Literature DB >> 29153078

The use and impact of Twitter at medical conferences: Best practices and Twitter etiquette.

Naveen Pemmaraju1, Ruben A Mesa2, Navneet S Majhail3, Michael A Thompson4.   

Abstract

The use of social media, and in particular, Twitter, for professional use among healthcare providers is rapidly increasing across the world. One medical subspecialty that is leading the integration of this new platform for communication into daily practice and for information dissemination to the general public is the field of hematology/oncology. A growing amount of research in this area demonstrates that there is increasing interest among physicians to learn not only how to use social media for consumption of educational material, but also how to generate and contribute original content in one's interest/expert areas. One aspect in which this phenomenon has been highlighted is at the time of maximum new information presentation: at a major medical conference. Hematologists/oncologists are engaging regularly in one of the most common forms of social media, Twitter, during major medical conferences, for purposes of debate, discussion, and real-time evaluation of the data being presented. As interest has grown in this area, this article aims to review the new norms, practices, and impact of using Twitter at the time of medical conferences, and also explores some of the barriers and pitfalls that users are encountering in this emerging field.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease-specific hashtag; Medical conferences; Social media; Twitter

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29153078      PMCID: PMC8148883          DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2017.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hematol        ISSN: 0037-1963            Impact factor:   3.851


  27 in total

Review 1.  Social Media and Internet Resources for Patients with Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm (BPDCN).

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Vikas Gupta; Michael A Thompson; Andrew A Lane
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Social Media and Oncology: The Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Communication Between Physician and Patient.

Authors:  Mark A Lewis; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  #GeriMedJC: The Twitter Complement to the Traditional-Format Geriatric Medicine Journal Club.

Authors:  Amanda I Gardhouse; Laura Budd; Seu Y C Yang; Camilla L Wong
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Qualitative Twitter analysis of participants, tweet strategies, and tweet content at a major urologic conference.

Authors:  Hendrik Borgmann; Jan-Henning Woelm; Axel Merseburger; Tim Nestler; Johannes Salem; Maximilian P Brandt; Axel Haferkamp; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Use of Twitter Polls to Determine Public Opinion Regarding Content Presented at a Major National Specialty Society Meeting.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; C Matthew Hawkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Twitter use at a family medicine conference: analyzing #STFM13.

Authors:  Ranit Mishori; Brendan Levy; Benjamin Donvan
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 7.  Social Media and the Practicing Hematologist: Twitter 101 for the Busy Healthcare Provider.

Authors:  Michael A Thompson; Navneet S Majhail; William A Wood; Miguel-Angel Perales; Mélanie Chaboissier
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.952

8.  Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2013-2016.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Diane M Radford; Michael S Cowher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Introducing the Twitter Impact Factor: An Objective Measure of Urology's Academic Impact on Twitter.

Authors:  Diana Cardona-Grau; Igor Sorokin; Gabriel Leinwand; Charles Welliver
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2016-04-02

10.  Tweeting the meeting: A comparative analysis of an Australian emergency medicine conference over four years.

Authors:  Cristian Udovicich; Anthony Barberi; Kalpa Perera
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Twitter Use in the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Community.

Authors:  Sagar S Patel; Navneet S Majhail
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Social Media in Hematology in 2017: Dystopia, Utopia, or Somewhere In-between?

Authors:  Aaron T Gerds; Teresa Chan
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 3.  Analysis of First-Year Twitter Metrics of a Rare Disease Community for Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm (BPDCN) on Social Media: #BPDCN.

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Audun Utengen; Vikas Gupta; Michael A Thompson; Andrew A Lane
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.952

4.  A Collaborative Framework Based for Semantic Patients-Behavior Analysis and Highlight Topics Discovery of Alcoholic Beverages in Online Healthcare Forums.

Authors:  Hamed Jelodar; Yongli Wang; Mahdi Rabbani; Gang Xiao; Ruxin Zhao
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  Using Social Media at National Meetings in Hematology-Optimal Use, Tips, Strategies, and Limitations.

Authors:  Aaron C Logan
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  Analysis of Cyberincivility in Posts by Health Professions Students: Descriptive Twitter Data Mining Study.

Authors:  Jennie C De Gagne; Eunji Cho; Sandra S Yamane; Haesu Jin; Jeehae D Nam; Dukyoo Jung
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2021-05-13

7.  Advances in cancer research dissemination through the pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  A Desai; I M Subbiah; V Subbiah
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 51.769

Review 8.  Netiquette for social media engagement for oncology professionals.

Authors:  Sara Beltrán Ponce; Maura M Barry; Don S Dizon; Matthew S Katz; Martina Murphy; Eleonora Teplinsky; Stacey Tinianov; Deanna J Attai; Merry Jennifer Markham
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.674

9.  Science and Social Media.

Authors:  Alan Regenberg
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 6.940

10.  Social Media Engagement at Academic Conferences: Report of the Association of Pathology Chairs 2018 and 2019 Annual Meeting Social Media Committee.

Authors:  Yonah C Ziemba; Dana Razzano; Timothy C Allen; Adam L Booth; Scott R Anderson; Anne Champeaux; Michael D Feldman; Valerie Fitzhugh; Simone Gittens; Marilea Grider; Mary Gupta; Christina Hanos; Karen Kelly; Tarush Kothari; Jennifer Laudadio; Amy Y Lin; Kamran M Mirza; Kathleen T Montone; Victor G Prieto; Daniel G Remick; Nicole D Riddle; Michael Schubert; Kelley Suskie; Nadeem Zafar; Stanley J Robboy; Priscilla S Markwood
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2020-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.