| Literature DB >> 26394692 |
Rebecca Deprez-Poulain1,2,3,4,5, Nathalie Hennuyer1,2,6, Damien Bosc1,2,3,4,5, Wenguang G Liang7, Emmanuelle Enée8, Xavier Marechal1,2,3,4,5, Julie Charton1,2,3,4,5, Jane Totobenazara1,2,3,4,5, Gonzague Berte1,2,3,4,5, Jouda Jahklal1,2,3,4,5, Tristan Verdelet1,2,3,4,5, Julie Dumont1,2,3,4,5, Sandrine Dassonneville1,2,3,4,5, Eloise Woitrain1,2,6, Marion Gauriot1,2,3,4,5, Charlotte Paquet1,2,6, Isabelle Duplan1,2,6, Paul Hermant1,2,3,4,5, François-Xavier Cantrelle9, Emmanuel Sevin10, Maxime Culot10, Valerie Landry1,2,3,4,5, Adrien Herledan1,2,3,4,5, Catherine Piveteau1,2,3,4,5, Guy Lippens9, Florence Leroux1,2,3,4,5, Wei-Jen Tang7, Peter van Endert8, Bart Staels1,2,6, Benoit Deprez1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) is a protease that cleaves insulin and other bioactive peptides such as amyloid-β. Knockout and genetic studies have linked IDE to Alzheimer's disease and type-2 diabetes. As the major insulin-degrading protease, IDE is a candidate drug target in diabetes. Here we have used kinetic target-guided synthesis to design the first catalytic site inhibitor of IDE suitable for in vivo studies (BDM44768). Crystallographic and small angle X-ray scattering analyses show that it locks IDE in a closed conformation. Among a panel of metalloproteases, BDM44768 selectively inhibits IDE. Acute treatment of mice with BDM44768 increases insulin signalling and surprisingly impairs glucose tolerance in an IDE-dependent manner. These results confirm that IDE is involved in pathways that modulate short-term glucose homeostasis, but casts doubt on the general usefulness of the inhibition of IDE catalytic activity to treat diabetes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26394692 PMCID: PMC4580987 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Use of TGS to design catalytic site inhibtors of IDE.
(a) Schematic view of IDE showing the catalytic site in yellow formed inside the catalytic chamber by the N- and C-terminal domains. The equilibrium between closed and open conformations is shown. (b) Principle of kinetic TGS: an azide-bearing hydroxamate warhead (ZBG-N3) and an alkyne are shown bound to the enzyme and reacting irreversibly to form a triazole. (c) IDE chooses reagents amongst a mixture of alkynes (d) The two azide-bearing hydroxamate warheads used in the experiment.
Figure 2Structure–activity relationships as function of substrates.
Compounds with coordinates (x, y) that show pIC50s measured with respectively labelled Aβ and native insulin as substrates for hIDE: Naphthyl compounds: 1 (blue dots); other 1, 4-triazoles (grey dots); 1, 5-triazoles 16–18 (open blue circles); oxadiazoles 11–12 (green dots); carboxylate analogue of the most active hydroxamate 14(orange dot). Phenyl compounds : 10, 19 (black dots). The structures of six representative compounds are depicted on the right.
Figure 3Structural and SAXS analyses of the interaction of hIDE with inhibitors.
(a–d) Detailed interactions of hIDE with compound 1 (BDM44768; PDB accession code 4NXO), (e) 10 (BDM44619; PDB accession code 4IFH), and (f) 16 (BDM71290; PDB accession code 4RE9) are displayed. hIDE is in surface (a) or ribbon (b–f) representation. Compound 1: C (cyan); Compound 10: C (purple); Compound 16: C (green); O (red); N (blue); F (light blue); zinc (deep grey sphere); N-terminal domain residues, (light grey); C-terminal domain residues (pink). Electrostatic potentials (a) that were calculated using APBS2.1, displayed using PyMol, and coloured from red (−1kT) to blue (+1kT). 2mFo-DFc map ((b) blue mesh), and mFo-DFc SA omit map ((c) green mesh) of hIDE bounded with compound 1 were contoured to 1σ and 2.5σ. SAXS analyses of the interaction of hIDE in the presence and absence of compound 1, depicted by their scattering profile (g: light scattering intensity as a function of q=(2πsinθ/λ in Å−1) and pair distribution function of scaterers in the real space derived from the scattering profile (h, including calculated radius of gyration Rg and the maximum linear dimension Dmax). The theoretical scattering profiles of closed (black) and open (magenta) states of hIDE dimer are shown in g. SAXS data fitting was performed with CRYSOL and P(r) distribution function was calcultated with GNOM.
