Literature DB >> 26433557

Social Media and Oncology: The Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Communication Between Physician and Patient.

Mark A Lewis1, Adam P Dicker2.   

Abstract

The relationship between patient and physician is in flux with the advent of electronic media that are advancing and enhancing communication. We perform a retrospective, current, and forward-looking examination of the technologies by which information is exchanged within the healthcare community. The evolution from e-mail and listservs to blogs and the modern social networks is described, with emphasis on the advantages and pitfalls of each medium, especially in regard to maintaining the standards of privacy and professionalism to which doctors are held accountable. We support the use of contemporary platforms like Twitter and Facebook for physicians to establish themselves as trustworthy online sources of medical knowledge, and anticipate ongoing collaboration between researchers, patients, and their advocates in trial design and accrual.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26433557      PMCID: PMC4699327          DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2015.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  22 in total

1.  Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm.

Authors:  Paul Wicks; Timothy E Vaughan; Michael P Massagli; James Heywood
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Practicing in partnership with Dr. Google: the growing effect of social media in oncology practice and research.

Authors:  Howard Jack West
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-06-28

3.  Cancer talk on twitter: community structure and information sources in breast and prostate cancer social networks.

Authors:  Itai Himelboim; Jeong Yeob Han
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-10-10

4.  Practical guidance: the use of social media in oncology practice.

Authors:  Don S Dizon; David Graham; Michael A Thompson; Lisa J Johnson; Claire Johnston; Michael J Fisch; Robert Miller
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinic-Patient Electronic Mail.

Authors:  B Kane; D Z Sands
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Patrina H Y Caldwell; Sana Hamilton; Alvin Tan; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  A survey of patient access to electronic mail: attitudes, barriers, and opportunities.

Authors:  D B Fridsma; P Ford; R Altman
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

Review 8.  The Internet: friend or foe when providing patient education?

Authors:  Amy Shelton Anderson; Paula Klemm
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.027

9.  Use of email in a family practice setting: opportunities and challenges in patient- and physician-initiated communication.

Authors:  Ayaz Virji; Kimberly S H Yarnall; Katrina M Krause; Kathryn I Pollak; Margaret A Scannell; Margaret Gradison; Truls Østbye
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012.

Authors:  Emily Kontos; Kelly D Blake; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Abby Prestin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  16 in total

1.  How Twitter has connected the colorectal community.

Authors:  H J Logghe; G Pellino; R Brady; A S McCoubrey; S Atallah
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Social Media and Internet Resources for Patients with Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm (BPDCN).

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Vikas Gupta; Michael A Thompson; Andrew A Lane
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 3.  Twitter Use in the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Community.

Authors:  Sagar S Patel; Navneet S Majhail
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.952

4.  Incorporating Digital Tools to Improve Clinical Trial Infrastructure: A White Paper From the Digital Engagement Committee of SWOG.

Authors:  Don S Dizon; Mina S Sedrak; Mark A Lewis; Elise Cook; Michael J Fisch; Jennifer R Klemp; Jonathan Sommers; AnneMarie Ciccarella; Julie Gralow; Wendy Lawton; Craig Nichols
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

5.  Cancer-Related Internet Use and Online Social Networking Among Patients in an Early-Phase Clinical Trials Clinic at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Goldy C George; Adrianna Buford; Kenneth Hess; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Ralph Zinner; Vivek Subbiah; Christina Hinojosa; Charles S Cleeland; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Elmer V Bernstam; David S Hong
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

6.  Communicating About Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Daniel C McFarland; Elizabeth Blackler; Smita Banerjee; Jimmie Holland
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-08-07

7.  Analysis of the Use and Impact of Twitter During American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meetings From 2011 to 2016: Focus on Advanced Metrics and User Trends.

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Michael A Thompson; Ruben A Mesa; Tejas Desai
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 8.  Risks and benefits of Twitter use by hematologists/oncologists in the era of digital medicine.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Patricia F Anderson; Michael J Fisch; David L Graham; Matthew S Katz; Jennifer Kesselheim; Merry Jennifer Markham; Nathan A Pennell; Mina S Sedrak; Michael A Thompson; Audun Utengen; Don S Dizon
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 9.  The use and impact of Twitter at medical conferences: Best practices and Twitter etiquette.

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Ruben A Mesa; Navneet S Majhail; Michael A Thompson
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 10.  Using Social Media at National Meetings in Hematology-Optimal Use, Tips, Strategies, and Limitations.

Authors:  Aaron C Logan
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.