INTRODUCTION: Endovascular treatment of ruptured wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms presents a challenge. While still under evaluation, the Woven Endobridge (WEB) aneurysm embolization system has so far shown promising results in the treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and short-term follow-up of endovascular treatment of ruptured wide-neck aneurysm with the WEB device. METHODS: Six patients referred to our institution for acute symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and treated with the WEB device were enrolled in this study. Clinical presentations, technical details, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and outcomes were recorded. Immediate and 3-month angiographic results were also evaluated. RESULTS: Three middle cerebral artery (MCA) and three anterior communicating artery aneurysms were treated between 1 and 14 days after rupturing. Average dome width was 5.8 mm (range 5-7), average neck size was 4.5 mm (range 4-5), and average dome-to-neck ratio was 1.3 (range 1-1.7). The WEB system was the exclusive treatment and was successfully deployed in all cases. Per procedural thromboembolic events occurred in two cases and were treated with intra-arterial administration of antiplatelet agents without any clinical consequences. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge was 0 for all patients. The 3-month angiographic follow-up showed adequate occlusion in four of our six patients (67 %). CONCLUSION: From this preliminary study, the high feasibility rate and lack of need for systematic antiplatelet agents favor the WEB device providing a solution for endovascular treatment of ruptured wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms during the acute phase. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the complication rate and long-term efficiency.
INTRODUCTION: Endovascular treatment of ruptured wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms presents a challenge. While still under evaluation, the Woven Endobridge (WEB) aneurysm embolization system has so far shown promising results in the treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and short-term follow-up of endovascular treatment of ruptured wide-neck aneurysm with the WEB device. METHODS: Six patients referred to our institution for acute symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and treated with the WEB device were enrolled in this study. Clinical presentations, technical details, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and outcomes were recorded. Immediate and 3-month angiographic results were also evaluated. RESULTS: Three middle cerebral artery (MCA) and three anterior communicating artery aneurysms were treated between 1 and 14 days after rupturing. Average dome width was 5.8 mm (range 5-7), average neck size was 4.5 mm (range 4-5), and average dome-to-neck ratio was 1.3 (range 1-1.7). The WEB system was the exclusive treatment and was successfully deployed in all cases. Per procedural thromboembolic events occurred in two cases and were treated with intra-arterial administration of antiplatelet agents without any clinical consequences. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge was 0 for all patients. The 3-month angiographic follow-up showed adequate occlusion in four of our six patients (67 %). CONCLUSION: From this preliminary study, the high feasibility rate and lack of need for systematic antiplatelet agents favor the WEB device providing a solution for endovascular treatment of ruptured wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms during the acute phase. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the complication rate and long-term efficiency.
Authors: M de Barros Faria; R Nella Castro; J Lundquist; E Scrivano; R Ceratto; A Ferrario; P Lylyk Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J Caroff; C Mihalea; H Neki; D Ruijters; L Ikka; N Benachour; J Moret; L Spelle Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ana Rodríguez-Hernández; Michael E Sughrue; Sina Akhavan; Julian Habdank-Kolaczkowski; Michael T Lawton Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Sep 3-9 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Pablo Harker; Robert W Regenhardt; Naif M Alotaibi; Justin Vranic; Faith C Robertson; Adam A Dmytriw; Jerry C Ku; Matthew Koch; Christopher J Stapleton; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Nelson Serna; Boris Pabon; Juan A Mejia; Aman B Patel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: J Caroff; C Mihalea; J Klisch; C Strasilla; A Berlis; T Patankar; W Weber; D Behme; E A Jacobsen; T Liebig; S Prothmann; C Cognard; T Finkenzeller; J Moret; L Spelle Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T Liebig; C Kabbasch; C Strasilla; A Berlis; W Weber; L Pierot; T Patankar; X Barreau; J Dervin; A Kuršumović; S Rath; B Lubicz; J Klisch Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: D Herbreteau; R Bibi; A P Narata; K Janot; C Papagiannaki; S Soize; L Pierot Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J Caroff; H Neki; C Mihalea; F D'Argento; H Abdel Khalek; L Ikka; J Moret; L Spelle Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A Rouchaud; W Brinjikji; Y-H Ding; D Dai; Y Q Zhu; H J Cloft; D F Kallmes; R Kadirvel Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 3.825