Literature DB >> 15877591

Economic and utilization outcomes associated with choice of treatment for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.

Kevin K Knight1, John Wong, Ole Hauch, Gail Wygant, Daniel Aguilar, Joshua J Ofman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hospital administrative data were analyzed to assess treatment patterns, in-hospital mortality, rates of hemorrhagic events and thrombus propagation, utilization of health care resources, and hospital costs associated with various treatments during inpatient care for venous thromboembolism (VTE). STUDY
DESIGN: Data from inpatient records were collected for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) encounters at 132 US hospitals between January 1999 and December 2000. Patients receiving the most frequently employed treatments were compared with respect to demographics, related procedures and diagnostics, length of stay, adverse events, in-hospital mortality, and hospital costs.
RESULTS: A total of 953 primary DVT and 3933 primary PE admissions were identified. Most admissions involved treatment with unfractionated heparin and vitamin K antagonist (UFH/VKA, 64.2% of admissions), followed by UFH with VKA and low-molecular-weight heparin (UFH/LMWH/VKA, 14.4%), and LMWH/VKA (12.9%). Compared with those treated with UFH/VKA, patients treated with LMWH/VKA experienced higher anticoagulant costs (dollar 540 vs. dollar 106), but lower total hospital costs (dollar 5198 vs. dollar 5977) and shorter lengths of stay (4.4 vs. 5.7 days for those without PE and 5.7 vs. 6.7 days for those with PE).
CONCLUSIONS: UFH/VKA was the most common regimen used to treat VTE. In spite of its higher medication cost, however, treatment with LMWH/VKA was associated with significantly shorter hospital stays and lower total hospitalization costs, compared with UFH/VKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15877591     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04026.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  7 in total

1.  Diagnostic imaging in the management of patients with possible cerebral venous thrombosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Dennis M Hedderich; José M Ferro; Wolfgang G Kunz
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Review of the cost of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Maria M Fernandez; Susan Hogue; Ronald Preblick; Winghan Jacqueline Kwong
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-08-28

3.  Health care disparities in the acute management of venous thromboembolism based on insurance status in the U.S.

Authors:  Gregory J Misky; Jonathan C Manheim; Nichole Zehnder; Vicky Nguyen; Paul F Swenson; Patrick Klem; Toby Trujillo; M A Earnest
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Minimizing costs for treating deep vein thrombosis: the role for fondaparinux.

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; William L Jackson; Lisa K Moores; Theodore E Warkentin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Simplifying thromboprophylaxis could improve outcomes in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Richard J Friedman
Journal:  Thrombosis       Date:  2010-09-13

6.  Cost-effectiveness of preventative therapies for postmenopausal women with osteopenia.

Authors:  Eric S Meadows; Robert Klein; Matthew D Rousculp; Lee Smolen; Robert L Ohsfeldt; Joseph A Johnston
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Length of Stay Comparison between Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: Results from a Real-World Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kirsten M Roberts; Tamara B Knight; Eimeira Padilla-Tolentino; Manasa Murthy; Evan J Peterson
Journal:  Thrombosis       Date:  2015-12-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.