Literature DB >> 26330030

Exploring student preferences with a Q-sort: the development of an individualized renal physiology curriculum.

John K Roberts1, Charles W Hargett1, Alisa Nagler2, Emma Jakoi3, Ruediger W Lehrich4.   

Abstract

Medical education reform is underway, but the optimal course for change has yet to be seen. While planning for the redesign of a renal physiology course at the Duke School of Medicine, the authors used a Q-sort survey to assess students' attitudes and learning preferences to inform curricular change. The authors invited first-year medical students at the Duke School of Medicine to take a Q-sort survey on the first day of renal physiology. Students prioritized statements related to their understanding of renal physiology, learning preferences, preferred course characteristics, perceived clinical relevance of renal physiology, and interest in nephrology as a career. By-person factor analysis was performed using the centroid method. Three dominant factors were strongly defined by learning preferences: "readers" prefer using notes, a textbook, and avoid lectures; "social-auditory learners" prefer attending lectures, interactivity, and working with peers; and "visual learners" prefer studying images, diagrams, and viewing materials online. A smaller, fourth factor represented a small group of students with a strong predisposition against renal physiology and nephrology. In conclusion, the Q-sort survey identified and then described in detail the dominant viewpoints of our students. Learning style preferences better classified first-year students rather than any of the other domains. A more individualized curriculum would simultaneously cater to the different types of learners in the classroom.
Copyright © 2015 The American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Q-sort; attitudes; curriculum; preferences; renal physiology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26330030      PMCID: PMC4747902          DOI: 10.1152/advan.00028.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  28 in total

1.  Q-methodology: a systematic approach to assessing learners in palliative care education.

Authors:  Charlene Gaebler-Uhing
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Developing Q-methodology to explore staff views toward the use of technology in nurse education.

Authors:  Odessa Petit dit Dariel; Heather Wharrad; Richard Windle
Journal:  Nurse Res       Date:  2010

3.  Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter?

Authors:  Susan Billings-Gagliardi; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  The assessment of a good teacher: student's paradigm.

Authors:  A Rajeev; C V Raguveer
Journal:  Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun

5.  The learning styles and the preferred teaching-learning strategies of first year medical students.

Authors:  Poonam Kharb; Prajna Paramita Samanta; Manisha Jindal; Vishram Singh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-04-22

6.  Career choice selection and satisfaction among US adult nephrology fellows.

Authors:  Hitesh H Shah; Kenar D Jhaveri; Matthew A Sparks; Joseph Mattana
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  The future nephrology workforce: will there be one?

Authors:  Mark G Parker; Tod Ibrahim; Rachel Shaffer; Mitchell H Rosner; Bruce A Molitoris
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  On becoming a nephrologist: medical students' ideas to enhance interest in a career in nephrology.

Authors:  Ankit B Patel; Michael S Balzer
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Mark McDaniel; Doug Rohrer; Robert Bjork
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2008-12-01

10.  Why not nephrology? A survey of US internal medicine subspecialty fellows.

Authors:  Kenar D Jhaveri; Matthew A Sparks; Hitesh H Shah; Seyyar Khan; Arun Chawla; Tejas Desai; Edward Iglesia; Maria Ferris; Mark G Parker; Donald E Kohan
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  4 in total

1.  Medical student attitudes toward kidney physiology and nephrology: a qualitative study.

Authors:  John K Roberts; Matthew A Sparks; Ruediger W Lehrich
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.606

2.  How do healthcare professionals respond to ethical challenges regarding information management? A review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Cornelius Ewuoso; Susan Hall; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Glob Bioeth       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 3.  Engaging medical students and residents in nephrology education: an updated scoping review.

Authors:  Charushree Prasad; Stephanie Sanger; Rahul Chanchlani; Amrit Kirpalani; Damien Noone
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.902

4.  Early clinical exposure program in learning renal physiology.

Authors:  Arman Dehghan; Mitra Amini; Mohammad Mahdi Sagheb; Seyed Mostafa Shidmoosavi; Parisa Nabeiei
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2017-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.