| Literature DB >> 31435406 |
Raed S M Al-Naemi1, Haval Y Y Aldosky2, Bayan S A Shukri1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the correlations between by-products of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and some physical parameters such as abdominal fat, energy levels, and shock wave pulses.Entities:
Keywords: Abdominal fat; Ketones; Malondialdehyde; Obesity; Shock wave lithotripsy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31435406 PMCID: PMC6694947 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.01.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Taibah Univ Med Sci ISSN: 1658-3612
Patients' anthropometric data, body fat characteristics, and shock wave properties.
| Parameters | Total (N = 40) | Male patients (n = 20) | Female patients (n = 20) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 37.18 ± 10.64 | 33.25 ± 6.51 | 41.1 ± 12.54 | <0.05 |
| Height (cm) | 165.03 ± 8.24 | 171.61 ± 5.108 | 158.45 ± 4.696 | <0.05 |
| Weight (kg) | 77.52 ± 14.39 | 83.4 ± 14.78 | 71.65 ± 11.56 | <0.05 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.06 ± 4.37 | 28.48 ± 4.71 | 28.55 ± 4.28 | NS |
| Abdominal fat (kg) | 10.07 ± 0.69 | 11.4 ± 4.25 | 9 ± 3.31 | <0.05 |
| Energy level (J) | 3.78 ± 0.67 | 3.89 ± 0.72 | 3.66 ± 0.62 | NS |
| Shock wave pulses (pulses/min) | 2229 ± 430 | 2091 ± 470 | 2375 ± 342 | NS |
Values are presented as means ± standard deviations.
SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index.
t-test, correlation is significant at the P < 0.05 level. NS, non-significant.
Statistical analysis of urinary measurement data pre- and post-ESWL.
| Parameters | Pre-ESWL | Post-ESWL | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDA (μmol/L) | 5414.1 ± 1896.8 | 9096.7 ± 2587.2 | <0.05 |
| Ketones (mg/dL) | 10.73 ± 23.58 | 28.1 ± 32.74 | <0.05 |
| Protein (mg/L) | 37.45 ± 17.51 | 45.78 ± 41.83 | NS |
Values are presented as means ± standard deviations.
ESWL, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; SD, standard deviation; MDA, malondialdehyde.
t-test, correlation is significant at the p < 0.05 level, NS non-significant.
Figure 1Malondialdehyde (MDA) fold before (Pre) and after (Post) extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in (A) male and (B) female patients.
Figure 2Ketone fold rates before (Pre) and after (Post) extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in (A) male and (B) female patients.
Figure 3Malondialdehyde (MDA) fold rate as a function of energy level in (A) male and (B) female patients.
Figure 4Correlation of ketone fold rates with body mass index (BMI, abdominal fat) in (A) male and (B) female patients.
Figure 5Ketone fold rate as a function of energy level in (A) male and (B) female patients.
Figure 6Ketone fold rates increase exponentially with energy level in male patients (A) and with body mass index (BMI) in female patients (B).