Literature DB >> 10629979

Feature matching and segmentation in motion perception.

N E Scott-Samuel1, M A Georgeson.   

Abstract

We examined the role of feature matching in motion perception. The stimulus sequence was constructed from a vertical, 1 cycle deg-1 sinusoidal grating divided into horizontal strips of equal height, where alternate strips moved leftward and rightward. The initial relative phase of adjacent strips was either 0 degree (aligned) or 90 degrees (non-aligned) and the motion was sampled at 90 degrees phase steps. A blank interstimulus interval (ISI) of 0-117 ms was introduced between each 33 ms presentation of the stimulus frames. The observers had to identify the direction of motion of the central strip. Motion was perceived correctly at short ISIs, but at longer ISIs performance was much better for the non-aligned sequence than the aligned sequence. This difference in performance may reflect a role for feature correspondence and grouping of features in motion perception at longer ISIs. In the aligned sequence half the frames consisted of a single coherent vertical grating, while the interleaved frames contained short strips. We argue that to achieve feature matching over time, the long edge and bar features must be broken up perceptually (segmented) into shorter elements before these short segments can appear to move in opposite directions. This idea correctly predicted that overlaying narrow, stationary, black horizontal lines at the junctions of the grating strips would improve performance in the aligned condition. The results support the view that, in addition to motion energy, feature analysis and feature tracking play an important role in motion perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10629979      PMCID: PMC1690452          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

1.  Attention-based motion perception.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Motion detection is limited by element density not spatial frequency.

Authors:  R A Eagle; B J Rogers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Temporal properties of spatial contrast vision.

Authors:  M A Georgeson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A short-range process in apparent motion.

Authors:  O Braddick
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J R Bergen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion.

Authors:  O J Braddick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A comparison of varieties of "second-order" motion.

Authors:  J T Petersik
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception.

Authors:  C L Baker; O J Braddick
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The effect of similarity between line segments on the correspondence strength in apparent motion.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Model of human visual-motion sensing.

Authors:  A B Watson; A J Ahumada
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  1 in total

1.  The role of V1 surround suppression in MT motion integration.

Authors:  James M G Tsui; J Nicholas Hunter; Richard T Born; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.