Literature DB >> 30022482

Impact of Medicare's Nonpayment Program on Venous Thromboembolism Following Hip and Knee Replacements.

Caroline P Thirukumaran1, Laurent G Glance2, Meredith B Rosenthal3, Helena Temkin-Greener4, Rishi Balkissoon1, Addisu Mesfin1, Yue Li4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Medicare's Nonpayment Program was associated with decline in venous thromboembolism (VTE) following hip and knee replacements; and whether the decline was greater among hospitals at risk of larger financial losses from the Program. DATA SOURCES: State Inpatient Database for New York (NY) from 2005 to 2013. STUDY
DESIGN: The primary outcome was an occurrence of VTE. Medicare Utilization Ratio (MUR), which is the proportion of inpatient days in a hospital that is financed by Medicare, represented a hospital's financial sensitivity. We used hierarchical logistic regressions with difference-in-differences estimation to study the Program effects. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: A total of 98,729 hip replacement and 111,361 knee replacement stays were identified. For hip replacement, the Program was associated with significant reduction (Range: 44% to 53%) in VTE incidence among hospitals in MUR quartiles 2 to 4. For knee replacement, the Program was associated with significant reduction (47%) in VTE incidence only among quartile 2 hospitals.
CONCLUSION: Implementation of the Program was associated with a reduction in VTE, especially for hip replacements, in higher MUR hospitals. Payment reforms such as Medicare's Nonpayment Program that withhold payments for complications are effective and should be continued. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nonpayment program; hip and knee replacements; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30022482      PMCID: PMC6232432          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  37 in total

1.  Ending extra payment for "never events"--stronger incentives for patients' safety.

Authors:  Arnold Milstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Surveillance bias in outcomes reporting.

Authors:  Elliott R Haut; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Jonathan T Kolstad; Elizabeth A Stuart; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Impact of Medicare's Nonpayment Program on Hospital-acquired Conditions.

Authors:  Caroline P Thirukumaran; Laurent G Glance; Helena Temkin-Greener; Meredith B Rosenthal; Yue Li
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Meaningful use of electronic health record systems and process quality of care: evidence from a panel data analysis of U.S. acute-care hospitals.

Authors:  Ajit Appari; M Eric Johnson; Denise L Anthony
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Stephen L Kates; Jasvinder A Singh; Yue Li; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

9.  Relationship between occurrence of surgical complications and hospital finances.

Authors:  Sunil Eappen; Bennett H Lane; Barry Rosenberg; Stuart A Lipsitz; David Sadoff; Dave Matheson; William R Berry; Mark Lester; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber; Victor F Tapson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  2 in total

1.  Data resource profile: State Inpatient Databases.

Authors:  David Metcalfe; Cheryl K Zogg; Elliott R Haut; Timothy M Pawlik; Adil H Haider; Daniel C Perry
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Do penalty-based pay-for-performance programs improve surgical care more effectively than other payment strategies? A systematic review.

Authors:  Kyung Mi Kim; Wendy Max; Justin S White; Susan A Chapman; Ulrike Muench
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.