Literature DB >> 9661727

Equating the MOS SF36 and the LSU HSI Physical Functioning Scales.

W P Fisher1, R L Eubanks, R L Marier.   

Abstract

This study equates the physical functioning subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF36) and the Louisiana State University Health Status Instruments (LSU HSI). Data from the SF36's 10-item physical functioning scale, the PF10, and the LSU HSI's 29-item Physical Functioning Scale (PFS), were fit to separate and mixed Rasch rating scale models. Data were provided by a convenience sample of 285 patients waiting for appointments in a public hospital general medicine clinic. Difficulty estimates for a subset of similar items from the two instruments were highly correlated (.95), indicating that the items from the two scales are working together to measure the same variable. The measures from the two equated instruments correlate .80 (.86 when disattenuated for error). Of the two instruments, the PFS's error is lower, model fit is better, and reliability coefficients are higher. Both instruments measure physical functioning, and can do so in a common unit of measurement. Conversion tables are provided for transforming raw scores from either instrument into the common metric.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9661727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Outcome Meas        ISSN: 1090-655X


  16 in total

1.  Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale.

Authors:  J B Bjorner; M Aa Petersen; M Groenvold; N Aaronson; M Ahlner-Elmqvist; J I Arraras; A Brédart; P Fayers; M Jordhoy; M Sprangers; M Watson; T Young
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Shouldn't we be making better use of the best available health measurement technologies?

Authors:  William P Fisher
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-09-11

3.  Establishing a Common Metric for Physical Function: Linking the HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF Subscale to PROMIS(®) Physical Function.

Authors:  Benjamin D Schalet; Dennis A Revicki; Karon F Cook; Eswar Krishnan; Jim F Fries; David Cella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Improving CKD-Specific Patient-Reported Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  John E Ware; Michelle M Richardson; Klemens B Meyer; Barbara Gandek
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Linkage between the PROMIS® pediatric and adult emotional distress measures.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; David Thissen; Darren A DeWalt; I-Chan Huang; Yang Liu; Brooke Magnus; Hally Quinn; Heather E Gross; Pamela A Kisala; Pengsheng Ni; Stephen Haley; M J Mulcahey; Susie Charlifue; Robin A Hanks; Mary Slavin; Alan Jette; David S Tulsky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  More relevant, precise, and efficient items for assessment of physical function and disability: moving beyond the classic instruments.

Authors:  J F Fries; B Bruce; J Bjorner; M Rose
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Using the PedsQL™ 3.0 asthma module to obtain scores comparable with those of the PROMIS pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS).

Authors:  David Thissen; James W Varni; Brian D Stucky; Yang Liu; Debra E Irwin; Darren A Dewalt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The responsiveness of headache impact scales scored using 'classical' and 'modern' psychometric methods: a re-analysis of three clinical trials.

Authors:  M Kosinski; J B Bjorner; J E Ware; A Batenhorst; R K Cady
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Establishing a common metric for depressive symptoms: linking the BDI-II, CES-D, and PHQ-9 to PROMIS depression.

Authors:  Seung W Choi; Benjamin Schalet; Karon F Cook; David Cella
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2014-02-17

10.  The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency.

Authors:  Matthias Rose; Jakob B Bjorner; Barbara Gandek; Bonnie Bruce; James F Fries; John E Ware
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.