U R Liljenqvist1, T M Link, H F Halm. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Clinical Radiology, Westphalian Wilhelms-University, Münster, Germany. liljenqv@uni-muenster.de
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study on the morphometry of 337 pedicles in 29 patients with idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: To analyze by means of computed tomographic scans the vertebral morphometry in idiopathic scoliosis treated by pedicle screw instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although several studies exist on the vertebrae's morphometry in normal spines, little is known concerning the morphometry of scoliotic vertebrae. METHODS: The pedicles' morphometry between T5 and L4 was analyzed by computed tomographic scans in 29 surgically treated patients with idiopathic right thoracic scoliosis. Measurements included chord length, endosteal transverse pedicle width, transverse pedicle angle, and pedicle length. RESULTS: The endosteal transverse pedicle width was significantly smaller (P < 0.05) on the concavity in the apical region of the thoracic spine and measured between 2.5 and 4.2 mm in the middle thoracic spine (T5-T9) and between 4.2 and 5.9 mm in the lower thoracic spine (T10-T12). In the lumbar spine, the width varied between 4.8 and 9.5 mm without significant differences between the concave and convex sides (P > 0.05). The chord length was shortest at T5, measuring 37 mm and increased gradually to 50 mm at L3 with significantly larger dimensions in male patients and on the concavity of the apical region in the thoracic spine (P < 0.05). The pedicle length varied minimally, with a range of between 20 and 22 mm, and was relatively consistent throughout the thoracic and lumbar spine. The transverse pedicle angle varied between 6 degrees in the lower thoracic spine and 12 degrees in the upper thoracic and lower lumbar spine. CONCLUSION: The morphometry in scoliotic vertebrae is substantially different from that of vertebrae in normal spines, with an asymmetrical intravertebral deformity shown in scoliotic vertebrae. Pedicle screw instrumentation on the concavity in the apical region of thoracic curves appears critical because of the small endosteal pedicle width.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study on the morphometry of 337 pedicles in 29 patients with idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: To analyze by means of computed tomographic scans the vertebral morphometry in idiopathic scoliosis treated by pedicle screw instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although several studies exist on the vertebrae's morphometry in normal spines, little is known concerning the morphometry of scoliotic vertebrae. METHODS: The pedicles' morphometry between T5 and L4 was analyzed by computed tomographic scans in 29 surgically treated patients with idiopathic right thoracic scoliosis. Measurements included chord length, endosteal transverse pedicle width, transverse pedicle angle, and pedicle length. RESULTS: The endosteal transverse pedicle width was significantly smaller (P < 0.05) on the concavity in the apical region of the thoracic spine and measured between 2.5 and 4.2 mm in the middle thoracic spine (T5-T9) and between 4.2 and 5.9 mm in the lower thoracic spine (T10-T12). In the lumbar spine, the width varied between 4.8 and 9.5 mm without significant differences between the concave and convex sides (P > 0.05). The chord length was shortest at T5, measuring 37 mm and increased gradually to 50 mm at L3 with significantly larger dimensions in male patients and on the concavity of the apical region in the thoracic spine (P < 0.05). The pedicle length varied minimally, with a range of between 20 and 22 mm, and was relatively consistent throughout the thoracic and lumbar spine. The transverse pedicle angle varied between 6 degrees in the lower thoracic spine and 12 degrees in the upper thoracic and lower lumbar spine. CONCLUSION: The morphometry in scoliotic vertebrae is substantially different from that of vertebrae in normal spines, with an asymmetrical intravertebral deformity shown in scoliotic vertebrae. Pedicle screw instrumentation on the concavity in the apical region of thoracic curves appears critical because of the small endosteal pedicle width.
Authors: Christopher J Kleck; Ian Cullilmore; Matthew LaFleur; Emily Lindley; Mark E Rentschler; Evalina L Burger; Christopher M J Cain; Vikas V Patel Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Scott J Luhmann; Lawrence G Lenke; Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Mario Schootman Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 1.548
Authors: Amer F Samdani; Ashish Ranade; Daniel M Sciubba; Patrick J Cahill; M Darryl Antonacci; David H Clements; Randal R Betz Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 3.134