Literature DB >> 26394858

A new 3-dimensional method for measuring precision in surgical navigation and methods to optimize navigation accuracy.

Christopher J Kleck1, Ian Cullilmore2, Matthew LaFleur3, Emily Lindley3, Mark E Rentschler2, Evalina L Burger3, Christopher M J Cain3, Vikas V Patel3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Description of a novel method for evaluation of pedicle screws in 3 dimensions utilizing O-arm(®) and StealthStation(®) navigation; identifying sources of error, and pearls for more precise screw placement.
METHODS: O-arm and StealthStation navigation were utilized to place pedicle screws. Initial and final O-arm scans were performed, and the projected pedicle probe track, projected pedicle screw track, and final screw position were saved for evaluation. They were compared to evaluate the precision of the system as well as overall accuracy of final screw placement.
RESULTS: Thoracolumbar deformity patients were analyzed, with 153 of 158 screws in adequate position. Only 5 screws were malpositioned, requiring replacement or removal. All 5 were breached laterally and no neurologic or other complications were noted in any of these patients. This resulted in 97 % accuracy using the navigation system, and no neurological injuries or deficits. The average distance of the screw tip and angle of separation for the predicted path versus the final pedicle screw position were analyzed for precision. The mean screw tip distance from the projected tip was 6.43 mm, with a standard deviation of 3.49 mm when utilizing a navigated probe alone and 5.92 mm with a standard deviation of 3.50 mm using a navigated probe and navigated screwdriver (p = 0.23). Mean angle differences were 4.02° and 3.09° respectively (p < 0.01), with standard deviations of 2.63° and 2.12°.
CONCLUSIONS: This new technique evaluating precision of screw placement in 3 dimensions improves the ability to define screw placement. Pedicle screw position at final imaging showed the use of StealthStation navigation to be accurate and safe. As this is a preliminary evaluation, we have identified several factors affecting the precision of pedicle screw final position relative to that predicted with navigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Free-hand; Navigation; O-arm; Pedicle screw

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26394858     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4235-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  43 in total

1.  Thoracic pedicle screw placement guided by computed tomographic measurements.

Authors:  R Xu; N A Ebraheim; M E Shepherd; R A Yeasting
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-06

2.  Stereotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  A S Youkilis; D J Quint; J E McGillicuddy; S M Papadopoulos
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement. Technical note.

Authors:  Langston T Holly; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  U R Liljenqvist; H F Halm; T M Link
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Analysis of CT-based navigation system for pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Scott D Hodges; Jason C Eck; Danette Newton
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine.

Authors:  L P Amiot; K Lang; M Putzier; H Zippel; H Labelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  U R Liljenqvist; T M Link; H F Halm
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  [Osteosynthesis of dorsal, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine with metallic plates screwed into vertebral pedicles and articular apophyses].

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; M Roy-Camille; C Demeulenaere
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 1.228

Review 9.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Nikolaos K Paschos; Emilios E Pakos; Angelos N Politis; Christina M Arnaoutoglou; Athanasios C Karageorgos; Avraam Ploumis; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using three-dimensional image guidance: experience in a large patient cohort.

Authors:  Eric W Nottmeier; Will Seemer; Phillip M Young
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy in terms of breach and reposition using a new intraoperative cone beam computed tomography imaging technique and evaluation of the factors associated with these parameters of accuracy: a series of 695 screws.

Authors:  Virginie Cordemans; Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse; Bernard G Francq; Christine Detrembleur; Olivier Cartiaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and lumbar spine instrumentation using navigation based on an intraoperative cone beam CT imaging system: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nathalie Pireau; Virginie Cordemans; Xavier Banse; Nadia Irda; Sébastien Lichtherte; Ludovic Kaminski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Rate and mode of screw misplacements after 3D-fluoroscopy navigation-assisted insertion and 3D-imaging control of 1547 pedicle screws in spinal levels T10-S1 related to vertebrae and spinal sections.

Authors:  Horst Balling; Thomas R Blattert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Pedicle Screw Placement Using Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation With Intraoperative 3D Imaging: A First In-Human Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Adrian Elmi-Terander; Gustav Burström; Rami Nachabe; Halldor Skulason; Kyrre Pedersen; Michael Fagerlund; Fredrik Ståhl; Anastasios Charalampidis; Michael Söderman; Staffan Holmin; Drazenko Babic; Inge Jenniskens; Erik Edström; Paul Gerdhem
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 5.  Preoperative planning for intraoperative navigation guidance.

Authors:  Shahbaaz A Sabri; Philip J York
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

6.  Metal artifacts in intraoperative O-arm CBCT scans.

Authors:  Juha I Peltonen; Touko Kaasalainen; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Feasibility and accuracy of a robotic guidance system for navigated spine surgery in a hybrid operating room: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Gustav Burström; Marcin Balicki; Alexandru Patriciu; Sean Kyne; Aleksandra Popovic; Ronald Holthuizen; Robert Homan; Halldor Skulason; Oscar Persson; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Feasibility and Accuracy of Thoracolumbar Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement With Augmented Reality Navigation Technology.

Authors:  Adrian Elmi-Terander; Rami Nachabe; Halldor Skulason; Kyrre Pedersen; Michael Söderman; John Racadio; Drazenko Babic; Paul Gerdhem; Erik Edström
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 3.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.