Eva Meirovitch1, Zhichun Liang2, Jack H Freed2. 1. The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University , Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel. 2. Baker Laboratory of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York 14853-1301, United States.
Abstract
Deuterium line shape analysis from mobile C-D and C-CD3 groups has emerged as a particularly useful tool for studying dynamics in the solid state. The theoretical models devised so far consist typically of sets of independent dynamic modes. Each such mode is simple and usually case-specific. In this scenario, model improvement entails adding yet another mode (thereby changing the overall model), comparison of different cases is difficult, and ambiguity is unavoidable. We recently developed the microscopic order macroscopic disorder (MOMD) approach as a single-mode alternative. In MOMD, the local spatial restrictions are expressed by an anisotropic potential, the local motion by a diffusion tensor, and the local molecular geometry by relative (magnetic and model-related) tensor orientations, all of adjustable symmetry. This approach provides a consistent method of analysis, thus resolving the issues above. In this study, we apply MOMD to PS-adsorbed LKα14 peptide and dimethylammonium tetraphenylborate (C-CD3 and N-CD3 dynamics, respectively), as well as HhaI methyltransferase target DNA and phase III of benzene-6-hexanoate (C-D dynamics). The success with fitting these four disparate cases, as well as the two cases in the previous report, demonstrates the generality of this MOMD-based approach. In this study, C-D and C-CD3 are both found to execute axial diffusion (rates R⊥ and R∥) in the presence of a rhombic potential given by the L = 2 spherical harmonics (coefficients c02 and c22). R⊥ (R∥) is in the 102-103 (104-105) s-1 range, and c02 and c22 are on the order of 2-3 kBT. Specific parameter values are determined for each mobile site. The diffusion and quadrupolar tensors are tilted at either 120° (consistent with trans-gauche isomerization) or nearly 110.5° (consistent with methyl exchange). Future prospects include extension of the MOMD formalism to include MAS, and application to 15N and 13C nuclei.
Deuterium line shape analysis from mobile C-D and C-CD3 groups has emerged as a particularly useful tool for studying dynamics in the solid state. The theoretical models devised so farconsist typically of sets of independent dynamic modes. Each such mode is simple and usually case-specific. In this scenario, model improvement entails adding yet another mode (thereby changing the overall model), comparison of different cases is difficult, and ambiguity is unavoidable. We recently developed the microscopic order macroscopic disorder (MOMD) approach as a single-mode alternative. In MOMD, the local spatial restrictions are expressed by an anisotropic potential, the local motion by a diffusion tensor, and the local molecular geometry by relative (magnetic and model-related) tensor orientations, all of adjustable symmetry. This approach provides a consistent method of analysis, thus resolving the issues above. In this study, we apply MOMD to PS-adsorbed LKα14 peptide and dimethylammonium tetraphenylborate (C-CD3 and N-CD3 dynamics, respectively), as well as HhaI methyltransferase target DNA and phase III of benzene-6-hexanoate (C-D dynamics). The success with fitting these four disparate cases, as well as the two cases in the previous report, demonstrates the generality of this MOMD-based approach. In this study, C-D and C-CD3 are both found to execute axial diffusion (rates R⊥ and R∥) in the presence of a rhombic potential given by the L = 2 spherical harmonics (coefficients c02 and c22). R⊥ (R∥) is in the 102-103 (104-105) s-1 range, and c02 and c22 are on the order of 2-3 kBT. Specific parameter values are determined for each mobile site. The diffusion and quadrupolar tensors are tilted at either 120° (consistent with trans-gauche isomerization) or nearly 110.5° (consistent with methyl exchange). Future prospects include extension of the MOMD formalism to include MAS, and application to 15N and 13C nuclei.
2H NMR line
shape analysis is a powerful method for
studying structural dynamics in the solid state.[1,2] The
[isopropyl-2H7]-leucine probe has been used
in early work to investigate the dynamics of collagen fibrils.[3] In recent years, this probe has been used to
study physisorption of the Ac-LKKLLKLLKKLLKL-OH (LKα14) peptide
onto polystyrene (PS) and PS-COOH surfaces and carboxyl-functionalized
gold nanoparticles.[4−6] The d3-alanine and d3-leucine probes have been used to investigate
the dynamics of phospholamban embedded in phospholipid bilayers,[7,8] as well as partitioning and orientation of the lung surfactant peptide
KL4 in phospholipid bilayers.[9] The probes d3-leucine and d8-valine have been used recently to study side-chain dynamics in the
core of the Chicken Villin Headpiece Subdomain (HP36).[10,11] Extensive work associated with lipids, peptides, and proteins has
been carried out by the groups of Seelig (e.g., ref (12)), Davis (e.g., ref (13)), Griffin (e.g., ref (14)), Oldfield (e.g., ref (15)), Brown (e.g., ref (16)), etc. Deuterated tyrosine
side chains have served as a probe for studying peptide dynamics (e.g.,
ref (17)). 2H-Labeled methylene groups have been used to study polymer dynamics
(e.g., ref (18)). Deuterium
NMR has been used extensively to study liquid crystals.[19−21] Work focusing on NMR line shape and relaxation analysis in solids,
where key aspects have been treated, is described in refs (22−25). We also contributed in the past to this field of research.[17,26−28]Traditionally, dynamics in the solid-state
have been envisioned
as jump-type motions associated with barrier-crossing and hops among
energy wells (e.g., ref (29)). Only when the activation energy turned out to be very
small were simple diffusive models developed and utilized (e.g., ref (30)). However, a single (typically
jump-type) simple motion often does not reproduce satisfactorily dynamic2H line shapes in the solid state. Rather, several independent
simple motions have to be combined (e.g., refs (4−6), (10), and (11)). These
multi-simple-mode models are typically case-specific; hence, comparison
among different systems is difficult. In this scenario, the agreement
between calculated and experimental spectra can only be improved by
adding yet another simple mode; this alters the overall model. Finally,
the multi-simple-mode concept is inherently ambiguous, as many different
combinations of simple motions are possible.No model can be
proven to be unique. However, a general and comprehensive
approach to the treatment of restricted motions has been developed
within the scope of the stochastic Liouville equation (SLE) by Freed
and co-workers. The SLE applies to restricted overall[31−35] as well as internal[36−38] motions. The major underlying factors−type
of motion, spatial restrictions, and geometry−are treated generally
for the entire motional range, within theirrigorous three-dimensional
tensorial requirements.Particularly relevant in the present
context is the extension of
the SLEcalled microscopic-order-macroscopic-disorder (MOMD) approach,
where the director of the restricting environment is distributed randomly
over the sample.[39] MOMD/ESR was applied
to nitroxide probes in liposomes,[40] and
later to internal motions in nitroxide-labeled proteins and DNA fragments
in “frozen” solutions (i.e., scenarios where the global
motion of the (typically large) molecule may be considered “frozen”
on the ESR time scale).[41,42] The ESRnitroxide label
in “frozen” solutions is formally analogous to the NMR2H label in polycrystalline proteins. In MOMD, parametercombinations
differing in complexity can be devised by monitoring tensor magnitude,
symmetry, and orientation.[39] This enables
a continuous range of scenarios, and thus comparison among different
systems, within the scope of the same general model. Thereby, the
problematic issues associated with previous 2H line shape
analyses (see above) are expected to be largely resolved.On
the basis of this reasoning, we recently developed MOMD[39] for the analysis of dynamic2H NMR
line shapes.[43] Our approach was applied
to C–CD3 dynamics in HP36 and an example of S–CD3 dynamics in the Streptomyces Subtilisin
Inhibitor (SSI).[43] The emerging physical
picture depicts the spin-bearing probe executing axially symmetric
diffusion (with rate constants R⊥ and R∥) in the presence of a
rhombic local potential given by the L = 2 and K = 0, 2 spherical harmonic functions (with coefficients c02 and c22). The axial diffusion frame, M, is tilted from the axial
quadrupolar tensor frame, Q, at 120° or nearly 110.5° (angle
βMQ). The physical processes consistent with these
geometric features are trans–gauche isomerization and methyl exchange, respectively. The uncertainty
of the results has been estimated at 10% forc02 and c22, 15% for
the motional rates, and 3% for the angle βMQ.[43]It is important to apply MOMD to additional
systems differing in
nature to test its generality. Also, one should determine whether
the parametercombination delineated above is appropriate in all cases.
