Literature DB >> 9744109

Stereoscopic and contrast-defined motion in human vision.

A T Smith1, N E Scott-Samuel.   

Abstract

There is considerable evidence for the existence of a specialized mechanism in human vision for detecting moving contrast modulations and some evidence for a mechanism for detecting moving stereoscopic depth modulations. It is unclear whether a single second-order motion mechanism detects both types of stimulus or whether they are detected separately. We show that sensitivity to stereo-defined motion resembles that to contrast-defined motion in two important ways. First, when a missing-fundamental disparity waveform is moved in steps of 0.25 cycles, its perceived direction tends to reverse. This is a property of both luminance-defined and contrast-defined motion and is consistent with independent detection of motion at different spatial scales. Second, thresholds for detecting the direction of a smoothly drifting sinusoidal disparity modulation are much higher than those for detecting its orientation. This is a property of contrast-modulated gratings but not luminance-modulated gratings, for which the two thresholds are normally identical. The results suggest that stereo-defined and contrast-defined motion stimuli are detected either by a common mechanism or by separate mechanisms sharing a common principle of operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9744109      PMCID: PMC1689333          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  34 in total

1.  Absence of smooth motion perception in color vision.

Authors:  K T Mullen; J C Boulton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Spatio-temporal requirements for binocular correlation in stereopsis.

Authors:  M J Lankheet; P Lennie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Computing stereo channels from masking data.

Authors:  A Glennerster; A J Parker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Nishida; T Ledgeway; M Edwards
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Sensitivity to second-order motion as a function of temporal frequency and eccentricity.

Authors:  A T Smith; T Ledgeway
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Enduring stereoscopic motion aftereffects induced by prolonged adaptation.

Authors:  C Bowd; D Rose; R E Phinney; R Patterson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Separate detection of moving luminance and contrast modulations: fact or artifact?

Authors:  A T Smith; T Ledgeway
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Just-noticeable difference in the speed of cyclopean motion in depth and the speed of cyclopean motion within a frontoparallel plane.

Authors:  C V Portfors; D Regan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Speed discrimination of stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion.

Authors:  R Patterson; M Donnelly; R E Phinney; M Nawrot; A Whiting; T Eyle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface.

Authors:  D H Kelly
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Induced motion at texture-defined motion boundaries.

Authors:  A Johnston; C P Benton; P W McOwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Human v6: the medial motion area.

Authors:  S Pitzalis; M I Sereno; G Committeri; P Fattori; G Galati; F Patria; C Galletti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 5.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.