Literature DB >> 8246186

Temporal and spatial summation in the human rod visual system.

L T Sharpe1, A Stockman, C C Fach, U Markstahler.   

Abstract

1. Absolute and increment thresholds were measured in a retinal region 12 deg temporal from the fovea with 520 nm targets of varying size and duration. Measurements were made under rod-isolation conditions in two normal observers and in a typical, complete achromat observer who has no cone-mediated vision. The purpose of these experiments was to determine how the temporal and spatial summation of rod-mediated vision changes with light adaptation. 2. The absolute threshold and the rise in increment threshold with background intensity depend upon target size and duration, but the psychophysically estimated dark light of the eye (the hypothetical light assumed to be equivalent to photoreceptor noise) does not. 3. The rise in increment threshold for tiny (10 min of arc), brief (10 ms) targets approaches the de Vries-Rose square-root law, varying according to the quantal fluctuations of the background light. The slope of the rod increment threshold versus background intensity (TVI) curves in logarithmic co-ordinates is about 0.56 +/- 0.04 (when cones are not influencing rod field adaptation). For large (6 deg) and long (200 ms) targets, a maximum slope of about 0.77 +/- 0.03 is attained. 4. The steeper slopes of the rod-detected TVI curves for large, long targets implies some reduction in temporal or spatial summation. In fact, the change in summation area is much more critical: under conditions where only the rod system is active the TVI curve slope is independent of target duration, suggesting that temporal summation is practically independent of background intensity. 5. The rise in threshold also depends on the wavelength of the background field in the normal observer but not in the achromat, confirming reports that the field adaptation of the rods is not independent of the quantal absorptions in the cones. The cone influence is most conspicuous on long-wavelength backgrounds and is found for all target sizes and durations, but is greater for large and long targets than for the other conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8246186      PMCID: PMC1175346          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  28 in total

1.  Visual response to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements.

Authors:  D H KELLY
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1961-04

2.  Variation of integrative actions in the retinal system; an adaptational phenomenon.

Authors:  G VAN DEN BRINK; M A BOUMAN
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1954-08

3.  Threshold setting by the surround of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  H B Barlow; W R Levick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The incremental threshold of the rod visual system and Weber's law.

Authors:  L T Sharpe; C Fach; K Nordby; A Stockman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-04-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Flux, not retinal illumination, is what cat retinal ganglion cells really care about.

Authors:  C Enroth-Cugell; R M Shapley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Rapid changes and hysteresis in spatial integration for human rod vision.

Authors:  P E Hallett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Scotopic increment thresholds in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  P Lennie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Rod pathways in mammalian retinae.

Authors:  N W Daw; R J Jensen; W J Brunken
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Counting every quantum.

Authors:  B Sakitt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The photocurrent, noise and spectral sensitivity of rods of the monkey Macaca fascicularis.

Authors:  D A Baylor; B J Nunn; J L Schnapf
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  8 in total

1.  Temporal summation in children with a history of retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz; Jena L Tavormina; Jennifer N Bush; Garima Soni; Anne B Fulton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  The dynamic receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Sophia Wienbar; Gregory W Schwartz
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 3.  The neural retina in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz; James D Akula; Anne B Fulton
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  Spatial relations of flicker signals in the two rod pathways in man.

Authors:  L T Sharpe; J Hofmeister; C C Fach; A Stockman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  The discovery of the ability of rod photoreceptors to signal single photons.

Authors:  Edward N Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Spatial Dissociation of Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits and Impaired Scotopic and Mesopic Sensitivity in AMD.

Authors:  Yuhua Zhang; SriniVas R Sadda; David Sarraf; Thomas A Swain; Mark E Clark; Kenneth R Sloan; William E Warriner; Cynthia Owsley; Christine A Curcio
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Increment Threshold Functions in Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Authors:  Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz; Jennifer N Bush; Anne B Fulton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Rapid Adaptation of Night Vision.

Authors:  Adam Reeves; Rebecca Grayhem; Alex D Hwang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.