If it is not, adequate parametercombinations need to be devised.
It is, in addition, insightful to compare MOMD analyses of different
systems. Finally, it is of interest to compare the MOMD-based pictures
with the corresponding multi-simple-mode-based pictures.These
are the objectives of the present study. Along these lines,
we apply MOMD to C–CD3 dynamics in the PS-adsorbed
LKα14 peptide[4] and in dimethylammoniumtetraphenylborate.[44] In addition, we apply
MOMD to C–D dynamics in the furanosering of HhaI methyltransferse target DNA[30] and benzene-6-hexanoate
in phase III.[45] The parametercombination
found suitable to describe 2H dynamics in HP36 and SSI
is also found suitable for describing 2H dynamics in the
systems investigated in this work. The quantitative analysis reveals
interesting new system-specific information.The six different
cases treated so far (four in this work and two
in the study where the MOMD/NMR was developed[43]) demonstrate the benefit and power of model generality. Future prospects
of this work include incorporation of magic angle spinning in the
MOMD formalism, application to 15N and 13C nuclei,
and further generalization of the MOMD model.MOMD[39,43] represents the limit of the two-body coupled-rotator
slowly relaxing local structure (SRLS) approach[36−38] where the slow
rotator is “frozen”, yielding random orientations of
the local director. In recent years, we applied SRLS to NMRrelaxation
from proteins in aqueous solution.[46−50] Thus, the same general physically relevant theoretical/computational
tool is now available for studying protein dynamics in the solid and
liquid states.A theoretical summary is provided in section . Results and discussion
are summarized in section . Ourconclusions
appear in section .
Theoretical Summary
The MOMD theory as applied
to NMR has been delineated in ref (43). A brief summary is given
below. Figure shows
the MOMD frame scheme for a deuterium nucleus. L is the space-fixed
laboratory frame. C is the local director frame fixed in the molecule.
M denotes the principal axes system (PAS) of the local ordering tensor, S, taken the same (for simplicity) as the PAS of the local
diffusion tensor, R. Q denotes the PAS of the quadrupolar
tensor. The M and Q frames are fixed in the probe.
Figure 1
MOMD frames: L - lab
frame, C - local director frame, M - PAS of
the local ordering/local diffusion tensor, Q - PAS of the quadupolar
tensor, Q, or the partially averaged-by-methyl-rotation
quadrupolar tensor, ⟨Q⟩. The Euler angles
ΩMQ are fixed. The Euler angles ΩCM are time-dependent. 2H NMR spectra are calculated for
every ΩLC and convoluted according to a random distribution.[43]
MOMD frames: L - lab
frame, C - local director frame, M - PAS of
the local ordering/local diffusion tensor, Q - PAS of the quadupolar
tensor, Q, or the partially averaged-by-methyl-rotation
quadrupolar tensor, ⟨Q⟩. The Euler angles
ΩMQ are fixed. The Euler angles ΩCM are time-dependent. 2H NMR spectra are calculated for
every ΩLC and convoluted according to a random distribution.[43]The Euler angles ΩCM (associated with the
orientation
and diffusion of the probe relative to the local director) are time-dependent.
The Euler angles ΩMQ = (αMQ, βMQ, γMQ) are time-independent. Given that
the Q frame is axially symmetric, one has γMQ = 0.
For simplicity, the angle αMQ is set equal to zero.
Thus, the orientation of ZM (main ordering/diffusion
axis) relative to ZQ (the known principal
axis of the quadrupolar tensor, or the partially averaged-by-methyl-rotation
quadrupolar tensor) is given by the polar angle, βMQ. Since there is no “macroscopic order”, one has to
calculate 2H spectra for every ΩLC, and
convolute the corresponding line shapes according to a random distribution.[43]The stochastic Liouville equation (SLE)
for the spin density matrix
is given by[31−43] is the superoperator for the orientation-dependent
spin Hamiltonian. ΓΩ is a Markovian operator
for the rotational reorientation of the spin-bearing moiety (probe),
with the Euler angles Ω → (α, β, γ)
(ΩCM in the notation above) representing the orientational
angles. P0(Ω) is the unique equilibrium
probability distribution of ΓΩ.A simple
form of the diffusion operator, ΓΩ, is[31]where R is the isotropicrotational diffusion rate, ∇Ω2 is the rotational diffusion operator
in the Euler angles, Ω, and T is the restoring
torque. The latter is equal to ∂u/∂β
for an axial restoring potential, e.g., u ≅
−3/2c02(cos β)2 (the
coefficient c02 is given in units of kBT). The expression of ΓΩ forrhombic diffusion tensor and rhombic potential is given in ref (32).In this study,
we are using an axial diffusion tensor, R, associated
in the absence of a restricting potential
with three decay rates, τ–1 = 6R⊥ + K2(R∥ – R⊥), where K = 0, 1, and 2 (K is
the order of the rank 2 diffusion tensor). R∥ and R⊥ are the
principal values of R; one may also define τ∥ = 1/(6R∥) and τ⊥ = 1/(6R⊥).For a uniaxial local director, one may expand the potential in
the complete basis set of the Wigner rotation matrix elements, D0,(0, θ, φ), which
are proportional to the spherical harmonics. One has[32]with u(θ, φ)
and c being dimensionless.
