| Literature DB >> 23424644 |
Guohua Yu1, Mingwang Zhang, Dingqi Rao, Junxing Yang.
Abstract
Factors that determine the genetic structure of species in southwestern China remain largely unknown. In this study, phylogeography and demography of Tylototriton shanjing was investigated from a mitochondrial perspective to address the role of the Quaternary ice ages in shaping phylogeographic history and genetic diversity of Yunnan. A total of 146 individuals from 19 populations across the entire range of the species were collected. We detected four maternal phylogenetic lineages corresponding to four population groups, and found that major glaciation events during the Pleistocene have triggered the intra-specific divergence. Coalescent simulations indicated that the populations retreated to different refugia located in southern Yunnan, northwestern Yunnan, the border region of western Yunnan with Myanmar, and middle-western Yunnan, respectively, during previous glacial periods in the Pleistocene, and these four refugia were not retained during the Last Glacial Maximum. Population expansions occurred during the last inter-glaciation, during which ice core and pollen data indicated that the temperature and precipitation gradually increased, and declines of population sizes started after the beginning of the Last Glacial Maximum when the climate became cooler and dryer. The paleo-drainage system had no contribution to the current genetic structure and the rivers were not dispersal barriers for this salamander.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23424644 PMCID: PMC3570421 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sampling localities, phylogroup, sample sizes (N), haplotypes and their frequencies, gene diversity, nucleotide diversity, and the probability of being the population of origin of the lineage (MRCA %).
| Lineage | Population | Haplotypes present (number of individuals) |
| Haplotype diversity | Nucleotidediversity | MRCA % |
| A | Jinping (JP) | H1 (2), H2 (2), H3 (5), H4 (1) | 10 | 0.7333±0.1199 | 0.0015±0.0009 | 35.2 |
| A | Lvchun (LC) | H5 (4), H6 (3), H7 (1), H8 (3), H9 (1) | 12 | 0.8182±0.0703 | 0.0013±0.0008 | 63.9 |
| A | Zhangba (ZB) | H10 (1), | 1 | – | – | 1.9 |
| B | Peiliang (PL) | H26 (9), H27 (1) | 10 | 0.2000±0.1541 | 0.0001±0.0001 | 43.1 |
| B | Shuanghaizi (SHZ) | H28 (8), H29 (2) | 10 | 0.3556±0.1591 | 0.0002±0.0002 | 56.9 |
| C | Gangfang (GF) | H43 (5), H44 (2), H45 (1) | 8 | 0.6071±0.1640 | 0.0004±0.0004 | 7.46 |
| C | Pianma (PM) | H43 (7), H45 (5), H46 (2) | 14 | 0.6484±0.0813 | 0.0004±0.0003 | 46.07 |
| C | Guyong (GY) | H55 (1) | 1 | – | – | 46.47 |
| D | Wubulu (WBL) | H11 (1), H12 (3) | 4 | 0.5000±0.2652 | 0.0006±0.0006 | 16.334 |
| D | Shuangbai (SB) | H13 (10), H14 (2), H15 (1) | 13 | 0.4103±0.1539 | 0.0002±0.0002 | 3.03 |
| D | Jingdong (JD) | H13 (7), H16 (1), H17 (1), H18 (1) | 10 | 0.5333±0.1801 | 0.0020±0.0012 | 3.314 |
| D | Nanjian (NJ) | H19 (1) | 1 | – | – | 0.352 |
| D | Dayao (DY) | H13 (4), H20 (1), H21 (3), H22 (1), H23 (3), H24 (1), H25 (1) | 14 | 0.8681±0.0594 | 0.0019±0.0011 | 15.754 |
| D | Yongde (YD) | H30 (2), H31 (5), H32 (1), H33 (3), H34 (1), H35 (1) | 13 | 0.8205±0.0817 | 0.0018±0.0011 | 13.144 |
| D | Caojian (CJ) | H36 (1), H37 (1), H38 (1), H39 (1), H40 (1) | 5 | 1.0000±0.1265 | 0.0021±0.0014 | 0.686 |
| D | Shangjiang (SJ) | H41 (3), H42 (1) | 4 | 0.5000±0.2652 | 0.0008±0.0007 | 0.078 |
| D | Longling (LL) | H47 (2), H48 (2), H49 (1), H50 (2), H51 (3), H52 (1), H53 (1), H54 (1) | 13 | 0.9231±0.0500 | 0.0021±0.0012 | 21.32 |
| D | Mucheng (MC) | H56 (1), H57 (1) | 2 | 1.0000±0.5000 | 0.0017±0.0019 | 21.34 |
| D | Husa (HS) | H58 (1) | 1 | – | – | 4.646 |
| Total | 146 | 0.9608±0.0078 | 0.0097±0.0048 |
Figure 1Map showing the sampled populations of T. shanjing.
Height is reflected by shading and populations are named as in Table 1.
Figure 2Models of coalescent simulation used to test refugial hypotheses.
(a) Hypothesis of single refugium at the end of the Last Glacial Maximum (T = 18 000 years BP); (b) Hypothesis of two refugia at the end of the Last Glacial Maximum (T1 = 18 000 years BP, T = 830 000 years BP); (c) Hypothesis of three refugia at the end of the Last Glacial Maximum (T1 = 18 000 years BP, T2 = 760 000 years BP, T = 830 000 years BP); (d) Hypothesis of four refugia at the end of the Last Glacial Maximum (T1 = 18 000 years BP, T2 = 710 000 years BP, T3 = 760 000 years BP, T = 830 000 years BP); (e) Hypothesis of four refugia before the Last Glacial Maximum (T1 = 250 000 years BP, T2 = 290 000 years BP, T3 = 70 000 years BP, T4 = 530 000 years BP, T5 = 710 000 years BP, T6 = 760 000 years BP, T = 830 000 years BP). The detail interpretation for these models is given in the text.
