Literature DB >> 23136347

Motor learning and its sensory effects: time course of perceptual change and its presence with gradual introduction of load.

Andrew A G Mattar1, Mohammad Darainy, David J Ostry.   

Abstract

A complex interplay has been demonstrated between motor and sensory systems. We showed recently that motor learning leads to changes in the sensed position of the limb (Ostry DJ, Darainy M, Mattar AA, Wong J, Gribble PL. J Neurosci 30: 5384-5393, 2010). Here, we document further the links between motor learning and changes in somatosensory perception. To study motor learning, we used a force field paradigm in which subjects learn to compensate for forces applied to the hand by a robotic device. We used a task in which subjects judge lateral displacements of the hand to study somatosensory perception. In a first experiment, we divided the motor learning task into incremental phases and tracked sensory perception throughout. We found that changes in perception occurred at a slower rate than changes in motor performance. A second experiment tested whether awareness of the motor learning process is necessary for perceptual change. In this experiment, subjects were exposed to a force field that grew gradually in strength. We found that the shift in sensory perception occurred even when awareness of motor learning was reduced. These experiments argue for a link between motor learning and changes in somatosensory perception, and they are consistent with the idea that motor learning drives sensory change.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23136347      PMCID: PMC3567396          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00734.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  48 in total

1.  Inhibitory control of competing motor memories.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; H H Holcomb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Representational plasticity in cortical area 3b paralleling tactual-motor skill acquisition in adult monkeys.

Authors:  C Xerri; M M Merzenich; W Jenkins; S Santucci
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Apr-May       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Motor learning by field approximation.

Authors:  F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi; E Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; T Brashers-Krug
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; H H Holcomb
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; R Camarda; L Fogassi; M Gentilucci; G Luppino; M Matelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Consolidation in human motor memory.

Authors:  T Brashers-Krug; R Shadmehr; E Bizzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Experience-induced plasticity of cutaneous maps in the primary somatosensory cortex of adult monkeys and rats.

Authors:  C Xerri; J O Coq; M M Merzenich; W M Jenkins
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  1996

10.  Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation.

Authors:  W M Jenkins; M M Merzenich; M T Ochs; T Allard; E Guíc-Robles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  26 in total

1.  Split-belt walking adaptation recalibrates sensorimotor estimates of leg speed but not position or force.

Authors:  Alejandro Vazquez; Matthew A Statton; Stefanie A Busgang; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Perceptual learning in sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Mohammad Darainy; Shahabeddin Vahdat; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The influence of age on adaptation of disparity vergence and phoria.

Authors:  Tara L Alvarez; Eun H Kim; Chang Yaramothu; Bérangère Granger-Donetti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Generalization patterns for reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration differ after visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Generalization of reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration at different distances in the workspace.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mostafa; Rozbeh Kamran-Disfani; Golsa Bahari-Kashani; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Somatosensory cortical excitability changes precede those in motor cortex during human motor learning.

Authors:  Hiroki Ohashi; Paul L Gribble; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Movement and perception recalibrate differently across multiple days of locomotor learning.

Authors:  Kristan A Leech; Kevin A Day; Ryan T Roemmich; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Plasticity in the human speech motor system drives changes in speech perception.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Amélie Rochet-Capellan; Emily Neufeld; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Proprioceptive recalibration arises slowly compared to reach adaptation.

Authors:  Basel Zbib; Denise Y P Henriques; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Error signals driving locomotor adaptation: cutaneous feedback from the foot is used to adapt movement during perturbed walking.

Authors:  Julia T Choi; Peter Jensen; Jens Bo Nielsen; Laurent J Bouyer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.