If only the lowest, L = 2, terms are preserved, one
obtains the real potential:[32,39]with c02 evaluating potential
strength and c22 potential rhombicity. This form of u(ΩCM) is used herein.[43]Local order parameters are defined as[32]For at least 3-fold symmetry around the local director, C,
and
at least 2-fold symmetry around the principal axis of the local ordering
tensor, ZM, only S02 ≡ ⟨D0,02(ΩCM)⟩ and S22 ≡ ⟨D0,22(ΩCM) + D0,–22(ΩCM)⟩ survive.[32] The Saupe scheme order parameters relate to
irreducible tensorcomponents, S02 and S22, as S = ((3/2)1/2S22 – S02)/2, S = −((3/2)1/2S22 + S02)/2, and S = S02.The diffusion operator of eq comprises the rate constant R (principal
value of the isotropic diffusion tensor) and the parameterc02 (coefficient of the axial potential). The (enhanced) diffusion operator
used in this study comprises the rate constants R⊥ and R∥ (principal
values of the axial diffusion tensor) and the parameters c02 and c22 (coefficients of the rhombic potential). The diffusion operator
ΓΩ is given in the M frame; the superoperator is given in the Q frame. Therefore,
in
solving the SLE (eq ), one has to convert the M frame into the Q frame. This is accomplished
by the Wigner rotation based on the angle βMQ.The solution of the SLE (eq ), with the appropriate forms of ΓΩ and P0(Ω), and the specified values
of Q (quadrupole constant), c02, c22, R⊥, R∥, and βMQ, represents the calculated MOMD spectrum.
Results and Discussion
The parameters c02, c22, R∥, and R⊥ are allowed to vary in
the data-fitting process; the angle βMQ is fixed
as delineated below.
General Assessments
Local
Spatial Restrictions
In ourrecent application
of MOMD to C–CD3 dynamics of leucineresidues of
HP36 and S–CD3 dynamics of a methionineresidue
of SSI, we determined c02 and c22 to be approximately 2–3 kBT.[43]2H line shapes from C2′–2H2 in HhaI methyltransferase target DNA have
been used in previous work to study furanosering dynamics.[30] The local spatial restrictions have been expressed
in terms of an axial potential, the coefficient of
which has been determined to be approximately 5 kBT.The dominant simple mode associated
with C–D and C–CD3 dynamics is
two-site exchange.[3−6,10,11,14,44,45] In this process, the population ratio, p1/p2, represents
implicitly the spatial restrictions (favoring one conformer over the
other). p1/p2 was found to range from 3/7 to 4/6 in
ref (4), from 2/8 to
3.8/6.2 in ref (5),
and from 2/8 to 1 in ref (45). In the extreme motional narrowing limit, one has 1/T2 = δ2 × (p1 × p2)/kex (δ, separation between chemical shifts; kex, exchange rate). For a rigid particle reorienting
diffusively in a strong potential given by u = −c02D0,02, one has in the extreme motional narrowing limit 1/T2 = Δ2 × (S02)2 × τ (Δ, anisotropic magnetic interaction; S02 = ⟨D0,02⟩, axial order parameter; τ, diffusive
correlation time). In this limit, p1 × p2 and (S02)2 may be considered
to be formally analogous. The p1/p2 values depicted above correspond to S02 = 0.45–0.63, which in turncorrespond[46] to c02 = 2–3 kBT.Thus, forC–D and C–CD3 dynamics in the
system investigated in this work, the coefficients c02 and c22 of the MOMD potentials are most likely on the order of 2–3 kBT.
Local Motion
The
multimode models yielded exchange
rates on the order of 5 × 102 to 5 × 106 (103–106) s–1 forC–D (C–CD3 with spinning methyl group) dynamics.
This is expected on the basis of Q ∼ 170 kHz
forC–D and ⟨Q⟩ ∼ 50
kHz (∼[1.5 cos2(110.5°) – 0.5] ×
170, where 110.5° is the tetrahedral angle corresponding to rCH = rCD = 1.115
Å)[43] forC–CD3.
In our previous application of MOMD to HP36 and SSI, we found that R⊥ is quite close to its rigid limit,
whereas R∥ is moderate to fast
on the dynamicC–CD3 time scale.[43] WhetherR⊥ and R∥ of othercases of C–CD3 dynamics, and instances of C–D dynamics, exhibit similar
patterns is to be determined.Note that R⊥ and R∥ are geometrically
related principal values of an axial diffusion tensor, R, the orientation of which is given by βMQ. If necessary,
the symmetry of Rcan be lowered (i.e., R ≠ R), and its orientation specified by αMQ and βMQ. The form of the local potential
(eq ), hence the complexity
(in terms of magnitude, symmetry, and orientation) of the local ordering
tensor, can also be enhanced. The single-mode description will still
be in effect. Within such a broad scope, implied by the tensorial
representation of the physical quantities, it is not necessary to
resort to multimode descriptions (which, in principle, can be implemented
in MOMD).
Local Geometry
The geometric feature
of particular
interest is the orientation of ZM relative
to ZQ, given by βMQ.
MOMD describes axial diffusive motion in the presence of a rhombic
potential, rather than simple (jump-type) motions.[43] However, from a geometric point of view, one may relate
βMQ to geometric features associated with relevant
simple motions, and view MOMD as enhanced versions of those motions.Figure A illustrates trans (left)–gauche (right) isomerization
in a polymethylenechain segment.[51] It
can be seen that the deuterium atom D1 in the gauche configuration assumes the orientation originally occupied by the
deuterium atom D2 in the trans configuration.
The configurational projection along the C–C bond (Figure B) illustrates the angular
minimum of 120° for (jump-type) trans–gauche isomerization. From the perspective of MOMD, the blue axes denote ZQ, the red axis denotes ZM, and βMQ describes theirrelative orientation.
Thus, βMQ = 120° is a physically plausible option
forC–D dynamics.
Figure 2
Trans (left)–gauche (right) isomerization illustrated for a polymethylene
chain segment. D1 and D2 denote the interconverting
deuterium atoms
(part A). Projection along the C–C bond of the trans and gauche configurations, illustrating the angular
minimum of 120° for the isomerization process. From the perspective
of MOMD, the blue axes denote ZQ, the
red axis denotes ZM, and βMQ is equal to 120° (part B).
