Literature DB >> 26328193

Does morbid obesity influence the success and complication rates of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones?

Onur Dede1, Nevzat Can Şener2, Okan Baş3, Gülay Dede4, Muhammet Şahin Bağbancı5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to investigate whether obesity influences the outcome of extra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment for upper ureteral stones.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 134 patients who underwent ESWL between June 2011 and May 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 94 patients of normal weight, and group 2 comprised 40 morbidly obese patients. Patients in both groups had upper ureteral stones.
RESULTS: The mean age of groups 1 and 2 was 45.6±12.1 and 45.3±15.5 years, respectively (p=0.98). There was no significant difference in demographic variables between the groups. The mean stone size in groups 1 and 2 was 81.7±25.7 mm(2) and 86.3±22.4 mm(2), respectively (p=0.51), the mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.4±2.9 and 42.9±2.1, respectively (p<0.01), the mean number of ESWL sessions was 2.4±0.6 and 2.4±0.7, respectively (p=0.97), and the mean follow-up time was 7.1±3.4 and 6.6±2.8 weeks, respectively (p=0.67). The overall stone-free rate was 82% in group 1 and 67% in group 2 (p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: It is well-known that morbidly obese patients have higher rates of anesthesia-related problems due to the comorbidities commonly observed in this population. In the current study, we found that ESWL is a safe and acceptable treatment option for morbidly obese patients with upper ureteral stones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Morbid obesity; shockwave lithotripsy; upper ureteral stone

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328193      PMCID: PMC4548659          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2015.94824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  21 in total

1.  Which is the best option to treat large (>1.5 cm) midureteric calculi?

Authors:  Suparu Khaladkar; Jayesh Modi; Manish Bhansali; Satyen Dobhada; Suresh Patankar
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 2.  The impact of obesity on surgical outcomes: a review.

Authors:  P S Choban; L Flancbaum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  J W Segura; G M Preminger; D G Assimos; S P Dretler; R I Kahn; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Joshua D Wiesenthal; Daniela Ghiculete; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

5.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones.

Authors:  Samuel Deem; Brian Defade; Asmita Modak; Mary Emmett; Fred Martinez; Julio Davalos
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones.

Authors:  E Erturk; E Herrman; A T Cockett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Recurrence after a single renal stone in a community practice.

Authors:  J W Sutherland; J H Parks; F L Coe
Journal:  Miner Electrolyte Metab       Date:  1985

8.  How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter.

Authors:  Dimitrios Delakas; Ioannis Karyotis; George Daskalopoulos; Emmanuel Lianos; Emmanuel Mavromanolakis
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Impact of obesity on ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy of urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  Ricardo Natalin; Keith Xavier; Zephaniah Okeke; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

View more
  4 in total

1.  Obesity and Kidney Stone Procedures.

Authors:  Nikhi P Singh; Carter J Boyd; William Poore; Kyle Wood; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2020

2.  Non-Contrast Computed Tomography Scan Based Parameters of Ureteric Stones Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Muhammad Waqas; Mohammad Ayaz Khan; Muhammad Waqas Iqbal; Mian Khalid Akbar; Imad-Ud-Din Saqib; Saeed Akhter
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-05

3.  By-products of lithotripsy: Are they related to abdominal fat and wave characteristics?

Authors:  Raed S M Al-Naemi; Haval Y Y Aldosky; Bayan S A Shukri
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-05

4.  Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, with modified position of the machine head in the treatment of lower calyceal stones in obese patients.

Authors:  Mohamed Abou-Farha; Ahmed El-Abd; Tarek Gameel; Hassan Eltatawy; Salah Nagla
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2022-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.