Literature DB >> 26355805

Review of the cost of venous thromboembolism.

Maria M Fernandez1, Susan Hogue1, Ronald Preblick2, Winghan Jacqueline Kwong2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second most common medical complication and a cause of excess length of hospital stay. Its incidence and economic burden are expected to increase as the population ages. We reviewed the recent literature to provide updated cost estimates on VTE management.
METHODS: Literature search strategies were performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Collaboration, Health Economic Evaluations Database, EconLit, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 2003-2014. Additional studies were identified through searching bibliographies of related publications.
RESULTS: Eighteen studies were identified and are summarized in this review; of these, 13 reported data from the USA, four from Europe, and one from Canada. Three main cost estimations were identified: cost per VTE hospitalization or per VTE readmission; cost for VTE management, usually reported annually or during a specific period; and annual all-cause costs in patients with VTE, which included the treatment of complications and comorbidities. Cost estimates per VTE hospitalization were generally similar across the US studies, with a trend toward an increase over time. Cost per pulmonary embolism hospitalization increased from $5,198-$6,928 in 2000 to $8,764 in 2010. Readmission for recurrent VTE was generally more costly than the initial index event admission. Annual health plan payments for services related to VTE also increased from $10,804-$16,644 during the 1998-2004 period to an estimated average of $15,123 for a VTE event from 2008 to 2011. Lower costs for VTE hospitalizations and annualized all-cause costs were estimated in European countries and Canada.
CONCLUSION: Costs for VTE treatment are considerable and increasing faster than general inflation for medical care services, with hospitalization costs being the primary cost driver. Readmissions for VTE are generally more costly than the initial VTE admission. Further studies evaluating the economic impact of new treatment options such as the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants on VTE treatment are warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  costs; deep vein thrombosis; pharmacoeconomics; pulmonary embolism; resource utilization

Year:  2015        PMID: 26355805      PMCID: PMC4559246          DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S85635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1178-6981


  36 in total

1.  Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Harry R Büller; Hervé Décousus; Michael A Grosso; Michele Mercuri; Saskia Middeldorp; Martin H Prins; Gary E Raskob; Sebastian M Schellong; Lee Schwocho; Annelise Segers; Minggao Shi; Peter Verhamme; Phil Wells
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  ACC/AHA statement on cost/value methodology in clinical practice guidelines and performance measures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Anderson; Paul A Heidenreich; Paul G Barnett; Mark A Creager; Gregg C Fonarow; Raymond J Gibbons; Jonathan L Halperin; Mark A Hlatky; Alice K Jacobs; Daniel B Mark; Frederick A Masoudi; Eric D Peterson; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based study.

Authors:  John A Heit; W Michael O'Fallon; Tanya M Petterson; Christine M Lohse; Marc D Silverstein; David N Mohr; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-06-10

Review 4.  Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber; Henri Bounameaux
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Economic and utilization outcomes associated with choice of treatment for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Kevin K Knight; John Wong; Ole Hauch; Gail Wygant; Daniel Aguilar; Joshua J Ofman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Sam Schulman; Clive Kearon; Ajay K Kakkar; Patrick Mismetti; Sebastian Schellong; Henry Eriksson; David Baanstra; Janet Schnee; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Direct medical cost of managing deep vein thrombosis according to the occurrence of complications.

Authors:  Judith A O'Brien; Jaime J Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Hospital-based costs associated with venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens.

Authors:  Geno Merli; Cheryl P Ferrufino; Jay Lin; Mohammed Hussein; David Battleman
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Hospital-based costs associated with venous thromboembolism treatment regimens.

Authors:  G Merli; C Ferrufino; J Lin; M Hussein; D Battleman
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 10.  The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Richard H White
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  37 in total

1.  Evaluation of Anticoagulant Monitoring in Pediatric Patients Receiving Enoxaparin for Treatment of Venous Thrombosis.

Authors:  Jason Koury; Robert Hellinga; Jennifer Rose; Shirley Abraham; Anjali Subbaswamy
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-05-19

2.  Increased benefit of betrixaban among patients with a history of venous thromboembolism: a post-hoc analysis of the APEX trial.

Authors:  Megan K Yee; Tarek Nafee; Yazan Daaboul; Serge Korjian; Fahad AlKhalfan; Mathieu Kerneis; Cara Wiest; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Adrian F Hernandez; Russell D Hull; Alexander T Cohen; Robert A Harrington; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Surgical embolectomy for acute massive pulmonary embolism: state of the art.

Authors:  Alessandra Iaccarino; Giacomo Frati; Leonardo Schirone; Wael Saade; Elio Iovine; Mizar D'Abramo; Antonio De Bellis; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Ernesto Greco
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  A Caprini Risk Score-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Enoxaparin for the Thromboprophylaxis of Patients After Nonorthopedic Surgery in a Chinese Healthcare Setting.

Authors:  Yun Bao; Gang Zhao; Shuli Qu; Tengbin Xiong; Xingxing Yao; Bin Wu
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing for venous thromboembolism treatment.

Authors:  Emmeline Tran; Ashley Duckett; Sarah Fisher; Nicole Bohm
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Predictors of Venous Thromboembolism After Nonemergent Craniotomy: A Nationwide Readmission Database Analysis.

Authors:  Ian A Buchanan; Michelle Lin; Daniel A Donoho; Arati Patel; Li Ding; Arun P Amar; Steven L Giannotta; William J Mack; Frank Attenello
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Impact of Medicare's Nonpayment Program on Venous Thromboembolism Following Hip and Knee Replacements.

Authors:  Caroline P Thirukumaran; Laurent G Glance; Meredith B Rosenthal; Helena Temkin-Greener; Rishi Balkissoon; Addisu Mesfin; Yue Li
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Dalteparin or vitamin K antagonists to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a patient-level economic analysis for France and Austria.

Authors:  George Dranitsaris; Lesley G Shane; Jean-Philippe Galanaud; Gunar Stemer; Philippe Debourdeau; Seth Woodruff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Impact of an extended International Normalized Ratio follow-up interval on healthcare use among veteran patients on stable warfarin doses.

Authors:  Amanda R Margolis; Andrea L Porter; Carla E Staresinic; Cheryl A Ray
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.637

10.  Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Contemporary Approach to Diagnosis, Risk-Stratification, and Management.

Authors:  Tahir Tak; Swetha Karturi; Umesh Sharma; Lee Eckstein; Joseph T Poterucha; Yader Sandoval
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2019-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.