Literature DB >> 2635477

Monocular motion sensing, binocular motion perception.

M A Georgeson1, T M Shackleton.   

Abstract

The two-process account of motion perception and its binocular organization were addressed in experiments on apparent movement (AM) with three types of grating: sinusoidal; random bar width; and square-wave with missing fundamental (MF). Monocular MF gratings sampled four times per cycle of drift always appeared to move backwards. Here AM was unrelated to the spatial appearance of the pattern, and followed the motion of the dominant spatial frequency component (the third harmonic). We take this reversed AM to be characteristic of "short-range" motion sensors. It did not occur dichoptically, implying that the direction-selective mechanism of motion sensors is purely monocular. AM was seen with dichoptic presentation for all three types of grating. Performance improved with the length of the stimulus sequence, as predicted by probability summation. This result reconciles previous positive and negative findings on dichoptic AM. The perceived direction of dichoptic AM was consistent with polarity-selective matching of features over time (the "long-range process"). The most telling effect supporting feature-matching in dichoptic motion was that dichoptic MF motion reversed direction with a change in the visible features of the pattern (induced by changes in contrast and pulse duration); monocular apparent motion did not. Two routes from spatial frequency channels to the perception of object motion are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2635477     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90135-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Induced motion at texture-defined motion boundaries.

Authors:  A Johnston; C P Benton; P W McOwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Feature matching and segmentation in motion perception.

Authors:  N E Scott-Samuel; M A Georgeson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The initial ocular following responses elicited by apparent-motion stimuli: reversal by inter-stimulus intervals.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; K J Chen; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Initial ocular following in humans depends critically on the fourier components of the motion stimulus.

Authors:  K J Chen; B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Initial ocular following in humans: a response to first-order motion energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; K J Chen; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The vergence eye movements induced by radial optic flow: some fundamental properties of the underlying local-motion detectors.

Authors:  Y Kodaka; B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Stereoscopic and contrast-defined motion in human vision.

Authors:  A T Smith; N E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  CUQI: cardiac ultrasound video quality index.

Authors:  Manzoor Razaak; Maria G Martini
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-03-14

10.  Human ocular following initiated by competing image motions: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; Y Kodaka; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.