Trans (left)–gauche (right) isomerization illustrated for a polymethylenechain segment. D1 and D2 denote the interconverting
deuterium atoms
(part A). Projection along the C–C bond of the trans and gauche configurations, illustrating the angular
minimum of 120° for the isomerization process. From the perspective
of MOMD, the blue axes denote ZQ, the
red axis denotes ZM, and βMQ is equal to 120° (part B).Figure illustrates
methyl exchange between two out of the fourcorners of the carbon
tetrahedron.[4] Within the scope of this
process, ZM (red) is tilted at 110.5°
from ZQ (blue). Thus, βMQ = 110.5° is a physically plausible option forC–CD3 dynamics.
Figure 3
Methyl jumps between two out of the four corners of the
carbon
tetrahedron, involving an angular change of 110.5°. From the
perspective of MOMD, the blue axes denote ZQ, the red axis denotes ZM, and βMQ is equal to 110.5°.
Methyl jumps between two out of the fourcorners of the
carbon
tetrahedron, involving an angularchange of 110.5°. From the
perspective of MOMD, the blue axes denote ZQ, the red axis denotes ZM, and βMQ is equal to 110.5°.In fitting the experimental data, we set first βMQ equal to 110.5 or 120°. If both values yield physically
relevant
and statistically appropriate (i.e., acceptable) results, the alternative
with the better statistics will be selected. If only one βMQ value yields acceptable results, that value is selected.
If none of these values yields acceptable results, βMQ is allowed to vary in the 90–130° range (the angle we
call βMQ has been found to be 108–112°
in ref (3), 32–90°
in ref (45), and 60–80°
in ref (52)). The digressions
from βMQ equal to 120 or 110.5° have been found
in this study to be relatively small (see below).
Error Estimates
The errors in the best-fit MOMD parameters
determined in this work are as follows: 3% in βMQ, 10% in c02 and c22, and 15% in R∥ and R⊥.
Illustrative Simulations
Figure A shows 2H line shapes obtained with c02 = 2.0, c22 = 3.5, βMQ = 110.5°, and motional rates as depicted. Dynamic powder
patterns similar to the red (R⊥ = 0.79 × 104 s–1 and R∥ = 6.31 × 104 s–1) and black (R⊥ = 0.79 ×
104 s–1 and R∥ = 63.1 × 104 s–1) spectra are
encountered in quite a few cases. These parameters belong to the predicted
ranges. Dynamic powder patterns similar to the green and blue spectra,
where R⊥ = 3.16 × 104 s–1 is quite fast, are encountered rarely.
Figure 4
2H MOMD spectra obtained for c02 = 2.0, c22 = 3.5, βMQ = 110.5°, and R⊥ and R∥ as
depicted. The diffusion rates are given in units of 104 s–1 (part A). 2H MOMD spectra obtained
for c02 = 2.2, R⊥ = 0.016 and
(a) c22 = 1.8 and R∥ = 2.0 in
units of 104 s–1; (b) c02 = 2.6 and R∥ = 3.16 in units of 104 s–1; and (c) c02 = 2.8 and R∥ in units of 104 s–1 (part B). In each
panel, the various colors designate the value of βMQ as follows: 90° (black), 100° (red), 110° (green),
120° (blue), and 130° (violet). Additional parameters used
include ⟨Q⟩ = 52.8 kHz and an intrinsic
line width of 1 kHz.
2H MOMD spectra obtained forc02 = 2.0, c22 = 3.5, βMQ = 110.5°, and R⊥ and R∥ as
depicted. The diffusion rates are given in units of 104 s–1 (part A). 2H MOMD spectra obtained
forc02 = 2.2, R⊥ = 0.016 and
(a) c22 = 1.8 and R∥ = 2.0 in
units of 104 s–1; (b) c02 = 2.6 and R∥ = 3.16 in units of 104 s–1; and (c) c02 = 2.8 and R∥ in units of 104 s–1 (part B). In each
panel, the various colors designate the value of βMQ as follows: 90° (black), 100° (red), 110° (green),
120° (blue), and 130° (violet). Additional parameters used
include ⟨Q⟩ = 52.8 kHz and an intrinsic
line width of 1 kHz.Figure B
shows
a set of dynamic2H powder patterns with c02 = 2.2, R⊥ = 1.6 × 102 s–1, c22, and R∥ as depicted, and
βMQ varying from 90 to 130° in steps of 10°
(see figure captions). Clearly, the 2H line shapes are
very sensitive to the rhombicity of the potential (c22), the parallel
diffusion rate (R∥), and the local
geometry (βMQ).The illustrative simulations
presented in this section apply to
deuterium nuclei executing axial local diffusion in a rhombic local
potential. Specifics of the local motion, e.g., the relation of the
local ordering/local diffusion frame to the local stereochemistry,
are determined by the system investigated (see below).
MOMD Analysis of PS-Adsorbed LKα14 Peptide;
C–CD3 Dynamics
As pointed out above, 2H line shapes from the peptide Ac-LKKLLKLLKKLLKL-OH (LKα14),
deuterated selectively at various leucine positions with [isopropyl-2H7], have been used extensively
to study physisorption onto biomineral surfaces (refs (4−6)). The samples L5, L8, L11, and L14 adsorbed onto
the apolarpolystyrene (PS) surface have been investigated in ref (4) (the numbers denote the
position of the isotope-labeled Leuresidue in the peptide sequence).
L8 has also been studied in its unbound (lyophilized) form, as well
as adsorbed onto the polar surface of carboxyl-functionalized gold
nanoparticles. The respective 2H spectra are shown by the
black traces in Figure A (see figure captions for specific designations). The spikes in
the center of Figure Ab and Ac are associated with residual HDO; they should be ignored.
Figure 5
Experimental
(black) and calculated (red) 2H NMR line
shapes of unbound LKα14 labeled with d7-Leu at position 8 (L8) (a); PS-adsorbed L5 (b); PS-adsorbed
L8 (c); PS-adsorbed L11 (d); and PS-adsorbed L14 (e). L8 adsorbed
onto carboxyl-functionalized gold nanoparticles (f). Reproduced with
permission from ref (4) (part A). 2H MOMD spectra that reproduce the experimental
line shapes of part A, obtained for βMQ = 120°
and the parameters depicted in the figure. The diffusion rates are
given in units of 104 s–1. Additional
parameters used include ⟨Q⟩ = 52.8
kHz and an intrinsic line width of 1 kHz (part B, a–f).
