Literature DB >> 26328998

Technical Note: A Monte Carlo study of magnetic-field-induced radiation dose effects in mice.

Ashley E Rubinstein1, Zhongxing Liao2, Adam D Melancon3, Michele Guindani4, David S Followill3, Ramesh C Tailor3, John D Hazle5, Laurence E Court6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Magnetic fields are known to alter radiation dose deposition. Before patients receive treatment using an MRI-linear accelerator (MRI-Linac), preclinical studies are needed to understand the biological consequences of magnetic-field-induced dose effects. In the present study, the authors sought to identify a beam energy and magnetic field strength combination suitable for preclinical murine experiments.
METHODS: Magnetic field dose effects were simulated in a mouse lung phantom using various beam energies (225 kVp, 350 kVp, 662 keV [Cs-137], 2 MV, and 1.25 MeV [Co-60]) and magnetic field strengths (0.75, 1.5, and 3 T). The resulting dose distributions were compared with those in a simulated human lung phantom irradiated with a 6 or 8 MV beam and orthogonal 1.5 T magnetic field.
RESULTS: In the human lung phantom, the authors observed a dose increase of 45% and 54% at the soft-tissue-to-lung interface and a dose decrease of 41% and 48% at the lung-to-soft-tissue interface for the 6 and 8 MV beams, respectively. In the mouse simulations, the magnetic fields had no measurable effect on the 225 or 350 kVp dose distribution. The dose increases with the Cs-137 beam for the 0.75, 1.5, and 3 T magnetic fields were 9%, 29%, and 42%, respectively. The dose decreases were 9%, 21%, and 37%. For the 2 MV beam, the dose increases were 16%, 33%, and 31% and the dose decreases were 9%, 19%, and 30%. For the Co-60 beam, the dose increases were 19%, 54%, and 44%, and the dose decreases were 19%, 42%, and 40%.
CONCLUSIONS: The magnetic field dose effects in the mouse phantom using a Cs-137, 3 T combination or a Co-60, 1.5 or 3 T combination most closely resemble those in simulated human treatments with a 6 MV, 1.5 T MRI-Linac. The effects with a Co-60, 1.5 T combination most closely resemble those in simulated human treatments with an 8 MV, 1.5 T MRI-Linac.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328998      PMCID: PMC5148183          DOI: 10.1118/1.4928600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  24 in total

1.  Lung dosimetry in a linac-MRI radiotherapy unit with a longitudinal magnetic field.

Authors:  C Kirkby; B Murray; S Rathee; B G Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Truly hybrid X-ray/MR imaging: toward a streamlined clinical system.

Authors:  Arundhuti Ganguly; Zhifei Wen; Bruce L Daniel; Kim Butts; Stephen T Kee; Viola Rieke; Huy M Do; Norbert J Pelc; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Experimental verification of magnetic field dose effects for the MRI-accelerator.

Authors:  A J E Raaijmakers; B W Raaymakers; J J W Lagendijk
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Integrating a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: proof of concept.

Authors:  B W Raaymakers; J J W Lagendijk; J Overweg; J G M Kok; A J E Raaijmakers; E M Kerkhof; R W van der Put; I Meijsing; S P M Crijns; F Benedosso; M van Vulpen; C H W de Graaff; J Allen; K J Brown
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  First MR images obtained during megavoltage photon irradiation from a prototype integrated linac-MR system.

Authors:  B G Fallone; B Murray; S Rathee; T Stanescu; S Steciw; S Vidakovic; E Blosser; D Tymofichuk
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Towards adaptive IMRT sequencing for the MR-linac.

Authors:  Charis Kontaxis; G H Bol; J J W Lagendijk; B W Raaymakers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The ViewRay system: magnetic resonance-guided and controlled radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sasa Mutic; James F Dempsey
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

8.  Quality of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans Using a ⁶⁰Co Magnetic Resonance Image Guidance Radiation Therapy System.

Authors:  H Omar Wooten; Olga Green; Min Yang; Todd DeWees; Rojano Kashani; Jeff Olsen; Jeff Michalski; Deshan Yang; Kari Tanderup; Yanle Hu; H Harold Li; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Magnetic enhancement of electron dose distribution in a phantom.

Authors:  D P Whitmire; D L Bernard; M D Peterson; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Patient dosimetry for hybrid MRI-radiotherapy systems.

Authors:  C Kirkby; T Stanescu; S Rathee; M Carlone; B Murray; B G Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Biological effects of static magnetic field exposure in the context of MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jonathan Kim Mohajer; Andrew Nisbet; Eirini Velliou; Mazhar Ajaz; Giuseppe Schettino
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Radiation-induced lung toxicity in mice irradiated in a strong magnetic field.

Authors:  Ashley E Rubinstein; Skylar Gay; Christine B Peterson; Charles V Kingsley; Ramesh C Tailor; Julianne M Pollard-Larkin; Adam D Melancon; David S Followill; Laurence E Court
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.