Figure 3Bayesian inference tree for T. shanjing based on the 58 haplotypes from cytochrome b, control region, tRNA-Phe, and 12S rRNA sequences.
The nodal numbers are BPP and MP bootstrap value, respectively.
Figure 4Dated phylogeny and mass accumulation rate of loess.
(a) Simplified dated BEAST-derived tree showing divergence dates and TMRCA in Mya with 95% highest probability density (HPD) for major nodes and lineages within T. shanjing; (b) Changes in mass accumulation rate of loess deposits on the Chinese Loess Plateau since 0.9 Mya. The data were derived from Sun and An [74].
The results of SAMOVA for grouping of all populations and AMOVA for grouping of populations within lineage D.
| Grouping option | ΦST | ΦSC | ΦCT | Among groups | Among population within groups | Within populations |
| 2 groups [JP, LC, ZB, WBL, SB, JD, NJ, DY, PL, SHZ, YD, CJ, SJ, LL, MC, HS][GF, PM, GY] | 0.93097 | 0.85584 | 0.52115 | 52.11% | 40.98% | 6.9% |
| 3 groups [WBL, SB, JD, NJ, DY, PL, SHZ, YD, CJ, SJ, LL, MC, HS] [JP, LC,ZB] [GF, PM, GY] | 0.92294 | 0.79623 | 0.62184 | 62.18% | 30.11% | 7.71% |
| 4 groups [WBL, SB, JD, NJ, DY, YD, CJ, SJ, LL, MC, HS] [GF, PM, GY][PL, SHZ] [JP, LC, ZB] | 0.91787 | 0.60235 | 0.79346 | 79.35% | 12.44% | 8.21% |
| 5 groups [PL, SHZ] [GF, PM, GY] [JP, LC, ZB] [WBL] [SB, JD, NJ, DY, YD,CJ, SJ, LL, MC, HS] | 0.91562 | 0.56252 | 0.80712 | 80.71% | 10.85% | 8.44% |
| 6 groups [PL, SHZ] [MC] [GF, PM, GY] [WBL] [JP, LC, ZB] [SB, JD, NJ, DY,YD, CJ, SJ, LL, HS] | 0.91466 | 0.52669 | 0.81970 | 81.97% | 9.50% | 8.53% |
| 7 groups [PL, SHZ] [LC, ZB] [WBL] [SB, JD, NJ, DY, YD, CJ, SJ, LL, HS] [JP][MC] [GF, PM, GY] | 0.91379 | 0.49128 | 0.83053 | 83.05% | 8.33% | 8.62% |
| Lineage D: [WBL, SB, JD, NJ, DY, YD, CJ, SJ, LL, MC, HS] | 0.54666 | 54.67 | 45.33 | |||
| Lineage D: [SJ, LL, MC, HS] [CJ, YD] [JD, NJ, SB, WBL, DY] | 0.55219 | 0.53275 | 0.04161 | 4.16 | 51.06 | 44.78 |
| Lineage D: [SJ, LL, MC, HS] [CJ, YD] [JD, NJ] [SB, WBL] [DY] | 0.53320 | 0.65529 | –0.35416 | –35.42 | 88.74 | 46.68 |
P>0.05;
P<0.001.
Results of neutrality tests and mismatch analyses.
| Lineage | Neutrality tests | Mismatch distribution | ||||
| Fu’s Fs ( | Tajima’s | τ | SSD ( | Raggedness ( | Expansion time (Mya) | |
| A | 0.639 (0.607) | 0.287 (0.647) | 9.604 | 0.021 (0.234) | 0.035 (0.344) | – |
| B | –0.472 (0.317) | –0.094 (0.466) | 0.979 | 0.026 (0.099) | 0.184 (0.075) | – |
| C | 1.292 (0.776) | –1.948 (0.015) | 1.094 | 0.006 (0.452) | 0.048 (0.839) | – |
| C2 | 0.021 (0.479) | 0.461 (0.712) | 1.053 | 0.001 (0.711) | 0.052 (0.821) | |
| D | –16.513 (0.002) | –1.899 (0.010) | 6.156 | 0.003 (0.940) | 0.007 (0.932) | 0.119 |
| D2 | –15.782 (0.000) | –1.796 (0.013) | 6.648 | 0.003 (0.948) | 0.007 (0.937) | 0.129 |
Figure 5Bayesian skyline plots showing the demographic history of each lineage of T. shanjing.
Dark lines represent median values for the log10 of the population size, and blue lines represent the 95% highest probability density (HPD) intervals.
Figure 6S-values for 1000 simulated coalescent genealogies.
(a) Results from simulations within the single refugium hypothesis; (b) Results from simulations within the two refugia hypothesis; (c) Results from simulations within the three refugia hypothesis; (d) Results from simulations within the hypothesis of four refugia at the end of the Last Glacial Maximum; (e) Results from simulations within the hypothesis of four refugia before the Last Glacial Maximum. The black line represents the S-value for BI genealogy and dashed lines represent the 95% credible interval for the distribution.