Experimental
(black) and calculated (red) 2H NMR line
shapes of unbound LKα14 labeled with d7-Leu at position 8 (L8) (a); PS-adsorbed L5 (b); PS-adsorbed
L8 (c); PS-adsorbed L11 (d); and PS-adsorbed L14 (e). L8 adsorbed
onto carboxyl-functionalized gold nanoparticles (f). Reproduced with
permission from ref (4) (part A). 2H MOMD spectra that reproduce the experimental
line shapes of part A, obtained for βMQ = 120°
and the parameters depicted in the figure. The diffusion rates are
given in units of 104 s–1. Additional
parameters used include ⟨Q⟩ = 52.8
kHz and an intrinsic line width of 1 kHz (part B, a–f).The red traces in Figure A represent the best-fit calculated
spectra obtained in ref (4) with the following model.
(1) The effective quadrupole constant, ⟨Q⟩,
is allowed to vary. (2) Two-site methyl exchange with an angular separation
of approximately 110° occurs. Its rate, kex, and the population ratio, p1/p2, are
allowed to vary. (3) The instantaneous Cα–Cβ bond executes equidistant jumps around its equilibrium
orientation on the surface of a cone with a half-angle of 10°.
The rate of this motion, kcone, is allowed
to vary. The contribution of the γ-deuteron is ignored in view
of low signal intensity.The experimental 2H spectrum
of the unbound peptide
(Figure Aa) could
not be reproduced satisfactorily with this model even when the cone
half-angle was also allowed to vary, and the contribution of the γ-deuteron
was accounted for.[5] The experimental 2H spectra shown in Figure Ab–Af (black traces) have been reproduced very
well (red traces).The MOMD spectra that constitute best-fits
to the experimental
spectra of ref (5) (black
traces in Figure A)
are shown in Figure B. Spectra 5Bb and Be (L5 and L14 adsorbed onto PS) on the one hand,
and spectra 5Bc and Bd (L8 and L11 adsorbed onto PS) on the other
hand, are considered to be the same. MOMD reproduces well the experimental
spectra, including the line shape shown in Figure Aa. The 2H spectra of L5 and L14
have been reproduced with βMQ = 120°, c02 = 2.2, c22 = 2.6, R⊥ = 1.6 × 102 s–1, and R∥ = 2.0 × 104 s–1. The 2H spectra of L8 and L11 feature reduced potential
strength (c02 = 2.0 instead of 2.2), reduced potential rhombicity
(c22 = 2.2 instead of 2.6), and enhanced R∥ (2.5 × 104 s–1 instead
of 2.0 × 104 s–1). βMQ and R⊥ are the same. The end-on
view of the helical structure of LKα14 depicted in ref (4) shows that L5 and L14 are
relatively close to the PS surface whereas L8 and L11 are farther
away from it. The MOMD description points to reduced spatial restrictions
and enhanced motional rate, R∥,
forLeu side chains located farther from the PS surface.Unbound
L8 (Figure Ba) differs
from PS-adsorbed L8 (Figure Bc). The potential form/symmetry changes
upon adsorption, and the local diffusion becomes more axial (i.e., R∥/R⊥ becomes larger). As indicated
above, the 2H spectrum of unbound L8 (Figure Aa) could not be reproduced
with the multimode models
of refs (4) and (5). Allowing the local potential
to be rhombic, and the local motion to be represented by a tensorial
quantity, appears to be very important in this case.The 2H spectrum of L8 adsorbed onto carboxyl-functionalized
gold nanoparticles (Figure Bf) was reproduced with βMQ = 110.5°.
It exhibits a potential form/symmetry that differs substantially from
both its unbound form (Figure Ba) and its PS-adsorbed form (Figure Bc). The axiality of the local diffusion
(R∥/R⊥) is similar for L8 adsorbed onto carboxyl-functionalized gold nanoparticles
and L8 adsorbed onto PS. However, the absolute values differ, with
both rates being twice slower for L8 adsorbed onto carboxyl-functionalized
gold nanoparticles. The polarity, and in general the chemical nature,
of the surface, is clearly an important factor in determining the
structural dynamics of the Leu side chains. R∥ is quite slow (1.3 × 104 s–1) for both unbound L8 and L8
adsorbed onto carboxyl-functionalized gold nanoparticles; R⊥ is substantially slower in the latter
sample (8.0 × 102 s–1 versus 2.0
× 103 s–1).Thus, MOMD reproduces
all of the experimental spectra shown by
the black traces in Figure A, quantifying structural dynamics in terms of the form of
the local potential, and the principal values and orientation of the
local diffusion tensor. The three different forms of L8 are compared
in terms of these qualifiers.The black traces in Figure represent experimental 2H spectra acquired in
ref (5) at room temperature
(RT) from L1, L4, L5, L7, L8, L11, L12, and L14 adsorbed onto PS and
from unbound L8 (the red traces represent the best-fit simulations
from ref (5)). We consider
the spectra of L1, L4, L7, L8, and L11 on the one hand, and L5 and
L14 on the other hand, to be the same.
Figure 6
Experimental 2H line shapes from L1, L4, L5, L7, L8,
L11, L12, and L14 adsorbed onto a polystyrene surface and unbound
L8 (black traces; the red traces represent the best-fit simulations
from ref (5)). Reproduced
from ref (5). Copyright
2010 PNAS.
Experimental 2H line shapes from L1, L4, L5, L7, L8,
L11, L12, and L14 adsorbed onto a polystyrene surface and unbound
L8 (black traces; the red traces represent the best-fit simulations
from ref (5)). Reproduced
from ref (5). Copyright
2010 PNAS.The spectrum of L12 is similar
to the spectrum of unbound L8. The
authors of ref (5) also
report sum frequency generation (SFG) experiments which yielded the
orientation of the leucine side chains relative to the surface normal.
