Literature DB >> 2635479

Rod flicker perception: scotopic duality, phase lags and destructive interference.

L T Sharpe1, A Stockman, D I MacLeod.   

Abstract

Rod vision has a duality of organization: at mesopic luminances rod signals have access to a slow, sensitive pathway (which we refer to, following Stiles, as pi 0) and a fast, insensitive pathway (pi' 0). The phase lag between the two rod signals increases with frequency until at 15-Hz the rod signals transmitted through the two pathways emerge out-of-phase, so that destructive interference produces a nulling of the apparent flicker. Relative to the cones, the phase lag of pi' 0 is roughly half that of pi 0. Thus at 15-Hz pi' 0 signals can be out-of-phase with cone signals, so that the signals from the slower pathway, pi 0, are actually in phase with cone signals. We have investigated the frequency response, adaptation behavior and phase characteristics of the two rod processes. The slower process, pi 0 is more sensitive than pi' 0, and dominates from absolute threshold up to low mesopic levels. The adaptation of pi 0 seems not to be associated with a change in time constant, but rather with simple response compression or sensitivity scaling. The time constant of pi' 0, however, does change with adaptation. There are large differences in the way that light adaptation changes the sensitivity of the two processes: signals from pi'0 may evade part of the postreceptoral sensitivity regulating mechanism normally associated with rod vision. The ability of signals from pi 0 and pi' 0 to reinforce or cancel each other, however, suggests that they are later reunited in a common pathway.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2635479     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90137-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  26 in total

1.  An extended 15 Hz ERG protocol (1): the contributions of primary and secondary rod pathways and the cone pathway.

Authors:  Mieke M C Bijveld; Astrid M L Kappers; Frans C C Riemslag; Frank P Hoeben; Anne C L Vrijling; Maria M van Genderen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Flicker assessment of rod and cone function in a model of retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Glen R Rubin; Timothy W Kraft
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Linking impulse response functions to reaction time: rod and cone reaction time data and a computational model.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Andrew J Zele; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Parallel Processing of Rod and Cone Signals: Retinal Function and Human Perception.

Authors:  William N Grimes; Adree Songco-Aguas; Fred Rieke
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 6.422

5.  Rod-cone interactions and the temporal impulse response of the cone pathway.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Rod Photoreceptors Signal Fast Changes in Daylight Levels Using a Cx36-Independent Retinal Pathway in Mouse.

Authors:  Rose Pasquale; Yumiko Umino; Eduardo Solessio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.

Authors:  Yumiko Umino; Ying Guo; Ching-Kang Chen; Rose Pasquale; Eduardo Solessio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Temporal and spatial summation in the human rod visual system.

Authors:  L T Sharpe; A Stockman; C C Fach; U Markstahler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Combination of rod and cone inputs in parasol ganglion cells of the magnocellular pathway.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Barry B Lee; Hao Sun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Mutations in TRPM1 are a common cause of complete congenital stationary night blindness.

Authors:  Maria M van Genderen; Mieke M C Bijveld; Yvonne B Claassen; Ralph J Florijn; Jillian N Pearring; Francoise M Meire; Maureen A McCall; Frans C C Riemslag; Ronald G Gregg; Arthur A B Bergen; Maarten Kamermans
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.