Kelly L Zuromski1, Samantha L Bernecker1, Carol Chu1, Chelsey R Wilks1, Peter M Gutierrez2, Thomas E Joiner3, Howard Liu4, James A Naifeh5, Matthew K Nock6, Nancy A Sampson4, Alan M Zaslavsky4, Murray B Stein7, Robert J Ursano5, Ronald C Kessler8. 1. Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA. 4. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University School of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA. 6. Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. 7. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 8. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: kessler@hcp.med.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deployment-related experiences might be risk factors for soldier suicides, in which case identification of vulnerable soldiers before deployment could inform preventive efforts. We investigated this possibility by using pre-deployment survey and administrative data in a sample of US Army soldiers to develop a risk model for suicide attempt (SA) during and shortly after deployment. METHODS: Data came from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers Pre-Post Deployment Survey (PPDS). Soldiers completed a baseline survey shortly before deploying to Afghanistan in 2011-2012. Survey measures were used to predict SAs, defined using administrative and subsequent survey data, through 30 months after deployment. Models were built using penalized regression and ensemble machine learning methods. RESULTS: Significant pre-deployment risk factors were history of traumatic brain injury, 9 + mental health treatment visits in the 12 months before deployment, young age, female, previously married, and low relationship quality. Cross-validated AUC of the best penalized and ensemble models were .75-.77. 21.3-40.4% of SAs occurred among the 5-10% of soldiers with highest predicted risk and positive predictive value (PPV) among these high-risk soldiers was 4.4-5.7%. CONCLUSIONS: SA can be predicted significantly from pre-deployment data, but intervention planning needs to take PPV into consideration.
BACKGROUND: Deployment-related experiences might be risk factors for soldier suicides, in which case identification of vulnerable soldiers before deployment could inform preventive efforts. We investigated this possibility by using pre-deployment survey and administrative data in a sample of US Army soldiers to develop a risk model for suicide attempt (SA) during and shortly after deployment. METHODS: Data came from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers Pre-Post Deployment Survey (PPDS). Soldiers completed a baseline survey shortly before deploying to Afghanistan in 2011-2012. Survey measures were used to predict SAs, defined using administrative and subsequent survey data, through 30 months after deployment. Models were built using penalized regression and ensemble machine learning methods. RESULTS: Significant pre-deployment risk factors were history of traumatic brain injury, 9 + mental health treatment visits in the 12 months before deployment, young age, female, previously married, and low relationship quality. Cross-validated AUC of the best penalized and ensemble models were .75-.77. 21.3-40.4% of SAs occurred among the 5-10% of soldiers with highest predicted risk and positive predictive value (PPV) among these high-risk soldiers was 4.4-5.7%. CONCLUSIONS: SA can be predicted significantly from pre-deployment data, but intervention planning needs to take PPV into consideration.
Authors: Mark A Reger; Derek J Smolenski; Nancy A Skopp; Melinda J Metzger-Abamukang; Han K Kang; Tim A Bullman; Sondra Perdue; Gregory A Gahm Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Craig J Bryan; James E Griffith; Brian T Pace; Kent Hinkson; AnnaBelle O Bryan; Tracy A Clemans; Zac E Imel Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2015-04-08
Authors: Murray B Stein; Erin B Ware; Colter Mitchell; Chia-Yen Chen; Susan Borja; Tianxi Cai; Catherine L Dempsey; Carol S Fullerton; Joel Gelernter; Steven G Heeringa; Sonia Jain; Ronald C Kessler; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Stephan Ripke; Xiaoying Sun; Jean C Beckham; Nathan A Kimbrel; Robert J Ursano; Jordan W Smoller Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Cynthia A LeardMann; Teresa M Powell; Tyler C Smith; Michael R Bell; Besa Smith; Edward J Boyko; Tomoko I Hooper; Gary D Gackstetter; Mark Ghamsary; Charles W Hoge Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler; James A Naifeh; Holly Herberman Mash; Carol S Fullerton; Pablo A Aliaga; Gary H Wynn; Tsz Hin H Ng; Hieu M Dinh; Nancy A Sampson; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Paul D Bliese; Murray B Stein Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: A B Niculescu; H Le-Niculescu; D F Levey; P L Phalen; H L Dainton; K Roseberry; E M Niculescu; J O Niezer; A Williams; D L Graham; T J Jones; V Venugopal; A Ballew; M Yard; T Gelbart; S M Kurian; A Shekhar; N J Schork; G E Sandusky; D R Salomon Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 15.992