Literature DB >> 21557795

Metastatic potential of a renal mass according to original tumour size at presentation.

Eric C Umbreit1, Mark S Shimko, M Adam Childs, Christine M Lohse, John C Cheville, Bradley C Leibovich, Michael L Blute, R Houston Thompson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the metastatic potential of renal masses based on original tumour size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 2651 patients who had undergone surgical resection for a unilateral, sporadic renal tumour between 1990 and 2006. Associations of tumour size with synchronous metastasis at presentation [M1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC)] and development of metastases, death from RCC, and death from any cause after surgery were evaluated using logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: Of the 2651 patients studied, 182 (6.9%) presented with M1 RCC. Tumour size was significantly greater in patients with M1 RCC than in patients with M0 RCC (a median size of 10 vs 4.5 cm; P < 0.001). Only 1 of the 629 patients (0.2%) with a tumour <3 cm had M1 RCC and that tumour was 2.5 cm. The risk of M1 RCC increased from 1.1% for patients with tumours 3-3.9 cm to 16.5% for patients with tumours ≥7 cm. Of the 2124 patients with M0 RCC, 430 developed distant metastases at a median (range) of 1.4 (0.1-16.2) years after surgery. Only 9 of the 498 patients (1.8%) with a tumour <3 cm developed distant metastases after surgery. Each 1-cm increase in tumour size increased the risk of death from RCC by 20%[hazard ratio (HR) 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-1.22; P < 0.001] and death from any cause by 10% (HR 1.10; 95% CI 1.09-1.12; P < 0.001). For the 1346 patients who were still alive at last follow-up, the median (range) duration of follow-up was 6.9 (0.1-19.7) years.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumour size is significantly associated with metastases in patients with renal masses. Patients with tumours <3 cm have a low risk of synchronous metastatic disease.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21557795     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10184.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  20 in total

1.  Machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of CT images of small renal masses: Differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhichao Feng; Pengfei Rong; Peng Cao; Qingyu Zhou; Wenwei Zhu; Zhimin Yan; Qianyun Liu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A New Robust Method for Nonlinear Regression.

Authors:  M A Tabatabai; J J Kengwoung-Keumo; W M Eby; S Bae; U Manne; M Fouad; K P Singh
Journal:  J Biom Biostat       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Percutaneous biopsy for risk stratification of renal masses.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; Anna Drewry; Edwin Jason Abel
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-10

4.  The impact of three-dimensional tumor volume on cancer-specific survival for patients with pT1 clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wan Song; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Urine aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 differentiate renal carcinomas from other imaged renal masses and bladder and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Morrissey; Jonathan Mobley; R Sherburne Figenshau; Joel Vetter; Sam Bhayani; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  De Novo Malignancies after Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  David Al-Adra; Talal Al-Qaoud; Kevin Fowler; Germaine Wong
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Growth kinetics of small renal masses: A prospective analysis from the Renal Cell Carcinoma Consortium of Canada.

Authors:  Michael Organ; Michael Jewett; Joan Basiuk; Christopher Morash; Stephen Pautler; D Robert Siemens; Simon Tanguay; Martin Gleave; Darrell Drachenberg; Raymond Chow; Joseph Chin; Andrew Evans; Neil Fleshner; Brenda Gallie; Masoom Haider; John Kachura; Antonio Finelli; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Partial nephrectomy in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kara N Babaian; Megan M Merrill; Surena Matin; Pheroze Tamboli; Nizar M Tannir; Eric Jonasch; Christopher G Wood; Jose A Karam
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The effect of delaying nephrectomy on oncologic outcomes in patients with renal tumors greater than 4cm.

Authors:  Roy Mano; Emily A Vertosick; Abraham Ari Hakimi; Itay A Sternberg; Daniel D Sjoberg; Melanie Bernstein; Guido Dalbagni; Jonathan A Coleman; Paul Russo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 10.  Current Management of Small Renal Masses, Including Patient Selection, Renal Tumor Biopsy, Active Surveillance, and Thermal Ablation.

Authors:  Alejandro Sanchez; Adam S Feldman; A Ari Hakimi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.