Tilt angles of 30–48° for L4, L7, L8, and L11, 70°
for L1, 68–74° for L5 and L14, and 82° for L12 have
been determined with SFG. Except for L1 (the N-terminal residue of
the peptide, which might act from the perspective of Leu side-chain
dynamics more like residues farther away from the surface), the MOMD
results are consistent with the SFG results. That is, small and large
SFG-derived tilt angles correspond to different line shapes, and L12
is exceptional. All three groups are quantified in terms of potential
form and diffusion tensor. Reference (5) has singled out only L12 as exceptional based
on its outstandingly large cone half-angle (allowed to vary in ref (5)) agreeing with a very large
SFG-derived tilt angle.The parametercombination used in ref (5) is different from the parametercombination used
in ref (4). In ref (4), the parameters ⟨Q⟩, kex, p1/p2, and kcone have been allowed to vary; the cone half-angle, θ,
has been set equal to 10°, and the contribution of the γ-deuteron
has been ignored. In ref (5), the parameters p1/p2, ⟨Q⟩, θ,
and the percent contribution of the γ-deuteron have been allowed
to vary; kex has been fixed at 6 × 106 s–1 and kcone at 600 s–1. In yet another
study, L8 adsorbed onto PS and PS-COOH surfaces has been investigated
as a function of temperature in the −40 to +60 °Crange.[6] In that study, the parameters ⟨Q⟩, kcone, and p1/p2 have been allowed
to vary; kex has been fixed at 3 ×
106 s–1, the angle θ at 35°,
and the contribution of the γ-deuteron at 16%. Within the scope
of the analysis of ref (6), p1 and p2 exhibit different trends as a function of temperature for the PS-adsorbed
and PS-COOH-adsorbed peptide. In particular, above 20 °C, p1 and p2 diverge
forPS-adsorbed L8 and converge forPS-COOH-adsorbed L8. This has
been interpreted in terms of p1/p2 being consistent with the Boltzmannrelation p1/p2 = exp(−(E2 – E1)/kBT) (where E2 – E1 is the energy
difference between the site with population p2 and the site with population p1) forPS-COOH-adsorbed L8 but inconsistent forPS-adsorbed L8.The analyses in refs (4), (5), and (6) differ in the identity
of the fixed and allowed-to-vary parameters and the values of the
fixed parameters. Taken separately, each scenario is plausible; taken
together, ambiguities are encountered. Table shows the results obtained for L8 adsorbed
onto PS at 20 °C. Within the scope of the various analyses, kex varies by an order of magnitude, kcone by a factor of 5, θ by a factor of
3.5, and the contribution of the γ-deuteron is zero in ref (4) and 16% in refs (5) and (6).
Table 1
Best-Fit
Parameters Obtained for L8
Adsorbed onto the PS Surface at 20 °C in refs (4−6)a
ref
⟨Q⟩ (kHz)
kex (s–1)
kcone (s–1)
p1/p2
θ°
γ-deuteron
(4)
49
6 × 105
2 × 103
4/6
10*
(5)
47
6 × 106 *
6 × 102 *
3.6/6.4
11
16%
(6)
46
3 × 106 *
6 × 102
3.6/6.4
35*
16%*
Items designated
by asterisks
have been fixed in the respective calculations. The data of ref (6) have been obtained from 2H spectra obtained under magic angle spinning (MAS).
Items designated
by asterisks
have been fixed in the respective calculations. The data of ref (6) have been obtained from 2H spectra obtained under magic angle spinning (MAS).MOMD and the multimode models of
refs (4−6) can only be compared in general
terms. The MOMD model
consists of a single dynamic mode comprised of a rhombic potential
and an axial diffusion tensor. The multimode models of refs (4−6) are different versions of three independent simple
dynamic modes comprising high-symmetry (scalar) parameters.
MOMD Analysis of Furanose Dynamics in HhaI
Methyltransferase Target DNA; C–D Dynamics
Furanose
dynamics in HhaI methyltransferase target
DNA 2H-labeled at the C2′ position have been studied
with 2H line shape analysis.[30] The experimental 2H spectra of cytosines C6 and C8 in
the DNA sequence are shown by the black traces in Figure Aa and Ab, respectively. The
model utilized takes into account the global motion of the DNA and
the (independent) local motion of the furanosering. The global motion
consists of jumps with rate kex on the
surface of a cone with a half-angle of 20° centered at the helix
axis.
Figure 7
Experimental 2H line shapes from the 2H′
deuterons of the nucleotides C6 (a) and C8 (b) of the HhaI methyltransferase target DNA at a hydration level of 10% and 300
K. The calculated line shapes have been obtained as described in the
text. Reproduced with permission from ref (30) (part A). 2H MOMD spectra that reproduce
the experimental line shapes of part A, obtained for βMQ = 120° and the parameters depicted in the figure. The diffusion
rates are given in units of 104 s–1.
Additional parameters used include Q = 170 kHz and
an intrinsic line width of 1 kHz (part B).
Experimental 2H line shapes from the 2H′
deuterons of the nucleotides C6 (a) and C8 (b) of the HhaI methyltransferase target DNA at a hydration level of 10% and 300
K. The calculated line shapes have been obtained as described in the
text. Reproduced with permission from ref (30) (part A). 2H MOMD spectra that reproduce
the experimental line shapes of part A, obtained for βMQ = 120° and the parameters depicted in the figure. The diffusion
rates are given in units of 104 s–1.
Additional parameters used include Q = 170 kHz and
an intrinsic line width of 1 kHz (part B).The local motion is represented by C2′–2H2 moving with rate D rad2/s in the presence of an axial potential with coefficient
κ kBT. The experimental 2H spectra (black traces in Figure A) have been reproduced in ref (30) with kex = 1.0 × 104 s–1, D = 1.8 × 107 rad2/s, and κ = 5 kBT (blue traces in Figure A).Calculated
MOMD spectra which constitute good fits to the experimental
spectra of Figure A, and which reproduce the trend observed in going from C6 to C8,
are shown in Figure Ba and Bb. For the C6 nucleotide, MOMD analysis yielded c02 = 2.1, c22 = 3.0, R⊥ = 8.0 × 102 s–1, R∥ = 2.0 × 104 s–1, and βMQ = 120°. ForC8, all the parameters except forc02, which is equal to 2.2, are the same.The experimental spectrum
shown in Figure Ab
differs from the experimental spectrum
shown in Figure Aa
in the intensity of the central “peak” relative to the
intensity of the “horns”. This feature could be reproduced
by changing slightly the shape of the MOMD potential. Note that the
spectrum shown in Figure Aa, which could not be reproduced with the models of refs (4) and (5), is similar to the spectrum
shown in Figure Aa.
Once again, ourresults highlight the fact that allowing the local
potential to be rhombic is an important factor in rendering MOMD a
general approach.
MOMD Analysis of Dimethyl-d6 Ammonium Tetraphenylborate; N–CD3 Dynamics
2H line shape (and relaxation)
analysis has been used
to study the dynamics of the ammoniumcation, and a series of methylammoniumcations, in theirpolycrystalline salts with tetraphenylborate.[44] These compounds are particularly interesting
in view of the peculiar size and shape of the delocalized tetraphenylborate
anion. Here we focus on (CD3)2NH2B(C6H5)4, for which temperature-dependent
line shapes are given in ref (44). Figure A shows experimental spectra acquired at 245 (B), 270 (D), 275 (C),
and 320 (A) K. Spectrum 8AB has been reproduced in ref (44) as a rigid-limit powder
pattern with ⟨Q⟩ = 50 kHz. Spectrum
8AA has been interpreted to result from methyl exchange between two
sites with an angularchange of 118.4°, and ⟨Q⟩ = 45.8 kHz. Spectra 8AC and 8AD (and all of the spectra
acquired between 250 and 300 K) have been interpreted as a superposition
of spectra 8AA and 8AB, with temperature-dependent populations. It
was concluded that there are temperature-dependent distributions of
cations which do, and cations which do not, experience methyl exchange.
