Literature DB >> 12141888

Direct medical cost of managing deep vein thrombosis according to the occurrence of complications.

Judith A O'Brien1, Jaime J Caro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has evolved from hospitalisation for intravenous heparin therapy to treatment options that include acute management as an outpatient. While efficacy and safety remain the principal basis for choosing a therapy, the economic consequences of that choice should be considered as well.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the average cost of various DVT management options from the perspective of US health payers.
DESIGN: Inpatient and outpatient management strategies were examined. Inpatient cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Edition, Clinical Modification codes and were classified into subgroups according to complication status. A cost estimate was developed by applying unit costs to the corresponding course of treatment. Cost estimates included initial acute care and that occurring in the following 6 months. Resource use profiles and unit costs were derived from several statewide inpatient, emergency room and ambulatory care databases supplemented by national fee schedules, published reports and peer-reviewed literature. All costs are reported in 1999 US dollars.
RESULTS: The mean 6-month treatment costs for inpatient management ranged from US dollars 3906 to US dollars 17,168, depending on complication status. For outpatient management, the cost ranged from US dollars 2394 to US dollars 3369, depending on frequency of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) injection and need for professional assistance.
CONCLUSIONS: The management strategy selected for DVT has an important economic impact. Self-administered LMWH in a homecare setting results in the lowest cost. However, as some patients either cannot, or will not, be treated this way, it is important for decision makers to consider the costs of other strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12141888     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220090-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  25 in total

1.  Nursing home residents: a multivariate analysis of their medical, behavioral, psychosocial, and service use characteristics.

Authors:  K G Manton; E S Cornelius; M A Woodbury
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 2.  Antigens involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  J Amiral
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.851

3.  Economic evaluation of outpatient treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin for proximal vein thrombosis.

Authors:  B O'Brien; M Levine; A Willan; R Goeree; S Haley; G Blackhouse; M Gent
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-10-25

4.  Pharmacy-managed program for home treatment of deep vein thrombosis with enoxaparin.

Authors:  P Dedden; B Chang; D Nagel
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 2.637

5.  Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  R D Hull; G E Raskob; J Hirsh; R M Jay; J R Leclerc; W H Geerts; D Rosenbloom; D L Sackett; C Anderson; L Harrison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The use of automated data to identify complications and comorbidities of diabetes: a validation study.

Authors:  K M Newton; E H Wagner; S D Ramsey; D McCulloch; R Evans; N Sandhu; C Davis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  How accurate are hospital discharge data for evaluating effectiveness of care?

Authors:  J Green; N Wintfeld
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Low-molecular-weight heparins compared with unfractionated heparin for treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis. A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  M K Gould; A D Dembitzer; G D Sanders; A M Garber
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-05-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Heparin-Induced thrombocytopenia: minimising the risks in the elderly patient.

Authors:  B Tardy-Poncet; B Tardy
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. The Tasman Study Group.

Authors:  M M Koopman; P Prandoni; F Piovella; P A Ockelford; D P Brandjes; J van der Meer; A S Gallus; G Simonneau; C H Chesterman; M H Prins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation and management of thromboprophylaxis in Moroccan hospitals at national level: the Avail-MoNa study.

Authors:  Z Tazi Mezalek; C Nejjari; L Essadouni; M Samkaoui; K Serraj; W Ammouri; N Kanjaa; Z Belkhadir; B Housni; M Awab; M Faroudy; W Bono; S Kabbaj; M Akkaoui; M Barakat; R Rifai; H Charaf; A Aziz; Y Elachhab; A Azzouzi
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Richard E Nelson; Kwame A Nyarko; Lisa C Richardson; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 3.  Review of the cost of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Maria M Fernandez; Susan Hogue; Ronald Preblick; Winghan Jacqueline Kwong
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-08-28

4.  Management of venous thromboembolism: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians.

Authors:  Vincenza Snow; Amir Qaseem; Patricia Barry; E Rodney Hornbake; Jonathan E Rodnick; Timothy Tobolic; Belinda Ireland; Jodi Segal; Eric Bass; Kevin B Weiss; Lee Green; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Cost effectiveness of tinzaparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  J Jaime Caro; Denis Getsios; Ingrid Caro; Judith A O'Brien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost and occurrence of thrombocytopenia in patients receiving venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following major orthopaedic surgeries.

Authors:  Laura Elizabeth Happe; Eileen Marie Farrelly; Richard H Stanford; Matt William Sarnes
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  The economic burden of supportive care of cancer patients.

Authors:  Linda S Elting; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Strategies for the management of suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Amanda R Patrick; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Jerry Avorn; Michael A Fischer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Economic burden of venous thromboembolism in surgical patients: A propensity score analysis from the national claims database in Vietnam.

Authors:  My Hanh Bui; Quang Cuong Le; Duc Hung Duong; Truong Son Nguyen; Binh Giang Tran; Tuan Duc Duong; Tien Hung Tran; Huu Chinh Nguyen; Thi Tuyet Mai Kieu; Hong Ha Nguyen; Long Hoang; Thanh Binh Nguyen; Thanh Viet Pham; Thi Hong Xuyen Hoang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reversible covalent direct thrombin inhibitors.

Authors:  Mohanram Sivaraja; Nicola Pozzi; Matthew Rienzo; Kenneth Lin; Timothy P Shiau; Daniel M Clemens; Lev Igoudin; Piotr Zalicki; Stephanie S Chang; M Angels Estiarte; Kevin M Short; David C Williams; Anirban Datta; Enrico Di Cera; David B Kita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.