Literature DB >> 27741501

Using administrative data to identify U.S. Army soldiers at high-risk of perpetrating minor violent crimes.

Anthony J Rosellini1, John Monahan2, Amy E Street3, Eric D Hill1, Maria Petukhova1, Ben Y Reis4, Nancy A Sampson1, David M Benedek5, Paul Bliese6, Murray B Stein7, Robert J Ursano5, Ronald C Kessler8.   

Abstract

Growing concerns exist about violent crimes perpetrated by U.S. military personnel. Although interventions exist to reduce violent crimes in high-risk populations, optimal implementation requires evidence-based targeting. The goal of the current study was to use machine learning methods (stepwise and penalized regression; random forests) to develop models to predict minor violent crime perpetration among U.S. Army soldiers. Predictors were abstracted from administrative data available for all 975,057 soldiers in the U.S. Army 2004-2009, among whom 25,966 men and 2728 women committed a first founded minor violent crime (simple assault, blackmail-extortion-intimidation, rioting, harassment). Temporally prior administrative records measuring socio-demographic, Army career, criminal justice, medical/pharmacy, and contextual variables were used to build separate male and female prediction models that were then tested in an independent 2011-2013 sample. Final model predictors included young age, low education, early career stage, prior crime involvement, and outpatient treatment for diverse emotional and substance use problems. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.79 (for men and women) in the 2004-2009 training sample and 0.74-0.82 (men-women) in the 2011-2013 test sample. 30.5-28.9% (men-women) of all administratively-recorded crimes in 2004-2009 were committed by the 5% of soldiers having highest predicted risk, with similar proportions (28.5-29.0%) when the 2004-2009 coefficients were applied to the 2011-2013 test sample. These results suggest that it may be possible to target soldiers at high-risk of violence perpetration for preventive interventions, although final decisions about such interventions would require weighing predicted effectiveness against intervention costs and competing risks. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crime perpetration; Military violence; Prediction model; Risk model; Violence prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27741501      PMCID: PMC5125854          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  36 in total

Review 1.  Intimate partner violence among military veterans and active duty servicemen.

Authors:  Amy D Marshall; Jillian Panuzio; Casey T Taft
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-11

2.  Stress, mental health, and job performance among active duty military personnel: findings from the 2002 Department of Defense Health-Related Behaviors Survey.

Authors:  Laurel L Hourani; Thomas V Williams; Amii M Kress
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  The Army study to assess risk and resilience in servicemembers (Army STARRS).

Authors:  Robert J Ursano; Lisa J Colpe; Steven G Heeringa; Ronald C Kessler; Michael Schoenbaum; Murray B Stein
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.458

4.  Factors associated with physical aggression among US Army soldiers.

Authors:  Michael Shayne Gallaway; David S Fink; Amy M Millikan; Michael R Bell
Journal:  Aggress Behav       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.917

5.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  Job strain, rank, and mental health in the UK Armed Forces.

Authors:  Nicola Townsend Fear; G James Rubin; Stephani Hatch; Lisa Hull; Margaret Jones; Matthew Hotopf; Simon Wessely; Roberto J Rona
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep

7.  PTSD symptoms and family versus stranger violence in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

Authors:  Connor P Sullivan; Eric B Elbogen
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2013-05-06

8.  Screening for violence risk in military veterans: predictive validity of a brief clinical tool.

Authors:  Eric B Elbogen; Michelle Cueva; H Ryan Wagner; Shoba Sreenivasan; Mira Brancu; Jean C Beckham; Lynn Van Male
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Violent behaviour in U.K. military personnel returning home after deployment.

Authors:  D Macmanus; K Dean; M Al Bakir; A C Iversen; L Hull; T Fahy; S Wessely; N T Fear
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  General report & recommendations in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine 2012: white paper of the European Association for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine.

Authors:  Olga Golubnitschaja; Vincenzo Costigliola
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.543

View more
  6 in total

1.  Prediction of Sex-Specific Suicide Risk Using Machine Learning and Single-Payer Health Care Registry Data From Denmark.

Authors:  Jaimie L Gradus; Anthony J Rosellini; Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó; Amy E Street; Isaac Galatzer-Levy; Tammy Jiang; Timothy L Lash; Henrik T Sørensen
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 21.596

2.  Predicting Sexual Assault Perpetration in the U.S. Army Using Administrative Data.

Authors:  Anthony J Rosellini; John Monahan; Amy E Street; Maria V Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; David M Benedek; Paul Bliese; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Risk Factors Associated With Attempted Suicide Among US Army Soldiers Without a History of Mental Health Diagnosis.

Authors:  Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler; James A Naifeh; Holly B Herberman Mash; Matthew K Nock; Pablo A Aliaga; Carol S Fullerton; Gary H Wynn; Tsz Hin H Ng; Hieu M Dinh; Nancy A Sampson; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Steven G Heeringa; Murray B Stein
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.596

4.  Predicting Sex-Specific Nonfatal Suicide Attempt Risk Using Machine Learning and Data From Danish National Registries.

Authors:  Jaimie L Gradus; Anthony J Rosellini; Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó; Tammy Jiang; Amy E Street; Isaac Galatzer-Levy; Timothy L Lash; Henrik T Sørensen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Improving risk prediction accuracy for new soldiers in the U.S. Army by adding self-report survey data to administrative data.

Authors:  Samantha L Bernecker; Anthony J Rosellini; Matthew K Nock; Wai Tat Chiu; Peter M Gutierrez; Irving Hwang; Thomas E Joiner; James A Naifeh; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 6.  The Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS): progress toward understanding suicide among soldiers.

Authors:  James A Naifeh; Holly B Herberman Mash; Murray B Stein; Carol S Fullerton; Ronald C Kessler; Robert J Ursano
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 15.992

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.