Literature DB >> 17346763

Linking impulse response functions to reaction time: rod and cone reaction time data and a computational model.

Dingcai Cao1, Andrew J Zele, Joel Pokorny.   

Abstract

Reaction times for incremental and decremental stimuli were measured at five suprathreshold contrasts for six retinal illuminance levels where rods alone (0.002-0.2 Trolands), rods and cones (2-20 Trolands) or cones alone (200 Trolands) mediated detection. A 4-primary photostimulator allowed independent control of rod or cone excitations. This is the first report of reaction times to isolated rod or cone stimuli at mesopic light levels under the same adaptation conditions. The main findings are: (1) For rods, responses to decrements were faster than increments, but cone reaction times were closely similar. (2) At light levels where both systems were functional, rod reaction times were approximately 20 ms longer. The data were fitted with a computational model that incorporates rod and cone impulse response functions and a stimulus-dependent neural sensory component that triggers a motor response. Rod and cone impulse response functions were derived from published psychophysical two-pulse threshold data and temporal modulation transfer functions. The model fits were accomplished with a limited number of free parameters: two global parameters to estimate the irreducible minimum reaction time for each receptor type, and one local parameter for each reaction time versus contrast function. This is the first model to provide a neural basis for the variation in reaction time with retinal illuminance, stimulus contrast, stimulus polarity, and receptor class modulated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17346763      PMCID: PMC2063471          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  69 in total

1.  Sensitivity and dynamics of rod signals in H1 horizontal cells of the macaque monkey retina.

Authors:  J Verweij; D M Dacey; B B Peterson; S L Buck
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Rod-cone interactions assessed in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular postreceptoral pathways.

Authors:  H Sun; J Pokorny; V C Smith
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Brightness induction from rods.

Authors:  H Sun; J Pokorny; V C Smith
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Senescence of the temporal impulse response to a luminous pulse.

Authors:  Keizo Shinomori; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Visual reaction time: neural conditions for the equivalence of stimulus area and contrast.

Authors:  Kristian Donner; Petra Fagerholm
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The spatiotemporal precision of ganglion cell signals: a comparison of physiological and psychophysical performance with moving gratings.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Lukas Rüttiger; Barry B Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Some problems in vision regarded with respect to linearity and frequency response.

Authors:  L van der TWEEL
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1961-01-28       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Precision of spike trains in primate retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  V J Uzzell; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Rod pathways: the importance of seeing nothing.

Authors:  L T Sharpe; A Stockman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Neurophysiological interpretation of human visual reaction times: effect of contrast, spatial frequency and luminance.

Authors:  S Plainis; I J Murray
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  26 in total

1.  A method for estimating intrinsic noise in electroretinographic (ERG) signals.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Beatrix Feigl; Pradeep K Kambhampati; Amithavikram R Hathibelagal; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Threshold units: a correct metric for reaction time?

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Evidence for an attentional component in saccadic inhibition of return.

Authors:  David Souto; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Rod contributions to color perception: linear with rod contrast.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny; Vivianne C Smith; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Rod-cone interactions and the temporal impulse response of the cone pathway.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Black-white asymmetry in visual perception.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; George Sperling
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Isolated mesopic rod and cone electroretinograms realized with a four-primary method.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny; Michael A Grassi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Temporal modulation improves dynamic peripheral acuity.

Authors:  Jonathan A Patrick; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Electrophysiological measures of temporal resolution, contrast sensitivity and spatial resolving power in sharks.

Authors:  Laura A Ryan; Jan M Hemmi; Shaun P Collin; Nathan S Hart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Temporal characteristics of melanopsin inputs to the human pupil light reflex.

Authors:  Daniel S Joyce; Beatrix Feigl; Dingcai Cao; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.