Literature DB >> 19119930

Placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using three-dimensional image guidance: experience in a large patient cohort.

Eric W Nottmeier1, Will Seemer, Phillip M Young.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The goal of this study was to analyze the placement accuracy and complications of thoracolumbar pedicle screws (PSs) inserted using 3D image guidance in a large patient cohort.
METHODS: The authors reviewed the charts of 220 consecutive patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion using 3D image guidance for instrumentation placement. A total of 1084 thoracolumbar PSs were placed using either the BrainLAB Vector Vision (BrainLAB, Inc.) or Medtronic StealthStation Treon (Medtronic, Inc.) image guidance systems. Postoperative CT scanning was performed in 184 patients, allowing for 951 screws to be graded by an independent radiologist for bone breach. All complications resulting from instrumentation placement were noted. Using the intraoperative planning function of the image-guided system, the largest diameter screw possible in each particular case was placed. The screw diameter of instrumentation placed into the L3-S1 levels was noted.
RESULTS: No vascular or visceral complications occurred as a result of screw placement. Two nerve root injuries occurred in 1084 screws placed, resulting in a 0.2% per screw incidence and a 0.9% patient incidence of nerve root injury. Neither nerve root injury was associated with a motor deficit. The breach rate was 7.5%. Grade 1 and minor anterolateral "tip out" breaches accounted for 90% of the total breaches. Patients undergoing revision surgery accounted for 46% of the patients in this study. Accordingly, 154 screws placed through previous fusion mass could be evaluated using postoperative CT scanning. The breach rate in this specific cohort was 7.8%. A total of 765 PSs were placed into the L3-S1 levels in this study; 546 (71%) of these screws were > or = 7.5 mm in diameter. No statistical difference in breach rate was noted in PSs placed through revision spinal levels versus nonrevision spinal levels (p = 0.499). Additionally, no increase in breach rate was noted with placement of 7.5-mm-diameter screws.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional image guidance is a useful adjunct to placement of spinal instrumentation. The complication rate in this study was low, and accurate placement of instrumentation was achieved despite the high percentage of revision surgery cases in our patient population. Additionally, because active fluoroscopy was not used for instrumentation placement, there was minimal to no radiation exposure to the surgeon or operating room staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19119930     DOI: 10.3171/2008.10.SPI08383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  30 in total

1.  Triggered electromyography for placement of thoracic pedicle screws: is it reliable?

Authors:  Amer F Samdani; Mark Tantorski; Patrick J Cahill; Ashish Ranade; Stephen Koch; David H Clements; Randal R Betz; Jahangir Asghar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Qi-Shan Huang; Ping Zhou; Yang Zhou; Rui-Kai Wu; Yi Lou; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A new 3-dimensional method for measuring precision in surgical navigation and methods to optimize navigation accuracy.

Authors:  Christopher J Kleck; Ian Cullilmore; Matthew LaFleur; Emily Lindley; Mark E Rentschler; Evalina L Burger; Christopher M J Cain; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw accuracy with a mini-open approach: a tomographic evaluation of 470 screws in 125 patients.

Authors:  José Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Luis Alberto Ortega-Porcayo; Carlos Francisco Gutiérrez-Partida; Luis Rodolfo Ramírez-Barrios; Ramses Uriel Ortíz-Leyva; Manuel Rodríguez-García; Oscar Sánchez-Escandón
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-10-23

5.  Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Pedicle morphometry for thoracic screw fixation in ethnic koreans : radiological assessment using computed tomographic myelography.

Authors:  Yong Soo Choi; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong-Joong Yi; Young-Joon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-10-31

7.  Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques.

Authors:  J Silbermann; F Riese; Y Allam; T Reichert; H Koeppert; M Gutberlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Reliability of the Planned Pedicle Screw Trajectory versus the Actual Pedicle Screw Trajectory using Intra-operative 3D CT and Image Guidance.

Authors:  Catherine A Miller; Charles G Ledonio; Matthew A Hunt; Farhan Siddiq; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-10-24

9.  Rate and mode of screw misplacements after 3D-fluoroscopy navigation-assisted insertion and 3D-imaging control of 1547 pedicle screws in spinal levels T10-S1 related to vertebrae and spinal sections.

Authors:  Horst Balling; Thomas R Blattert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine: comparison between free hand and a generic 3D-based navigation techniques.

Authors:  Yasser Allam; J Silbermann; F Riese; R Greiner-Perth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.