| Literature DB >> 22848532 |
Bin Wang1, Jianping Jiang, Feng Xie, Cheng Li.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The influence of Pleistocene climatic fluctuations on intraspecific diversification in the Qinling-Daba Mountains of East Asia remains poorly investigated. We tested hypotheses concerning refugia during the last glacial maximum (LGM) in this region by examining the phylogeography of the swelled vent frog (Feirana quadranus; Dicroglossidae, Anura, Amphibia). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22848532 PMCID: PMC3405020 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sampling information and haplotypes based on ND2 gene for 34 sampled populations of Feirana quadranus.
| Population | Location | n | Coordinates | Haplotypes |
| SZ | Sangzhi Co., Hunan Prov. | 5 | N29.6346°, E109.9232° | H1(2), H2(2), H3(1) |
| CY | Changyang Co., Hubei Prov. | 10 | N30.5853°, E110.9023° | H4(1), H5(2), H6(1), H7(1), H8(4), H9(1) |
| LC | Lichuan Co., Hubei Prov. | 4 | N30.5244°, E109.0946° | H17(4) |
| FJ | Fengjie Co., Chongqing City | 5 | N30.6168°, E109.4298° | H20(4), H21(1) |
| FA | Fangxian Co., Hubei Prov. | 1 | N31.9250°, E110.3231° | H24(1) |
| SN | Shennongjia, Hubei Prov. | 1 | N31.8211°, E110.5101° | H24(1) |
| WS | Wushan Co., Chongqing City | 3 | N31.3721°, E109.9074° | H26(2), H21(1) |
| WX | Wuxi Co., Chongqing City | 7 | N31.4804°, E109.9023° | H21(3), H24(1), H25(2), H27(1) |
| CK | Chengkou Co., Chongqing City | 24 | N32.0084°, E108.5349° | H13(1), H14(1), H15(1), H16(1), H18(1), H19(3), H28(1), H29(2), H30(1), H34(4), H35(7), H36(1) |
| KA | Kaixian Co., Chongqing City | 13 | N31.4051°, E107.8802° | H10(1), H11(7), H12(2), H22(1), H23(2) |
| LG | Langao Co., Shananxi Prov. | 3 | N32.1805°, E108.9288° | H30(1), H35(2) |
| ZB | Zhenba Co., Shananxi Prov. | 3 | N32.5774°, E107.9339° | H31(1), H32(2) |
| WY | Wanyuan Co., Sichuan Prov. | 3 | N32.0877°, E108.2387° | H17(1), H33(1), H35(1) |
| SY | Shanyang Co., Shananxi Prov. | 7 | N33.6501°, E109.9674° | H51(2), H58(5) |
| ZS | Zhashui Co., Shananxi Prov. | 14 | N33.7837°, E108.8367° | H55(1), H56(11), H57(1), H58(1) |
| CA | Chang’an Co., Shananxi Prov. | 1 | N33.7628°, E108.7731° | H46(1) |
| NS | Ningshan Co., Shananxi Prov. | 12 | N33.5482°, E108.5425° | H38(8), H44(1), H45(1), H47(1), H56(1) |
| FP | Foping Co., Shananxi Prov. | 11 | N33.6986°, E107.9491° | H38(8), H39(1), H40(1), H41(1) |
| TB | Taibai Co., Shananxi Prov. | 3 | N34.0573°, E107.5421° | H51(3) |
| ZZ | Zhouzhi Co., Shananxi Prov. | 4 | N33.7747°, E107.9742° | H38(2), H42(1), H43(1) |
| LX | Longxian Co., Shananxi Prov. | 1 | N34.9332°, E106.5798° | H53(1) |
| FX | Fengxian Co., Shananxi Prov. | 18 | N34.0983°, E106.5649° | H51(10), H70(7) |
| HX | Huixian Co., Gansu Prov. | 25 | N33.8963°, E105.8702° | H48(1), H49(1), H51(3), H63(1), H64(1), H65(6), H70(10), H71(1), H72(1) |
| LD | Liangdang Co., Gansu Prov. | 6 | N34.0021°, E106.3042° | H51(4), H70(2) |
| LB | Liuba Co., Shananxi Prov. | 5 | N33.7031°, E107.0848° | H51(4), H54(1) |
| YX | Yangxian Co., Shananxi Prov. | 6 | N33.5943°, E107.5387° | H37(1), H38(3), H50(1), H52(1) |
| LY | Lueyang Co., Shananxi Prov. | 4 | N33.2266°, E106.4017° | H70(4) |
| KX | Kangxian Co., Gansu Prov. | 2 | N33.2704°, E105.4367° | H70(2) |
| NZ | Nanzheng Co., Shananxi Prov. | 4 | N32.8446°, E106.8261° | H67(4) |
| NJ | Nanjiang Co., Sichuan Prov. | 6 | N32.5883°, E106.6750° | H66(1), H68(1), H69(4) |
| WE | Wenxian, Gansu Prov. | 6 | N32.7354°, E105.1841° | H61(3), H62(3) |
| QC | Qingchuan Co., Sichuan Prov. | 2 | N32.5778°, E104.7540° | H61(2) |
| BC | Beichuan Co., Sichuan Prov. | 1 | N31.7950°, E104.1262° | H60(1) |
| AX | Anxian Co., Sichuan Prov. | 4 | N31.7116°, E104.2656° | H59(4) |
Figure 1Locations of the 34 sampled populations of Feirana quadranus.
