Literature DB >> 26424169

Linkage between the PROMIS® pediatric and adult emotional distress measures.

Bryce B Reeve1,2, David Thissen3, Darren A DeWalt4, I-Chan Huang5,6, Yang Liu7, Brooke Magnus3, Hally Quinn3, Heather E Gross8, Pamela A Kisala9, Pengsheng Ni10, Stephen Haley10, M J Mulcahey11, Susie Charlifue12, Robin A Hanks13, Mary Slavin10, Alan Jette10, David S Tulsky9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Research studies that measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in both children and adults and longitudinal studies that follow children into adulthood need measures that can be compared across these age groups. This study links the PROMIS pediatric and adult emotional distress measures using data from participants with diverse health conditions and disabilities.
METHODS: Analyses were conducted and compared in two separate samples to confirm the stability of results. One sample (n = 874) included individuals aged 14-20 years with special health care needs and who require health services. The other sample (n = 641) included individuals aged 14-25 years who have a physical or cognitive disability. Participants completed both PROMIS pediatric and adult measures. Item response theory-based scores were linked using the linear approximation to calibrated projection.
RESULTS: The estimated latent-variable correlation between pediatric and adult PROMIS measures ranged from 0.87 to 0.94. Regression coefficients β 0 (intercept) and β 1 (slope), and mean squared error are provided to transform scores from the pediatric to the adult measures, and vice versa.
CONCLUSIONS: This study used a relatively new linking method, calibrated projection, to link PROMIS pediatric and adult measure scores, thus expanding the use of PROMIS measures to research that includes both populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emotional distress; Item response theory; Linkage; PROMIS; Patient-reported outcomes; Pediatrics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26424169      PMCID: PMC4814370          DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1143-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  23 in total

1.  Equating health status measures with item response theory: illustrations with functional status items.

Authors:  C A McHorney; A S Cohen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population*.

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Albert W Wu; Constantine Frangakis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Introducing equating methodologies to compare test scores from two different self-regulation scales.

Authors:  Louise C Mâsse; Diane Allen; Mark Wilson; Geoffrey Williams
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2006-08-22

4.  A new definition of children with special health care needs.

Authors:  M McPherson; P Arango; H Fox; C Lauver; M McManus; P W Newacheck; J M Perrin; J P Shonkoff; B Strickland
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Equating the MOS SF36 and the LSU HSI Physical Functioning Scales.

Authors:  W P Fisher; R L Eubanks; R L Marier
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  1997

6.  Identifying children with special health care needs: development and evaluation of a short screening instrument.

Authors:  Christina D Bethell; Debra Read; Ruth E K Stein; Stephen J Blumberg; Nora Wells; Paul W Newacheck
Journal:  Ambul Pediatr       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

7.  Identifying and classifying children with chronic conditions using administrative data with the clinical risk group classification system.

Authors:  John M Neff; Virginia L Sharp; John Muldoon; Jeff Graham; Jean Popalisky; James C Gay
Journal:  Ambul Pediatr       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

8.  Equating EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G scores and its use in oncological research.

Authors:  B Holzner; R K Bode; E A Hahn; D Cella; M Kopp; B Sperner-Unterweger; G Kemmler
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Tracking functional status across the spinal cord injury lifespan: linking pediatric and adult patient-reported outcome scores.

Authors:  Feng Tian; Pengsheng Ni; M J Mulcahey; Ronald K Hambleton; David Tulsky; Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review.

Authors:  Darren A DeWalt; Nan Rothrock; Susan Yount; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  18 in total

1.  Simultaneous Linking of Cross-Informant and Longitudinal Data Involving Positive Family Relationships.

Authors:  Kathleen Suzanne Johnson Preston; Allen W Gottfried; Jonathan J Park; Patrick Don Manapat; Adele Eskeles Gottfried; Pamella H Oliver
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Health-related quality of life in glomerular disease.

Authors:  Pietro A Canetta; Jonathan P Troost; Shannon Mahoney; Amy J Kogon; Noelle Carlozzi; Sharon M Bartosh; Yi Cai; T Keefe Davis; Hilda Fernandez; Alessia Fornoni; Rasheed A Gbadegesin; Emily Herreshoff; John D Mahan; Patrick H Nachman; David T Selewski; Christine B Sethna; Tarak Srivastava; Katherine R Tuttle; Chia-Shi Wang; Ronald J Falk; Ali G Gharavi; Brenda W Gillespie; Larry A Greenbaum; Lawrence B Holzman; Matthias Kretzler; Bruce M Robinson; William E Smoyer; Lisa M Guay-Woodford; Bryce Reeve; Debbie S Gipson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  The Effect of Pain Catastrophizing on Outcomes: A Developmental Perspective Across Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Amanda B Feinstein; John A Sturgeon; Beth D Darnall; Ashley L Dunn; Tom Rico; Ming C Kao; Rashmi P Bhandari
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Optimizing the measurement of health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  John M Salsman; Suzanne C Danhauer; Justin B Moore; Mollie R Canzona; David E Victorson; Bradley J Zebrack; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Psychometric evaluation of the pediatric and parent-proxy Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and the Neurology and Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life measurement item banks in pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Hilary Bertisch; Frederick P Rivara; Pamela A Kisala; Jin Wang; Keith Owen Yeates; Dennis Durbin; Mark R Zonfrillo; Michael J Bell; Nancy Temkin; David S Tulsky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Known-groups validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) in adolescents and young adults with special healthcare needs.

Authors:  Carrie R Howell; Heather E Gross; Bryce B Reeve; Darren A DeWalt; I-Chan Huang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Expanding a common metric for depression reporting: linking two scales to PROMIS® depression.

Authors:  Aaron J Kaat; Michael E Newcomb; Daniel T Ryan; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  PROMIS® Pediatric Depressive Symptoms as a Harmonized Score Metric.

Authors:  Aaron J Kaat; Michael A Kallen; Cindy J Nowinski; Stacy A Sterling; Sherrilyn R Westbrook; John T Peters
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2020-04-01

9.  Linking Scores with Patient-Reported Health Outcome Instruments: A Validation Study and Comparison of Three Linking Methods.

Authors:  Benjamin D Schalet; Sangdon Lim; David Cella; Seung W Choi
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Differential item functioning in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Short Forms in a sample of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Wendy J Coster; Pengsheng Ni; Mary D Slavin; Pamela A Kisala; Ratna Nandakumar; Mary Jane Mulcahey; David S Tulsky; Alan M Jette
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.