Literature DB >> 31192458

Taking advantage of external mechanical work to reduce metabolic cost: the mechanics and energetics of split-belt treadmill walking.

Natalia Sánchez1, Surabhi N Simha2, J Maxwell Donelan2, James M Finley1,3,4.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: The neuromotor system generates flexible motor patterns that can adapt to changes in our bodies or environment and also take advantage of assistance provided by the environment. We ask how energy minimization influences adaptive learning during human locomotion to improve economy when walking on a split-belt treadmill. We use a model-based approach to predict how people should adjust their walking pattern to take advantage of the assistance provided by the treadmill, and we validate these predictions empirically. We show that adaptation to a split-belt treadmill can be explained as a process by which people reduce step length asymmetry to take advantage of the work performed by the treadmill to reduce metabolic cost. Our results also have implications for the evaluation of devices designed to reduce effort during walking, as locomotor adaptation may serve as a model approach to understand how people learn to take advantage of external assistance. ABSTRACT: In everyday tasks such as walking and running, we often exploit the work performed by external sources to reduce effort. Recent research has focused on designing assistive devices capable of performing mechanical work to reduce the work performed by muscles and improve walking function. The success of these devices relies on the user learning to take advantage of this external assistance. Although adaptation is central to this process, the study of adaptation is often done using approaches that seem to have little in common with the use of external assistance. We show in 16 young, healthy participants that a common approach for studying adaptation, split-belt treadmill walking, can be understood from a perspective in which people learn to take advantage of mechanical work performed by the treadmill. Initially, during split-belt walking, people step further forward on the slow belt than the fast belt which we measure as a negative step length asymmetry, but this asymmetry is reduced with practice. We demonstrate that reductions in asymmetry allow people to extract positive work from the treadmill, reduce the positive work performed by the legs, and reduce metabolic cost. We also show that walking with positive step length asymmetries, defined by longer steps on the fast belt, minimizes metabolic cost, and people choose this pattern after guided experience of a wide range of asymmetries. Our results suggest that split-belt adaptation can be interpreted as a process by which people learn to take advantage of mechanical work performed by an external device to improve economy.
© 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2019 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor learning; assistive devices; locomotion; mechanical work; metabolic cost; split-belt walking

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31192458      PMCID: PMC6675650          DOI: 10.1113/JP277725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  41 in total

1.  Mechanics and energetics of swinging the human leg.

Authors:  Jiro Doke; J Maxwell Donelan; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Learning to walk with a robotic ankle exoskeleton.

Authors:  Keith E Gordon; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization.

Authors:  Jun Izawa; Tushar Rane; Opher Donchin; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data.

Authors:  J A Zeni; J G Richards; J S Higginson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Task performance is prioritized over energy reduction.

Authors:  Ravi Balasubramanian; Robert D Howe; Yoky Matsuoka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking.

Authors:  J Maxwell Donelan; Rodger Kram; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Interlimb coordination during locomotion: what can be adapted and stored?

Authors:  Darcy S Reisman; Hannah J Block; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Mechanics and energetics of level walking with powered ankle exoskeletons.

Authors:  Gregory S Sawicki; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  A model of human muscle energy expenditure.

Authors:  Brian R Umberger; Karin G M Gerritsen; Philip E Martin
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.763

10.  A PHYSIOLOGIST'S PERSPECTIVE ON ROBOTIC EXOSKELETONS FOR HUMAN LOCOMOTION.

Authors:  Daniel P Ferris; Gregory S Sawicki; Monica A Daley
Journal:  Int J HR       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.616

View more
  17 in total

1.  Manual stabilization reveals a transient role for balance control during locomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Sungwoo Park; James M Finley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  Which lower limb joints compensate for destabilizing energy during walking in humans?

Authors:  Pawel R Golyski; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  Foot contact forces can be used to personalize a wearable robot during human walking.

Authors:  Michael Jacobson; Prakyath Kantharaju; Hyeongkeun Jeong; Jae-Kwan Ryu; Jung-Jae Park; Hyun-Joon Chung; Myunghee Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  General variability leads to specific adaptation toward optimal movement policies.

Authors:  Sabrina J Abram; Katherine L Poggensee; Natalia Sánchez; Surabhi N Simha; James M Finley; Steven H Collins; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 10.900

5.  Asymmetric walking on an incline affects aspects of positive mechanical work asymmetrically.

Authors:  Christopher P Hurt; Daniel J Kuhman; William R Reed; Andrew Baumann; Wei Jiang; Katherine Marsh
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  The human preference for symmetric walking often disappears when one leg is constrained.

Authors:  Michael G Browne; Cameron S Smock; Ryan T Roemmich
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Using asymmetry to your advantage: learning to acquire and accept external assistance during prolonged split-belt walking.

Authors:  Natalia Sánchez; Surabhi N Simha; J Maxwell Donelan; James M Finley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Reduced joint motion supersedes asymmetry in explaining increased metabolic demand during walking with mechanical restriction.

Authors:  Emily M McCain; Matthew E Berno; Theresa L Libera; Michael D Lewek; Gregory S Sawicki; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Augmenting propulsion demands during split-belt walking increases locomotor adaptation of asymmetric step lengths.

Authors:  Carly J Sombric; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Altered active control of step width in response to mediolateral leg perturbations while walking.

Authors:  Nicholas K Reimold; Holly A Knapp; Rachel E Henderson; Landi Wilson; Alyssa N Chesnutt; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.