Figure 8
Experimental 2H line shapes from dimethyl-d6 ammonium tetraphenylborate acquired at 320 K (A), 245
K (B), 275 K (C), and 270 K (D). Spectrum B was simulated as a rigid-limit
powder spectrum with ⟨Q⟩ = 50 kHz.
Spectrum A was simulated with ⟨Q⟩ =
45.8 kHz and fast methyl exchange between two sites with an angular
separation of 118.4°. Reproduced with permission from ref (44) (part A) Copyright 1990
Walter de Gruyter GmbH. 2H MOMD spectra that reproduce
the experimental line shapes of part a, obtained for βMQ = 109.5° and the parameters depicted in the figure. The diffusion
rates are given in units of 104 s–1.
Additional parameters used include ⟨Q⟩
= 50 kHz and an intrinsic line width of 1 kHz. For convenience, the
experimental temperatures are also depicted (part B).
Experimental 2H line shapes from dimethyl-d6 ammonium tetraphenylborate acquired at 320 K (A), 245
K (B), 275 K (C), and 270 K (D). Spectrum B was simulated as a rigid-limit
powder spectrum with ⟨Q⟩ = 50 kHz.
Spectrum A was simulated with ⟨Q⟩ =
45.8 kHz and fast methyl exchange between two sites with an angular
separation of 118.4°. Reproduced with permission from ref (44) (part A) Copyright 1990
Walter de Gruyter GmbH. 2H MOMD spectra that reproduce
the experimental line shapes of part a, obtained for βMQ = 109.5° and the parameters depicted in the figure. The diffusion
rates are given in units of 104 s–1.
Additional parameters used include ⟨Q⟩
= 50 kHz and an intrinsic line width of 1 kHz. Forconvenience, the
experimental temperatures are also depicted (part B).The compound (CH3)2ND2B(C6H5)4 has also been studied
in ref (44). The 2H spectrum
obtained at 325 K has been reproduced with two-site exchange with
an angularchange of 103° (not shown).MOMD reproduces
the main features of the spectral evolution 8AB
→ 8AD → 8AC → 8AA within the scope of a single
mode. The respective simulations are shown in Figure B. All of the line shapes in this figure
have been obtained with βMQ = 109.5°, which
corresponds to methyl exchange between two corners of the positively
charged nitrogen ion tetrahedron. For the 270 K spectrum, MOMD yielded
a potential given by c02 = 1.9 and c22 = 2.9 and local
diffusion given by R⊥ = 1.3 ×
102 s–1 and R∥ = 3.16 × 104 s–1. Increasing the temperature to 275 K implied
a potential of a somewhat different form, and fasterR⊥ and R∥. For
the 320 K spectrum, MOMD yielded a further modified potential form,
the same R⊥ and substantially fasterR∥.By plotting ln R∥ as a function
of 1/T, we obtained an apparent activation energy
of 8 ± 0.2 kcal/mol. Taking the ratio c22/c02 as a measure
of rhombicity, one obtains 1.5, 1.5, and 1.7 at 270, 275, and 320
K, respectively. Larger potential rhombicity at higher temperature
was encountered in our previous MOMD-based study of Leu side-chain
dynamics in HP36.[43] We interpreted this
finding in terms of two axial structural components
contributing to the effective rhombic ordering tensor defined in terms
of c02 and c22. At lower temperatures, one of these components
partly “freezes out”, rendering the effective ordering
more axially symmetric. We offer this interpretation here as well.The 2H spectrum of (CH3)2ND2B(C6H5)4 at 325 K has been
reproduced with MOMD employing the same parameters as those used to
obtain Figure AA,
except that R∥ has been found to
be equal to 1.0 × 105 s–1 instead
of 3.2 × 105 s–1 (not shown).
MOMD Analysis of 2H Line Shapes
from Benzenehexa-6-hexanoate; C–D Dynamics
Benzene-n-alkanoates (where nrepresents the number
of carbon atoms in the alkanoatechain) are compounds that exhibit
extensive polymorphism in the solid state. The n =
6, 7, and 8 homologues have been studied previously with 13C and 2H line shape analysis, with the isotope labels
applied at different molecular positions.[45] The various experimental spectra have been reproduced by superposing
two-to-fourrhombic powder patterns. Each rhombic spectrum has been
interpreted as a motionally averaged spectrum ensuing from fast exchange
between two side chain conformers. Exchange between rapidly exchanging
pairs was considered to be slow. Temperature dependence has been interpreted
to reflect changes in the relative population of the superposed rhombic
spectra.While most of the 2H line shapes presented
in ref (45) exhibit
features typical of multicomponent spectra (e.g., multiple pairs of
“shoulders”, representing multiple “parallel”
orientations in powder distributions), the phase III spectra of BHA6 2H-labeled at the β-carbon position (BHA6-βd2) exhibit features consistent with a single dynamic mode (spectrum
shape, in general, and dominant spectral features, in particular,
that depend on the pulse separation in the quadrupole echo sequence[45] might emerge both from a single spectrum in
the slow-motional regime, as well as from two superposed fast-motional
spectra).Figure A, left
column, shows experimental spectra from BHA6-βd2 acquired
in phase IV at −46 °C and in phase III at −25,
−12, and 13 °C. The phase IV spectrum has been reproduced
as an isotropic powder pattern with 3/4×Q =
119 kHz. The phase III spectra have been interpreted in terms of two
superposed rhombic powder patterns with temperature-dependent relative
populations (Figure A, right column).
Figure 9
Experimental 2H line shapes from BHA6-βd2 in phase IV (−46 °C) and in phase III (−25,
−12,
and 13 °C) (upper left column). Calculated spectra obtained in
ref (45) by superposing
two rhombic powder patterns with temperature-dependent populations
as delineated in the text (upper right column). Reproduced with permission
from ref (45) (part
A). 2H MOMD spectra reproducing the experimental line shapes
shown in part A, left column, obtained for the parameters depicted
in the figure. They include the best-fit values of the potential coefficients c02 and c22; the best-fit values of the diffusion rates, R⊥ and R∥ given
in units of 104 s–1; and the fixed angles
βMQ. Additional parameters used include 3/4×Q = 119 kHz and an intrinsic line width of 1 kHz. For convenience,
the experimental temperatures (in °C) are also depicted (part
B).
