| Literature DB >> 26418876 |
Xing Yang1, Il Minn1, Steven P Rowe1, Sangeeta Ray Banerjee1, Michael A Gorin2, Mary Brummet1, Hye Soo Lee1, Soo Min Koo1, Polina Sysa-Shah1, Ronnie C Mease1, Sridhar Nimmagadda1, Mohamad E Allaf2, Martin G Pomper1.
Abstract
We developed a new scaffold for radionuclide-based imaging and therapy of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) targeting carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX). Compound XYIMSR-01, a DOTA-conjugated, bivalent, low-molecular-weight ligand, has two moieties that target two separate sites on CAIX, imparting high affinity. We synthesized [111In]XYIMSR-01 in 73.8-75.8% (n = 3) yield with specific radioactivities ranging from 118 - 1,021 GBq/μmol (3,200-27,600 Ci/mmol). Single photon emission computed tomography of [111In]XYIMSR-01 in immunocompromised mice bearing CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 tumors revealed radiotracer uptake in tumor as early as 1 h post-injection. Biodistribution studies demonstrated 26% injected dose per gram of radioactivity within tumor at 1 h. Tumor-to-blood, muscle and kidney ratios were 178.1 ± 145.4, 68.4 ± 29.0 and 1.7 ± 1.2, respectively, at 24 h post-injection. Retention of radioactivity was exclusively observed in tumors by 48 h, the latest time point evaluated. The dual targeting strategy to engage CAIX enabled specific detection of ccRCC in this xenograft model, with pharmacokinetics surpassing those of previously described radionuclide-based probes against CAIX.Entities:
Keywords: CAIX; indium-111; molecular imaging; renal cell carcinoma; single photon emission computed tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26418876 PMCID: PMC4741798 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553

Figure 1Dual-motif CAIX-targeting small molecule labeled with FITC 8 binds to CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells
A. Structure of 8. B. FACS analysis of 8 for binding to CAIX-negative BxPC3 cells (left) and CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells (right). Compound 8 showed significant binding to CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells at concentrations as low as 10 nM.
Figure 2FITC-labeled 8 binds to the surface of CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells
Fluorescence microscopic analyses of BxPC3 A and B, and SK-RC-52 C and D. Cells are non-labeled (A and C) and labeled with 8 (B and D). Compound 8 bound to the cell surface of SK-RC-52. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 3Compounds 1, XYIMSR-01 and [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 demonstrate high binding affinity to CAIX
IC50 values of positive control CAIX targeting agent 1 A. XYIMSR-01 B. and [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 C. were determined relative to the inhibition of fluorescence polarization of FITC labeled 8 with a known Kd of 0.2 nM for CAIX [27].
Figure 4Compound 8 had higher binding affinity to CAIX compared to CAII and CAXII
Saturation binding curves for CAII, CAIX, and CAXII were generated. 5 nM of compound 8 was titrated by increasing concentrations of CAII, CAIX, and CAXII and the resultant fluorescence polarization (mP) was measured, with EC50 values calculated.
Figure 5[111In]XYIMSR-01 enabled specific imaging of CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 tumors
SPECT/CT imaging of two mice harboring CAIX-expressing SKRC-52 tumors within the lower left flank. Images were obtained at 1, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h after injection of 14.8 MBq (400 μCi) of [111In]XYIMSR-01 via the tail vein. Arrows indicate tumors.
Biodistribution of [111In]XYIMSR-01 at 1 h, 4 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h post-injection
| Organs | 1 h | 4 h | 8 h | 24 h | 24 h + Block | 48 h | 48 h + Block |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood | 1.34 ± 0.17 | 0.65 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
| Heart | 5.98 ± 0.53 | 2.91 ± 0.45 | 2.61 ± 0.35 | 1.16 ± 0.20 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.84 ± 0.16 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| Lung | 45.85 ± 19.89 | 17.85 ± 3.55 | 17.39 ± 8.99 | 11.01 ± 3.71 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 9.22 ± 1.25 | 0.09 ± 0.02 |
| Pancreas | 3.81 ± 0.72 | 1.54 ± 0.40 | 1.61 ± 0.28 | 0.69 ± 0.18 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.59 ± 0.18 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| Spleen | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.51 ± 0.08 | 0.64 ± 0.07 | 0.69 ± 0.39 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.13 | 0.11 ± 0.03 |
| Fat | 1.03 ± 0.24 | 0.42 ± 0.22 | 0.45 ± 0.08 | 0.28 ± 0.19 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.08 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| Brain | 1.23 ± 1.10 | 0.45 ± 0.06 | 0.59 ± 0.09 | 0.71 ± 0.85 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| Muscle (mm) | 2.34 ± 2.19 | 1.01 ± 0.28 | 1.09 ± 0.15 | 0.35 ± 0.12 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.39 ± 0.28 | 0.02 ± 0.00 |
| Sm. intestine | 9.37 ± 1.26 | 4.27 ± 0.69 | 4.31 ± 0.67 | 2.11 ± 0.33 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 1.22 ± 0.44 | 0.08 ± 0.02 |
| Liver | 8.36 ± 0.73 | 4.00 ± 0.58 | 3.65 ± 0.65 | 3.02 ± 3.46 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 1.65 ± 0.26 | 0.13 ± 0.04 |
| Stomach | 16.71 ± 2.46 | 7.91 ± 1.28 | 8.74 ± 1.26 | 3.31 ± 1.25 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 1.82 ± 0.43 | 0.14 ± 0.03 |
| Kidney (kid) | 71.26 ± 8.74 | 41.52 ± 6.07 | 28.79 ± 21.35 | 15.29 ± 1.69 | 0.68 ± 0.14 | 8.78 ± 1.89 | 0.45 ± 0.09 |
| Bladder | 4.90 ± 4.96 | 2.68 ± 1.89 | 2.28 ± 0.51 | 0.74 ± 0.17 | 0.20 ± 0.07 | 0.38 ± 0.18 | 0.14 ± 0.03 |
| Tumor | 26.01 ± 5.74 | 20.83 ± 6.25 | 34.00 ± 15.16 | 25.62 ± 17.67 | 1.41 ± 0.20 | 13.92 ± 6.67 | 1.22 ± 0.54 |
| Tumor/blood | 19.7 ± 4.8 | 31.9 ± 9.4 | 77.0 ± 32.5 | 178.1 ± 145.4 | 45.2 ± 9.7 | 212.0 ± 41.4 | 45.4 ± 13.8 |
| Tumor/mm | 12.7 ± 5.8 | 21.4 ± 7.2 | 34.2 ± 16.0 | 68.4 ± 29.0 | 91.4 ± 11.1 | 52.0 ± 21.0 | 75.1 ± 17.7 |
| Tumor/kid | 0.36 ± 0.06 | 0.50 ± 0.15 | 3.1 ± 3.1 | 1.7 ± 1.2 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 2.7 ± 0.8 |
Results are expressed as the percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) of tissue, n = 5.