Details of the populations are given in Table 1, and the phylogenetic lineages are given in Figure 3.
Figure 3Bayesian tree for the 72 sampled haplotypes of Feirana quadranus based on ND2 gene sequences.
The bootstrap values calculated by Maximum Parsimony and Maximum Likelihood analyses and the Bayesian posterior probabilities from Bayesian analyses are presented above the main branches; the diamonds on branches mean that all support values are greater than 95%. The estimated divergence time (Ma, mean and 95% CI’s) for major nodes is below the branches. Ten major nodes (1–10) are indicated on the tree. Haplotypes (H1–H72) were given in Table 1.
Figure 2Models used to test refugial hypotheses for Feirana quadranus using coalescent simulations.
Four hypotheses concerning the refugia during the last glacial maximum (LGM) were tested. a) single-refugium hypothesis, T = 50 ka (LGM is called the Dali glaciation in China); b) two-refugia hypothesis, T = 4.6 Ma, T1 = 50 ka; c) three-refugia hypothesis, T = 4.6 Ma, T1 = 3.3 Ma, T2 = 50 ka; d) multiple-refugia hypothesis, T = 4.6 Ma, T1 = 3.3 Ma, T2 = 2.1 Ma, T3 = 1.8 Ma and T4 = 0.5 Ma. The detail interpretation for these models is given in the text. Branch lengths are time in generations based on a 2.5-year generation time in F. quadranus. Branch widths (effective female population size, N) are scaled for each group based on the proportion of the total N that each group comprised. Groups A–E occurred from six mountainous regions were given in Figure 1.
Figure 4TCS network of the 72 sampled haplotypes of Feirana quadranus based on ND2 gene sequences.
Haplotypes (H1–H72) correspond to Table 1. The relative sizes of the circles in the network are proportional to the haplotype frequencies (n), and the black dots represent missing haplotypes. The phylogenetic clades and lineages were given in Figure 3.
Genetic diversity and neutrality tests for phylogenetic lineages of Feirana quadranus.
| Lineages (n) |
|
| Tajima’s | Fu’s |
| Wuling (5) | 0.8000±0.1640 | 0.0097±0.006 | 1.6572 | 3.8033 |
| Easternmost Daba (10) | 0.8444±0.1029 | 0.0024±0.0016 | −0.0893 | −1.3403 |
| Daba (67) | 0.9498±0.0120 | 0.0059±0.0032 | −0.8622 | −7.8768 |
| Main Qinling (83) | 0.8190±0.0266 | 0.0027±0.0016 | −1.7820 | −10.0581 |
| Micang–Western Qinling (46) | 0.6599±0.0721 | 0.0016±0.0011 | −0.7854 | −2.9476 |
| Longmen (13) | 0.7564±0.0698 | 0.0035±0.0021 | 1.5586 | 2.7607 |
Phylogenetic lineages were given in Figure 3. Mean ± standard deviation of Hd and π were given.
P<0.05
P<0.01.
AMOVA analyses for different lineage arrangements of Feirana quadranus.
| Lineage arrangement | Among groups | Within groups | Within populations |
|
| 0.8117 | 0.5158 | 0.9088 |
|
| 0.7644 | 0.6989 | 0.9291 |
|
| 0.7182 | 0.7598 | 0.9323 |
|
| 0.5243 | 0.8834 | 0.9446 |
Lineages 1–6 were corresponding to Wuling, Easternmost Daba, Daba, Main Qinling, Micang–Western Qinling and Longmen lineages. P<0.01 for all AMOVA analyses.
Proportional likelihoods of the ancestral area for major lineages of Feirana quadranus.
| Node | Proportional likelihoods | |||||
| Wuling Mt. | Daba Mt. | Qinling Mt. | Western Qinling Mt. | Longmen Mt. | Micang Mt. | |
| 1 | 0.57 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| 2 | 0.98 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| 3 | 0.21 | 0.45 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.01 |
| 4 | 0.01 | 0.96 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| 5 | <0.01 | 0.98 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| 6 | <0.01 | 0.99 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| 7 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.99 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| 8 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.01 |
| 9 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 1 | <0.01 |
| 10 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 1 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Nodes 1–10 were given in Figure 3. Mt. means Mountains.
Figure 5Demographic patterns of each lineage and a combined pattern as determined from BSP.
The central solid line represents the median value for the log of the population size (N * τ) and the area between two thinner lines represent the 95% higher posterior density. The thicker dashed line represents the median of estimation time of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA), and the thinner is the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval. The combined figure shows the population size fluctuation after the lower limit of 95% CI’s of estimation time of the most recent common ancestor. Phylogenetic lineages correspond to Figure 3.