Literature DB >> 21414926

Younger is not always better: development of locomotor adaptation from childhood to adulthood.

Erin V L Vasudevan1, Gelsy Torres-Oviedo, Susanne M Morton, Jaynie F Yang, Amy J Bastian.   

Abstract

New walking patterns can be learned over short timescales (i.e., adapted in minutes) using a split-belt treadmill that controls the speed of each leg independently. This leads to storage of a modified spatial and temporal motor pattern that is expressed as an aftereffect in regular walking conditions. Because split-belt walking is a novel task for adults and children alike, we used it to investigate how motor adaptation matures during human development. We also asked whether the immature pattern resembles that of people with cerebellar dysfunction, because we know that this adaptation depends on cerebellar integrity. Healthy children (3-18 years old) and adults, and individuals with cerebellar damage were adapted while walking on split belts (1:2 speed ratio). Adaptation and de-adaptation rates were quantified separately for temporal and spatial parameters. All healthy children and adults tested could learn the new timing at the same rate and showed significant aftereffects. However, children younger than 6 years old were unable to learn the new spatial coordination. Furthermore, children as old as age 11 years old showed slower rates of adaptation and de-adaptation of spatial parameters of walking. Young children showed patterns similar to cerebellar patients, with greater deficits in spatial versus temporal adaptation. Thus, although walking is a well-practiced, refined motor skill by late childhood (i.e., 11 years of age), the processes underlying learning new spatial relationships between the legs are still developing. The maturation of locomotor adaptation follows at least two time courses, which we propose is determined by the developmental state of the cerebellum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21414926      PMCID: PMC3084584          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5781-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  41 in total

1.  Development of the corticospinal system and hand motor function: central conduction times and motor performance tests.

Authors:  U M Fietzek; F Heinen; S Berweck; S Maute; A Hufschmidt; J Schulte-Mönting; C H Lücking; R Korinthenberg
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 2.  Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  A Diamond
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

3.  Learning to move amid uncertainty.

Authors:  R A Scheidt; J B Dingwell; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment.

Authors:  C D Takahashi; R A Scheidt; D J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Force adaptation transfers to untrained workspace regions in children: evidence for developing inverse dynamic motor models.

Authors:  Petra Jansen-Osmann; Stefanie Richter; Jürgen Konczak; Karl-Theodor Kalveram
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  What guides the selection of alternate foot placement during locomotion in humans.

Authors:  A E Patla; S D Prentice; S Rietdyk; F Allard; C Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Thinking about walking: effects of conscious correction versus distraction on locomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Development of force adaptation during childhood.

Authors:  Jürgen Konczak; Petra Jansen-Osmann; Karl-Theodor Kalveram
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Infants adapt their stepping to repeated trip-inducing stimuli.

Authors:  Marco Y C Pang; Tania Lam; Jaynie F Yang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neuromotor noise limits motor performance, but not motor adaptation, in children.

Authors:  Craig D Takahashi; Dan Nemet; Christie M Rose-Gottron; Jennifer K Larson; Dan M Cooper; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  58 in total

1.  How does the motor system correct for errors in time and space during locomotor adaptation?

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Amy J Bastian; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Split-belt walking: adaptation differences between young and older adults.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Bruijn; Annouchka Van Impe; Jacques Duysens; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Natural error patterns enable transfer of motor learning to novel contexts.

Authors:  Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Split-belt walking adaptation recalibrates sensorimotor estimates of leg speed but not position or force.

Authors:  Alejandro Vazquez; Matthew A Statton; Stefanie A Busgang; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Development of internal models and predictive abilities for visual tracking during childhood.

Authors:  Caroline Ego; Demet Yüksel; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Gait speed influences aftereffect size following locomotor adaptation, but only in certain environments.

Authors:  Rami J Hamzey; Eileen M Kirk; Erin V L Vasudevan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Coping with asymmetry: how infants and adults walk with one elongated leg.

Authors:  Whitney G Cole; Simone V Gill; Beatrix Vereijken; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2014-05-20

8.  Sensitivity of spatiotemporal gait parameters in measuring disease severity in Friedreich ataxia.

Authors:  Sarah C Milne; Darren R Hocking; Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis; Anna Murphy; Martin B Delatycki; Louise A Corben
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Practice Structure and Locomotor Learning After Stroke.

Authors:  Erin E Helm; Ryan T Pohlig; Devina S Kumar; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 10.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.