Literature DB >> 16487988

Human ocular following initiated by competing image motions: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

B M Sheliga1, Y Kodaka, E J FitzGibbon, F A Miles.   

Abstract

The initial ocular following responses (OFRs) elicited by 1/4-wavelength steps applied to the missing fundamental (mf) stimulus are in the backward direction and largely determined by the principal Fourier component, the 3rd harmonic [Sheliga, B. M., Chen, K. J., FitzGibbon, E. J., & Miles, F. A. (2005). Initial ocular following in humans: A response to first-order motion energy. Vision Research, 45, 3307-3321]. When the contrast of the 3rd harmonic was selectively reduced below that of the next most prominent harmonic-the 5th, which moves in the opposite (forward) direction-then the OFR reversed direction and the 3rd harmonic effectively lost all of its influence as the OFR was now largely determined by the 5th harmonic. Restricting the stimulus to just two sine waves (of equal efficacy when of equal contrast and presented singly) with the spatial frequencies of the 3rd and 5th harmonics of the mf stimulus indicated that the critical factor was the ratio of their two contrasts: when of similar contrast both were effective (vector sum/averaging), but when the contrast of one was <1/2 that of the other then the one with the lower contrast became ineffective (winner-take-all). This nonlinear dependence on the contrast ratio was attributed to mutual inhibition and was well described by a weighted-average model with just two free parameters. Further experiments with broadband and dual-grating stimuli indicated that nonlinear interactions occur not only in the neural processing of stimuli moving in opposite directions but also of stimuli that share the same direction and differ only in their spatial frequency and speed. Clearly, broad-band and dual-grating stimuli can uncover significant nonlinearities in visual information processing that are not evident with single sine-wave stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16487988      PMCID: PMC2481408          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  72 in total

1.  Human speed perception is contrast dependent.

Authors:  L S Stone; P Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  D J Heeger
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Summation and division by neurons in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  M Carandini; D J Heeger
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-05-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Neural activity in cortical area MST of alert monkey during ocular following responses.

Authors:  K Kawano; M Shidara; Y Watanabe; S Yamane
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision.

Authors:  C D Salzman; W T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The effects of lateral geniculate nucleus, area V4, and middle temporal (MT) lesions on visually guided eye movements.

Authors:  P H Schiller; K Lee
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics.

Authors:  N Qian; R A Andersen; E H Adelson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Interactions between spatial frequency channels.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; L P Barfield
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  J A Movshon; I D Thompson; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Recovery of function after lesions in the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey.

Authors:  D S Yamasaki; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  21 in total

1.  Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The vergence eye movements induced by radial optic flow: some fundamental properties of the underlying local-motion detectors.

Authors:  Y Kodaka; B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): evidence for nonlinearities due to local and global inhibitory interactions.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The effects of prolonged viewing of motion on short-latency ocular following responses.

Authors:  Masakatsu Taki; Kenichiro Miura; Hiromitsu Tabata; Yasuo Hisa; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The initial disparity vergence elicited with single and dual grating stimuli in monkeys: evidence for disparity energy sensing and nonlinear interactions.

Authors:  K Miura; Y Sugita; K Matsuura; N Inaba; K Kawano; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Sensory versus motor loci for integration of multiple motion signals in smooth pursuit eye movements and human motion perception.

Authors:  Yu-Qiong Niu; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Difference in perceptual and oculomotor responses revealed by apparent motion stimuli presented with an interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Shizuka Nohara; Kenji Kawano; Kenichiro Miura
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  More is not always better: adaptive gain control explains dissociation between perception and action.

Authors:  Claudio Simoncini; Laurent U Perrinet; Anna Montagnini; Pascal Mamassian; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  The initial torsional Ocular Following Response (tOFR) in humans: a response to the total motion energy in the stimulus?

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.