Literature DB >> 17681781

A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer.

S J Lord1, W Lei, P Craft, J N Cawson, I Morris, S Walleser, A Griffiths, S Parker, N Houssami.   

Abstract

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as an additional screening test for young women at high risk of breast cancer in whom mammography alone has poor sensitivity. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of adding MRI to mammography with or without breast ultrasound and clinical breast examination (CBE) in screening this population. We found consistent evidence in 5 studies that adding MRI provides a highly sensitive screening strategy (sensitivity range: 93-100%) compared to mammography alone (25-59%) or mammography plus ultrasound+/-CBE (49-67%). Meta-analysis of the three studies that compared MRI plus mammography versus mammography alone showed the sensitivity of MRI plus mammography as 94% (95%CI 86-98%) and the incremental sensitivity of MRI as 58% (95%CI 47-70%). Incremental sensitivity of MRI was lower when added to mammography plus ultrasound (44%, 95%CI 27-61%) or to the combination of mammography, ultrasound plus CBE (31-33%). Estimates of screening specificity with MRI were less consistent but suggested a 3-5-fold higher risk of patient recall for investigation of false positive results. No studies assessed as to whether adding MRI reduces patient mortality, interval or advanced breast cancer rates, and we did not find strong evidence that MRI leads to the detection of earlier stage disease. Conclusions about the effectiveness of MRI therefore depend on assumptions about the benefits of early detection from trials of mammographic screening in older average risk populations. The extent to which high risk younger women receive the same benefits from early detection and treatment of MRI-detected cancers has not yet been established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17681781     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  66 in total

1.  Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for breast surgery planning.

Authors:  Sibel Ozkan Gurdal; Beyza Ozcinar; Munire Kayahan; Abdullah Igci; Mehtap Tunaci; Vahit Ozmen; Gulden Acunas; Ekrem Yavuz; Mustafa Kecer; Mahmut Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Q and a: magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and evaluation of breast cancer.

Authors:  Dana S Wollins; Mark R Somerfield
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Detection of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using unenhanced diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison with mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Hidetake Yabuuchi; Yoshio Matsuo; Shunya Sunami; Takeshi Kamitani; Satoshi Kawanami; Taro Setoguchi; Shuji Sakai; Masamitsu Hatakenaka; Makoto Kubo; Eriko Tokunaga; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; G M Giuseppetti; G Canavese; L Cataliotti; S Corcione; E Cossu; M Federico; L Marotti; L Martincich; P Panizza; F Podo; M Rosselli Del Turco; C Zuiani; C Alfano; M Bazzocchi; P Belli; S Bianchi; A Cilotti; M Calabrese; L Carbonaro; L Cortesi; C Di Maggio; A Del Maschio; A Esseridou; A Fausto; M Gennaro; R Girometti; R Ienzi; A Luini; S Manoukian; S Morassutt; D Morrone; J Nori; A Orlacchio; F Pane; P Panzarola; R Ponzone; G Simonetti; P Torricelli; G Valeri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Breast imaging in the young: the role of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening, diagnosis and follow-up.

Authors:  Dorria Saleh Salem; Rasha Mohamed Kamal; Sahar Mahmoud Mansour; Lamiaa Adel Salah; Rasha Wessam
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Imaging studies for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ingrid Schreer; Walter Heindel; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Adaptable near-infrared spectroscopy fiber array for improved coupling to different breast sizes during clinical MRI.

Authors:  Michael A Mastanduno; Fadi El-Ghussein; Shudong Jiang; Roberta Diflorio-Alexander; Xu Junqing; Yin Hong; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Accuracy of screening mammography in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia of the breast.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Linn A Abraham; Tracy Onega; Laura C Collins; Brian L Sprague; Deirdre A Hill; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  UK national survey of management of breast lobular carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  R Chester; O Bokinni; I Ahmed; A Kasem
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 10.  [Value of breast MRI as supplement to mammography and sonography for high risk breast cancer patients].

Authors:  T Schlossbauer; K Hellerhoff; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.