Literature DB >> 15894346

Initial ocular following in humans: a response to first-order motion energy.

B M Sheliga1, K J Chen, E J Fitzgibbon, F A Miles.   

Abstract

Visual motion is sensed by low-level (energy-based) and high-level (feature-based) mechanisms. Ocular following responses (OFR) were elicited in humans by applying horizontal motion to vertical square-wave gratings lacking the fundamental ("missing fundamental stimulus"). Motion consisted of successive 1/4-wavelength steps, so the features and 4n+1 harmonics (where n=integer) shifted forwards, whereas the 4n-1 harmonics--including the strongest Fourier component (the 3rd harmonic)--shifted backwards (spatial aliasing). Initial OFR, recorded with the electromagnetic search coil technique, were always in the direction of the 3rd harmonic, e.g., leftward steps resulted in rightward OFR. Thus, the earliest OFR were strongly dependent on the motion of the major Fourier component, consistent with early spatio-temporal filtering prior to motion detection, as in the well-known energy model of motion analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15894346      PMCID: PMC1414793          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  61 in total

1.  Short-latency ocular following in humans: sensitivity to binocular disparity.

Authors:  G S Masson; C Busettini; D S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Version and vergence eye movements in humans: open-loop dynamics determined by monocular rather than binocular image speed.

Authors:  G S Masson; D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Contrast dependence of response normalization in area MT of the rhesus macaque.

Authors:  Hilary W Heuer; Kenneth H Britten
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  First-order and second-order motion: neurological evidence for neuroanatomically distinct systems.

Authors:  Lucia M Vaina; Sergei Soloviev
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Reversed short-latency ocular following.

Authors:  G S Masson; D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Short-latency ocular following in humans is dependent on absolute (rather than relative) binocular disparity.

Authors:  D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Visual mechanisms of motion analysis and motion perception.

Authors:  Andrew M Derrington; Harriet A Allen; Louise S Delicato
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 8.  Recasting the smooth pursuit eye movement system.

Authors:  Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Short-latency disparity-vergence eye movements in humans: sensitivity to simulated orthogonal tropias.

Authors:  D-S Yang; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  41 in total

1.  Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The initial ocular following responses elicited by apparent-motion stimuli: reversal by inter-stimulus intervals.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; K J Chen; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The effects of preceding moving stimuli on the initial part of smooth pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  Masakatsu Taki; Kenichiro Miura; Hiromitsu Tabata; Yasuo Hisa; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The vergence eye movements induced by radial optic flow: some fundamental properties of the underlying local-motion detectors.

Authors:  Y Kodaka; B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Inferring the future target trajectory from visual context: is visual background structure used for anticipatory smooth pursuit?

Authors:  Thomas Eggert; J Ladda; A Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effect of vergence on human ocular following response (OFR).

Authors:  Anand C Joshi; Matthew J Thurtell; Mark F Walker; Alessandro Serra; R John Leigh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): evidence for nonlinearities due to local and global inhibitory interactions.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The effects of prolonged viewing of motion on short-latency ocular following responses.

Authors:  Masakatsu Taki; Kenichiro Miura; Hiromitsu Tabata; Yasuo Hisa; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The initial torsional Ocular Following Response (tOFR) in humans: a response to the total motion energy in the stimulus?

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.