Drug-like properties of 1.
| Log | A→B: 1 μM: 3.3 | ||
| Solubility (μM): 58.0 | 10 μM: 2.4 | ||
| Plasma stability | B→A: 1 μM: 19 | ||
| Plasma stability | 10 μM: 17 | ||
| Plasma stability | AUC0→4h (min μg ml−1): 256 | ||
| Microsomal stability |
IC50, half-maximal inhibitory concentration; h, human; hIDE, human insulin-degrading enzyme; m, mouse; hMMP-1, matrix metalloprotease 1; NEP, neutral endopeptidase; r, rat.
Selectivity of 1: values are means of two experiments minimum, s.d.±10%; substrate for IDE: native insulin; >10 μM stands for <10% at 10 μM. Physical properties and stability of 1; t1/2>24 h stands for 100% remaining compound at 24 h. Cell membrane permeability of 1 assessed on a Caco-2 cell monolayer; bidirectional transport was measured at 37 °C, for a time period of 1 h (pH: 7.4/7.4); Permeability classification: low=(Papp A→B)<1.0 × 10−6cm s−1; high=(Papp A→B)>1.0 × 10−6 cm s−1. Pharmacokinetic parameters for 1 (30 mg kg−1, ip) injected in male mice (n=3 for each time point) as a DMSO solution.
Figure 4Effect of 1 on C57BL/6J mice during insulin tolerance test.
C57BL/6J mice were treated with 1 at 50 mg kg−1 (blue lines) or with vehicle (grey lines) intraperitoneally and insulin tolerance test (ITT) was conducted by i.p. injection with 0.75 U kg−1 insulin on 5 h-fasted mice 15 min after intraperitoneal treatment. Blood glucose (a) and insulin (b) concentrations (1: blue bars; vehicle: grey bars) were measured at the indicated time points. Insert represents AUC (0–165). Data are mean±s.e.m (n=8 mice per group), two-sided t-test *P<0.05; **P<0.01 ; ***P<0.001. Liver and muscle (c) protein expression and insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of insulin receptor, Akt and ERK evaluated by western blot analysis. Actin was used as loading control. Liver or muscle were collected 15 or 5 min after insulin injection at 0.75 U kg−1 or 10 U kg−1, respectively.
Figure 5Acute in vivo effect of 1 in mice in an OGTT.
(a,c) Mice (WT and Ide−/− C57BL/6J) were treated with 1 at 50 mg kg−1 (blue line) or with vehicle (grey line) intraperitoneally. Plasma glucose concentrations measured immediately before inhibitor injection, corresponding to t=−15 min, immediately before oral glucose challenge (3 g kg−1, at t=0), and up to 180 min after it. Inserts represent AUC (−15 to 180). (b,d) : Insulin concentration measured in the same animals (WT and Ide−/− C57BL/6J) (1: blue bars; vehicle: grey bars) was measured at the indicated time points. One out of three independent experiments is shown. The experiment shown was performed as ‘cross-over', such that the group initially treated with vehicle was treated two days later with 1 and vice versa. Data are means±s.e.m (n=6 mice per group). two-sided t-test *P< 0.05; **P<0.01 ; ***P<0.001.
Figure 6Acute in vivo effect of 1 on NOD mice in an OGTT.
(a,c) Mice (WT and Ide−/− NOD) were treated with 1 at 50 mg kg−1 (blue line) or with vehicle (grey line) intraperitoneally, and plasma glucose concentrations measured before (−15 min) and after the oral glucose challenge (3 g kg−1, at t=0), inserts represent AUC (−15 to 180). (b,d) Insulinaemia measured in the same animals as in (a,c) NOD and Ide−/− respectively (1: blue bars; vehicle: grey bars) measured at the indicated time points. One out of three independent experiments is shown. Data are mean±s.e.m (n=6 mice per group). two-sided t-test *P<0.05; **P<0.01 ; ***P<0.001.
Figure 7Effect of 1 on blood glucose during oral and intraperitoneal glucose administration, and pyruvate challenge.
C57BL/6J mice were treated with 1 at 50 mg kg−1 (blue lines) or with vehicle (grey lines) intraperitoneally, and plasma glucose concentrations measured before (−15 min) and after (a) intraperitoneal (IP) glucose (1.5 g kg−1, at t=0), (b) oral glucose (2 g kg−1, at t=0), (c) pyruvate (2 g kg, at t=0). Inserts represent AUC (−15 to 120). (1: blue bars; vehicle: grey bars) measured at the indicated time points. Data are mean±s.e.m (n=6 mice per group). two-sided t-test *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.