Literature DB >> 23277774

Practical guidance: the use of social media in oncology practice.

Don S Dizon1, David Graham, Michael A Thompson, Lisa J Johnson, Claire Johnston, Michael J Fisch, Robert Miller.   

Abstract

The penetration of social media into modern society has become a worldwide cultural phenomenon. Social media use widely accessible Web-based and mobile technologies to facilitate the creation and sharing of user-generated content in a collaborative and social manner. The uptake of social media in medicine provides new opportunities for health care professionals and institutions to interact with patients and other professionals. Oncologists may use social media as a platform for patient education and authoritative health messaging, for professional development and knowledge sharing, and for direct patient interaction, although this may be fraught with important legal and privacy concerns. In this article, a working group of the ASCO Integrated Media and Technology Committee explores how oncologists might responsibly use social media in their professional lives. Existing social media policies from hospitals, health systems, and pharmaceutical industries are examined to identify common concepts informing the development of future guidelines. Key principles identified include establishing institutional ownership of social media activities and safeguarding protected health information. Furthermore, oncologists must not confuse the roles of provider of information and provider of care, must understand regulations related to state licensure and medical records, and must recognize the importance of transparency and disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. social media may be particularly useful for raising the awareness of and recruitment to clinical trials, but compliance with federal and state regulations and areas under the purview of a local institutional review board must also be ensured. Examples of constructive use of social media in oncology with Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23277774      PMCID: PMC3439237          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  4 in total

1.  Physicians on Twitter.

Authors:  Katherine C Chretien; Justin Azar; Terry Kind
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Trends in twitter use by physicians at the american society of clinical oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011.

Authors:  Aafia Chaudhry; L Michael Glodé; Matt Gillman; Robert S Miller
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Gabriel T Bosslet; Alexia M Torke; Susan E Hickman; Colin L Terry; Paul R Helft
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Patrina H Y Caldwell; Sana Hamilton; Alvin Tan; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 11.069

  4 in total
  41 in total

1.  YouTube as a source of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a social media content analysis.

Authors:  Michael Stellefson; Beth Chaney; Kathleen Ochipa; Don Chaney; Zeerak Haider; Bruce Hanik; Enmanuel Chavarria; Jay M Bernhardt
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.444

Review 2.  Barriers to accrual and enrollment in brain tumor trials.

Authors:  Eudocia Q Lee; Ugonma N Chukwueke; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; John F de Groot; Jose Pablo Leone; Terri S Armstrong; Susan M Chang; David Arons; Kathy Oliver; Kay Verble; Al Musella; Nicole Willmarth; Brian M Alexander; Amanda Bates; Lisa Doherty; Evanthia Galanis; Sarah Gaffey; Thomas Halkin; Bret E Friday; Maryam Fouladi; Nancy U Lin; David Macdonald; Minesh P Mehta; Marta Penas-Prado; Michael A Vogelbaum; Solmaz Sahebjam; David Sandak; Martin van den Bent; Michael Weller; David A Reardon; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  The risks and benefits of social media in dental foundation training.

Authors:  S Bhola; P Hellyer
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  HARNESSING SOCIAL MEDIA FOR HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.

Authors:  Lina Zhou; Dongsong Zhang; Chris Yang; Yu Wang
Journal:  Electron Commer Res Appl       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 6.014

Review 5.  Integrating Social Media into Urologic Health care: What Can We Learn from Other Disciplines?

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Hendrik Borgmann; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices.

Authors:  C Lee Ventola
Journal:  P T       Date:  2014-07

7.  Clinical Trials in the Era of Digital Engagement: A SWOG Call to Action.

Authors:  Krishna S Gunturu; Don S Dizon; Judy Johnson; Anne Marie Mercurio; Ginny Mason; Dana B Sparks; Wendy Lawton; Jennifer R Klemp
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-03

Review 8.  Social Media and Oncology: The Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Communication Between Physician and Patient.

Authors:  Mark A Lewis; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 9.  Twitter Use in the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Community.

Authors:  Sagar S Patel; Navneet S Majhail
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.952

10.  Analysis of the Use and Impact of Twitter During American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meetings From 2011 to 2016: Focus on Advanced Metrics and User Trends.

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Michael A Thompson; Ruben A Mesa; Tejas Desai
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.