Experimental 2H line shapes from BHA6-βd2 in phase IV (−46 °C) and in phase III (−25,
−12,
and 13 °C) (upper left column). Calculated spectra obtained in
ref (45) by superposing
two rhombic powder patterns with temperature-dependent populations
as delineated in the text (upperright column). Reproduced with permission
from ref (45) (part
A). 2H MOMD spectra reproducing the experimental line shapes
shown in part A, left column, obtained for the parameters depicted
in the figure. They include the best-fit values of the potential coefficients c02 and c22; the best-fit values of the diffusion rates, R⊥ and R∥ given
in units of 104 s–1; and the fixed angles
βMQ. Additional parameters used include 3/4×Q = 119 kHz and an intrinsic line width of 1 kHz. Forconvenience,
the experimental temperatures (in °C) are also depicted (part
B).The experimental spectra shown
in Figure A, left
column, have been reproduced with
MOMD in terms of a single dynamic mode characterized by rhombic local
potential and axial local diffusion (Figure B). 3/4×Q = 119 kHz
from the −46 °C phase IV spectrum has been used.
The strength of the local potential, estimated by c02, decreases
with increasing temperature. The rhombicity of the potential, as evaluated
by the ratio c22/c02, is 1.4, 1.4, and 1.7 at −25,
−12, and 13 °C, respectively. We offered above a general
qualitative interpretation to increasing potential rhombicity with
increasing temperature: two axial contributions to the local structural
restrictions at higher temperatures with one of them partly “freezing
out” at lower temperatures. We offer this interpretation here
as well.The perpendicular motional rate, R⊥, is relatively slow, however, with a sizable
effect on the analysis.
As expected, it increases with increasing temperature, ranging from
1.6 × 102 s–1 at −25 °C
to 2.5 × 102 s–1 at 13 °C.
An Arrhenius-type activation energy of 1.70 ± 0.24 kcal/mol has
been calculated for it. R∥ increases
from 2.0 × 104 s–1 at −25 °Cto 7.9 × 104 s–1 at 13 °C,
and an Arrhenius-type activation energy of 5.05 ±
0.71 kcal/mol has been calculated for this component.
The angle βMQ was found to be 100.5, 112.5, and 120.5°
at −25, −12, and 13 °C. This is the only example
where the angle βMQ had to be adjusted as a function
of temperature. This might reflect changes in the nature of the axial
contributions to the local spatial restrictions (see above), in addition
to their temperature-dependence.Thus, we found with MOMD analysis
that the temperature-dependent
spectra of BHA6-βd2 in phase III can be interpreted
in terms of a single dynamic mode (with small variations in the angle
βMQ). Motional rates, associated activation energies,
and the strength and rhombicity of the local potential at the 2H-labeled sites were determined. This picture is to be compared
with two independent exchange processes in their extreme motional
narrowing limit, having temperature-dependent relative populations.The following comments are in order. (1) We have treated in this
study C–D, C–CD3, and N–CD3 dynamics. Within a good approximation (maximum deviation 9.5°),
the main diffusion axes may be identified with relevant preceding
chemical bonds. (2) The MOMD-based reproduction of some of the experimental
spectra considered is not perfect. However, our objective has been
to determine whether key features of dynamic2H line shapes
from very different systems and experimental conditions can by reproduced
reasonably well with the same set of general and physically relevant
parameters. In general, this goal has been reached. Work aimed at
improving the agreement between theory and experiment without overfitting
the experimental data is in progress.
Conclusions
Quite a few systems (six in total) differing in nature have been
subjected to MOMD analysis. In all of these cases, the local potential,
given in units of kBT, was found to be weak. Typical values of the axial coefficient, c02, are 2.1–2.2. A particularly weak potential is associated
with BHA6-βd2 in phase III, where c02 = 1.8 at
13 °C. This might indicate intermolecular interactions that are
weaker than typically encountered in solids. The homologues BHA7 and
BHA8 form a discotic phase at higher temperatures; ourresults suggest
an inherent tendency of BHA6 to also do so.For the C–CD3Leu probe, the axial potential
coefficient, c02, varies at room temperature from 2.0 to 2.2
for both HP36, and LKα14 adsorbed onto a PS surface. Thus, the
strength of the local potential is similar for these two systems.
On the other hand, the rhombic potential coefficient, c22, varies
from 2.0 to 3.4 for HP36 and from 2.2 to 2.6 for LKα14 adsorbed
onto a PS surface. This is pointing to greater uniformity in the shape
of the local potential at the Leu side chains of the surface-adsorbed
peptide (note that we compare sets of fourcases associated with HP36
with fourcases associated with LKα14).The furanosering
of HhaI methyltransferase target
DNA, the methylammonium and dimethylammoniumcations, and BHA6-βd2 in phase III, exhibit relatively larger deviations of the
local potential at the 2H site from axiality as compared
to HP36 and LKα14.The diffusion rate, R⊥, is generally
small but not negligible. For the furanosering of HhaI methyltransferase target DNA, R⊥ is quite large (7.9 × 102 s–1),
in agreement with this outstandingly mobile structural element (cf.
ref (30)).The
diffusion rate R∥ ranges
from 1.3 × 104 to 7.9 × 104 s–1. The methylammonium and dimethylammoniumcations
and BHA6-βd2 in phase III exhibit relatively large R∥ values. They also exhibit relatively
large apparent activation energies: 8 ± 0.2 kcal/mol for the DMAcation and 5.05 ± 0.7 kcal/mol for BHA6-βd2 in
phase III.Two experimental line shapes−the 2H spectrum
of Met73 in Streptomyces Subtilisin Inhibitor[41] and the 2H spectrum of lyophilized
LKα14 labeled at position 8 (see above)−could not be
reproduced with the multi-simple-mode paradigm. They have been reproduced
with MOMD.The agreement between corresponding experimental
and MOMD-derived 2H line shapes can be improved in several
ways. One could vary
the angle αMQ in addition to the angle βMQ, include the L = 1 and L = 3 spherical harmonics in the expression for the local potential,
and/or devise additional potential forms. All of these enhancements
are associated with lowering the symmetry of the physical quantities
entering the model. However, to fit such detailed models would require
extensive sets of temperature-dependent 2H spectra.Prospects include the extension of MOMD so that it applies to 2H spectra recorded underMAS (in progress), and developing
MOMD for15N and 13C nuclei. Concerted SRLS
analysis of NMRrelaxation in solution and MOMD analysis of NMR line
shapes in the solid state for the same system is an important objective.
Authors: Michael F Brown; Maarten P Heyn; Constantin Job; Suhkmann Kim; Stephan Moltke; Koji Nakanishi; Alexander A Nevzorov; Andrey V Struts; Gilmar F J Salgado; Ingrid Wallat Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2007-10-23
Authors: Shadi Abu-Baker; Jun-Xia Lu; Shidong Chu; Clarke C Brinn; Christopher A Makaroff; Gary A Lorigan Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 3.162