A Rouchaud1, W Brinjikji2, Y-H Ding3, D Dai3, Y Q Zhu3, H J Cloft2, D F Kallmes4, R Kadirvel3. 1. From the Neuroradiology Research Laboratory (A.R., Y.-H.D., D.D., Y.Q.Z., D.F.K., R.K.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota the Department of Radiology (A.R., W.B., H.J.C., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Rouchaud.Aymeric@mayo.edu aymeric.rouchaud@gmail.com. 2. the Department of Radiology (A.R., W.B., H.J.C., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. From the Neuroradiology Research Laboratory (A.R., Y.-H.D., D.D., Y.Q.Z., D.F.K., R.K.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. From the Neuroradiology Research Laboratory (A.R., Y.-H.D., D.D., Y.Q.Z., D.F.K., R.K.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota the Department of Radiology (A.R., W.B., H.J.C., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The WEB Occlusion Score has been proposed to assess angiographic outcomes for intracranial aneurysms treated with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device. Using a large series of experimental aneurysms treated with the WEB, we had the following objectives: 1) to compare angiographic outcomes as measured by the WEB Occlusion Scale with histologic results, and 2) to assess interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the WEB Occlusion Scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intracranial aneurysms were created in 80 rabbits and treated with WEB devices. Animals were sacrificed at last follow-up for histologic evaluation. DSA was performed just after the deployment of the device and at follow-up. Four investigators independently and retrospectively graded the DSA twice according to the WEB Occlusion Scale. One histopathologist blinded to the angiographic results graded the occlusion according to a 4-point scale patterned on the WEB Occlusion Scale. Intra- and interobserver agreement were evaluated for DSA. Follow-up angiographic grading and histologic reference were compared to determine the WEB Occlusion Scale accuracy for complete (with or without recess filling) versus incomplete occlusion and adequate (complete occlusion or neck remnant) versus inadequate occlusion. RESULTS: Inter- and intraobserver weighted κ for the angiographic WEB Occlusion Scale were, respectively, 0.76 and 0.76, indicating substantial agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of the WEB Occlusion Scale for complete occlusion at follow-up compared with the histologic reference standard were, respectively, 75% and 83.3%, with an overall accuracy of 80%. Similarly, for adequate occlusion at follow-up, sensitivity was 97.7%, specificity was 64.9%, and overall accuracy was 82.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The WEB Occlusion Scale appears to be consistent, reliable, and accurate compared with a histologic reference standard.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The WEB Occlusion Score has been proposed to assess angiographic outcomes for intracranial aneurysms treated with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device. Using a large series of experimental aneurysms treated with the WEB, we had the following objectives: 1) to compare angiographic outcomes as measured by the WEB Occlusion Scale with histologic results, and 2) to assess interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the WEB Occlusion Scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Intracranial aneurysms were created in 80 rabbits and treated with WEB devices. Animals were sacrificed at last follow-up for histologic evaluation. DSA was performed just after the deployment of the device and at follow-up. Four investigators independently and retrospectively graded the DSA twice according to the WEB Occlusion Scale. One histopathologist blinded to the angiographic results graded the occlusion according to a 4-point scale patterned on the WEB Occlusion Scale. Intra- and interobserver agreement were evaluated for DSA. Follow-up angiographic grading and histologic reference were compared to determine the WEB Occlusion Scale accuracy for complete (with or without recess filling) versus incomplete occlusion and adequate (complete occlusion or neck remnant) versus inadequate occlusion. RESULTS: Inter- and intraobserver weighted κ for the angiographic WEB Occlusion Scale were, respectively, 0.76 and 0.76, indicating substantial agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of the WEB Occlusion Scale for complete occlusion at follow-up compared with the histologic reference standard were, respectively, 75% and 83.3%, with an overall accuracy of 80%. Similarly, for adequate occlusion at follow-up, sensitivity was 97.7%, specificity was 64.9%, and overall accuracy was 82.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The WEB Occlusion Scale appears to be consistent, reliable, and accurate compared with a histologic reference standard.
Authors: C Papagiannaki; L Spelle; A-C Januel; A Benaissa; J-Y Gauvrit; V Costalat; H Desal; F Turjman; S Velasco; X Barreau; P Courtheoux; C Cognard; D Herbreteau; J Moret; L Pierot Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Joachim Klisch; Vojtech Sychra; Christoph Strasilla; Thomas Liebig; David Fiorella Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: D N Gherasim; B Gory; R Sivan-Hoffmann; L Pierot; H Raoult; J-Y Gauvrit; H Desal; X Barreau; D Herbreteau; R Riva; F Ambesi Impiombato; X Armoiry; F Turjman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: L Pierot; T Liebig; V Sychra; K Kadziolka; F Dorn; C Strasilla; C Kabbasch; J Klisch Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: I S Muskens; S J H Diederen; J T Senders; A H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; W R van Furth; A M May; T R Smith; A L Bredenoord; M L D Broekman Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2017-08-06 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Nitin Goyal; Daniel Hoit; Julie DiNitto; Lucas Elijovich; David Fiorella; Laurent Pierot; Saleh Lamin; Laurent Spelle; Isil Saatci; Saru Cekirge; Adam S Arthur Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Adam S Arthur; Andy Molyneux; Alexander L Coon; Isil Saatci; Istvan Szikora; Feyyaz Baltacioglu; Ali Sultan; Daniel Hoit; Josser E Delgado Almandoz; Lucas Elijovich; Saru Cekirge; James V Byrne; David Fiorella Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 5.836