| Literature DB >> 26394403 |
Yongmin Li1, Xiaoyou Wu2, Huabin Zhang2, Peng Yan2, Hui Xue2, Xiaobing Wu2.
Abstract
Paleogeological events and Pleistocene climatic fluctuations have had profound influences on the genetic patterns and phylogeographic structure of species in southern China. In this study, we investigated the population genetic structure and Phylogeography of the Odorrana schmackeri species complex, mountain stream-dwelling odorous frogs, endemic to southern China. We obtained mitochondrial sequences (1,151bp) of the complete ND2 gene and two flanking tRNAs of 511 individuals from 25 sites for phylogeographic analyses. Phylogenetic reconstruction revealed seven divergent evolutionary lineages, with mean pairwise (K2P) sequence distances from 7.8% to 21.1%, except for a closer ND2 distance (3.4%). The complex geological history of southern China drove matrilineal divergence in the O. schmackeri species complex into highly structured geographical units. The first divergence between lineage A+B and other lineages (C-G) had likely been influenced by the uplift of coastal mountains of Southeast China during the Mio-Pliocene period. The subsequent divergences between the lineages C-G may have followed the formation of the Three Gorges and the intensification of the East Asian summer monsoon during the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene. Demographic analyses indicated that major lineages A and C have been experienced recent population expansion (c. 0.045-0.245 Ma) from multiple refugia prior to the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Molecular analysis suggest that these seven lineages may represent seven different species, three described species and four cryptic species and should at least be separated into seven management units corresponding to these seven geographic lineages for conservation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26394403 PMCID: PMC4578928 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The geographic distribution of O. schmackeri species complex sampled in this study.
Localities are detailed in S1 Table. Populations are presented as pie-diagrams with slice-size proportional to the frequency of the major lineages. Colors of pie-diagrams correspond to the lineages in Figs 2 and 3.
Fig 2The Bayesian phylogenetic tree of O. schmackeri species complex based on the ND2+tRNA sequences.
Numbers above branches represent Bayesian posterior probability (PP). The estimated divergence times with a 95% HPD between the major clades are given in rectangular boxes.
Fig 3Haplotype networks and nested clade design for O. schmackeri species complex.
Colours represent different lineages. The haplotype codes correspond to S2 Table. Unsampled haplotypes were represented by small closed circles.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) among ND2+tRNA sequences of O. schmackeri species complex.
| Source of variation | Variance | % Total | Fixation indices |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 74.45503 | 98.43 |
| <0.0001 |
| Among populations within groups | 0.76201 | 1.01 |
| <0.0001 |
| Within populations | 0.42664 | 0.56 |
| <0.0001 |
Summary statistics observed in major lineages of O. schmackeri species complex.
| Lineage |
|
|
| Tajima’s | Fu’s | SSD | Raggedness index ( |
| Expansion time (Ma) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 199 | 46/0.888 | 0.00215 | -2.28730 | -80.486 | 0.00505 (0.16) | 0.03567 (0.37) | 2.695 | 0.245 |
| B | 111 | 21/0.618 | 0.00256 | -0.76300 | -19.261 | 0.04109 (0.50) | 0.05099 (0.77) | 9.555 | - |
| C | 71 | 17/0.644 | 0.00099 | -2.20992 | -22.841 | 0.07493 | 0.04332 (1.00) | 0.516 | 0.045 |
| D | 33 | 3/0.273 | 0.00073 | - | - | 0.09883 (0.03) | 0.66965 (0.49) | 3.000 | - |
| E | 57 | 3/0.070 | 0.00006 | - | - | 0.00003 (0.25) | 0.74690 (0.76) | 3.000 | - |
| F | 6 | 3/0.733 | 0.00122 | - | - | 0.03396 (0.53) | 0.13333 (0.76) | 2.037 | - |
* SSD sum of squared deviation, tau expansion parameter
** P<0.01
Mean genetic distances among different lineages of O. schmackeri species complex based on the Kimura 2-parameter model (lower-left), standard error (upper-right) estimated by bootstrap method (replication = 1000).
| Lineage | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.008 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.014 | |
| B | 0.079 | 0.015 | 0.016 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.016 | |
| C | 0.175 | 0.204 | 0.005 | 0.009 | 0.013 | 0.013 | |
| D | 0.176 | 0.206 | 0.034 | 0.008 | 0.014 | 0.013 | |
| E | 0.174 | 0.201 | 0.078 | 0.078 | 0.012 | 0.013 | |
| F | 0.175 | 0.196 | 0.164 | 0.164 | 0.157 | 0.010 | |
| G | 0.188 | 0.211 | 0.150 | 0.156 | 0.155 | 0.103 |
Fig 4Mismatch distributions for six major lineages of O. schmackeri species complex.
The dotted and thin lines represent the observed and expected mismatch distributions of a stationary population, respectively.