Literature DB >> 28818420

Predicting Sexual Assault Perpetration in the U.S. Army Using Administrative Data.

Anthony J Rosellini1, John Monahan2, Amy E Street3, Maria V Petukhova4, Nancy A Sampson4, David M Benedek5, Paul Bliese6, Murray B Stein7, Robert J Ursano5, Ronald C Kessler8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Department of Defense uses a universal prevention framework for sexual assault prevention, with each branch implementing its own branch-wide programs. Intensive interventions exist, but would be cost effective only if targeted at high-risk personnel. This study developed actuarial models to identify male U.S. Army soldiers at high risk of administratively recorded sexual assault perpetration.
METHODS: This study investigated administratively recorded sexual assault perpetration among the 821,807 male Army soldiers serving 2004-2009. Administrative data were also used to operationalize the predictors. Penalized discrete-time (person-month) survival analysis (conducted in 2016) was used to select the smallest possible number of stable predictors to maximize number of sexual assaults among the 5% of soldiers with highest predicted risk of perpetration (top-ventile concentration of risk). Separate models were developed for assaults against non-family and intra-family adults and minors.
RESULTS: There were 4,640 male soldiers found to be perpetrators against non-family adults, 1,384 against non-family minors, 380 against intra-family adults, and 335 against intra-family minors. Top-ventile concentration of risk was 16.2%-20.2% predicting perpetration against non-family adults and minors and 34.2%-65.1% against intra-family adults and minors. Final predictors consisted largely of measures of prior crime involvement and the presence and treatment of mental disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: Administrative data can be used to develop actuarial models that identify a high proportion of sexual assault perpetrators. If a system is developed to consolidate administrative predictors routinely, then predictions could be generated periodically to identify those in need of preventive intervention. Whether this would be cost effective, though, would depend on intervention costs, effectiveness, and competing risks.
Copyright © 2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28818420      PMCID: PMC5683072          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  33 in total

1.  Shifting Boundaries: an experimental evaluation of a dating violence prevention program in middle schools.

Authors:  Bruce G Taylor; Nan D Stein; Elizabeth A Mumford; Daniel Woods
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-02

2.  Violent behaviour and post-traumatic stress disorder in US Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

Authors:  Eric B Elbogen; Sally C Johnson; H Ryan Wagner; Connor Sullivan; Casey T Taft; Jean C Beckham
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 9.319

3.  Reporting sexual assault in the military: who reports and why most servicewomen don't.

Authors:  Michelle A Mengeling; Brenda M Booth; James C Torner; Anne G Sadler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  The Army study to assess risk and resilience in servicemembers (Army STARRS).

Authors:  Robert J Ursano; Lisa J Colpe; Steven G Heeringa; Ronald C Kessler; Michael Schoenbaum; Murray B Stein
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.458

5.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  Recidivism risk factors are correlated with a history of psychiatric hospitalization among sex offenders.

Authors:  Seung C Lee; R Karl Hanson
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2016-08

7.  PTSD symptoms and family versus stranger violence in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

Authors:  Connor P Sullivan; Eric B Elbogen
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2013-05-06

8.  Screening for violence risk in military veterans: predictive validity of a brief clinical tool.

Authors:  Eric B Elbogen; Michelle Cueva; H Ryan Wagner; Shoba Sreenivasan; Mira Brancu; Jean C Beckham; Lynn Van Male
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Violent behaviour in U.K. military personnel returning home after deployment.

Authors:  D Macmanus; K Dean; M Al Bakir; A C Iversen; L Hull; T Fahy; S Wessely; N T Fear
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  General report & recommendations in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine 2012: white paper of the European Association for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine.

Authors:  Olga Golubnitschaja; Vincenzo Costigliola
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.543

View more
  6 in total

1.  A Machine Learning Approach to Identify NIH-Funded Applied Prevention Research.

Authors:  Jennifer Villani; Sheri D Schully; Payam Meyer; Ranell L Myles; Jocelyn A Lee; David M Murray; Ashley J Vargas
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Risk Factors Associated With Attempted Suicide Among US Army Soldiers Without a History of Mental Health Diagnosis.

Authors:  Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler; James A Naifeh; Holly B Herberman Mash; Matthew K Nock; Pablo A Aliaga; Carol S Fullerton; Gary H Wynn; Tsz Hin H Ng; Hieu M Dinh; Nancy A Sampson; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Steven G Heeringa; Murray B Stein
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  Pre-deployment predictors of suicide attempt during and after combat deployment: Results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers.

Authors:  Kelly L Zuromski; Samantha L Bernecker; Carol Chu; Chelsey R Wilks; Peter M Gutierrez; Thomas E Joiner; Howard Liu; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Caring for Service Members Who Have Been Sexually Assaulted: The Military Health System.

Authors:  Amanda L Murray; Tracey Perez Koehlmoos; Amanda Banaag; Natasha A Schvey
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 1.563

5.  Improving risk prediction accuracy for new soldiers in the U.S. Army by adding self-report survey data to administrative data.

Authors:  Samantha L Bernecker; Anthony J Rosellini; Matthew K Nock; Wai Tat Chiu; Peter M Gutierrez; Irving Hwang; Thomas E Joiner; James A Naifeh; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 6.  The Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS): progress toward understanding suicide among soldiers.

Authors:  James A Naifeh; Holly B Herberman Mash; Murray B Stein; Carol S Fullerton; Ronald C Kessler; Robert J Ursano
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 15.992

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.