Sullivan; Eric B Elbogen
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2013-05-06

7.  Screening for violence risk in military veterans: predictive validity of a brief clinical tool.

Authors:  Eric B Elbogen; Michelle Cueva; H Ryan Wagner; Shoba Sreenivasan; Mira Brancu; Jean C Beckham; Lynn Van Male
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Violent behaviour in U.K. military personnel returning home after deployment.

Authors:  D Macmanus; K Dean; M Al Bakir; A C Iversen; L Hull; T Fahy; S Wessely; N T Fear
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  General report & recommendations in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine 2012: white paper of the European Association for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine.

Authors:  Olga Golubnitschaja; Vincenzo Costigliola
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 10.  Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seena Fazel; Jay P Singh; Helen Doll; Martin Grann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-07-24
View more
  15 in total

1.  Developing a Risk Model to Target High-risk Preventive Interventions for Sexual Assault Victimization among Female U.S. Army Soldiers.

Authors:  Amy E Street; Anthony J Rosellini; Robert J Ursano; Steven G Heeringa; Eric D Hill; John Monahan; James A Naifeh; Maria V Petukhova; Ben Y Reis; Nancy A Sampson; Paul D Bliese; Murray B Stein; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-07-29

2.  Risk factors for concurrent suicidal ideation and violent impulses in military veterans.

Authors:  Eric B Elbogen; H Ryan Wagner; Nathan A Kimbrel; Mira Brancu; Jennifer Naylor; Robert Graziano; Eric Crawford
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2017-06-19

3.  Using administrative data to identify U.S. Army soldiers at high-risk of perpetrating minor violent crimes.

Authors:  Anthony J Rosellini; John Monahan; Amy E Street; Eric D Hill; Maria Petukhova; Ben Y Reis; Nancy A Sampson; David M Benedek; Paul Bliese; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Predicting Sexual Assault Perpetration in the U.S. Army Using Administrative Data.

Authors:  Anthony J Rosellini; John Monahan; Amy E Street; Maria V Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; David M Benedek; Paul Bliese; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Aggression, Impulsivity, and History of Other- and Self-Directed Aggression.

Authors:  Caterina Mosti; Emil F Coccaro
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.198

6.  Using self-report surveys at the beginning of service to develop multi-outcome risk models for new soldiers in the U.S. Army.

Authors:  A J Rosellini; M B Stein; D M Benedek; P D Bliese; W T Chiu; I Hwang; J Monahan; M K Nock; M V Petukhova; N A Sampson; A E Street; A M Zaslavsky; R J Ursano; R C Kessler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 7.  [Interpersonal violence in the context of affective and psychotic disorders].

Authors:  W Maier; I Hauth; M Berger; H Saß
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Risk Factors Associated With Attempted Suicide Among US Army Soldiers Without a History of Mental Health Diagnosis.

Authors:  Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler; James A Naifeh; Holly B Herberman Mash; Matthew K Nock; Pablo A Aliaga; Carol S Fullerton; Gary H Wynn; Tsz Hin H Ng; Hieu M Dinh; Nancy A Sampson; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Steven G Heeringa; Murray B Stein
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.596

9.  Pre-deployment predictors of suicide attempt during and after combat deployment: Results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers.

Authors:  Kelly L Zuromski; Samantha L Bernecker; Carol Chu; Chelsey R Wilks; Peter M Gutierrez; Thomas E Joiner; Howard Liu; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  Extremism, religion and psychiatric morbidity in a population-based sample of young men.

Authors:  Jeremy W Coid; Kamaldeep Bhui; Deirdre MacManus; Constantinos Kallis; Paul Bebbington; Simone Ullrich
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 9.319

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.