Literature DB >> 19254396

Impact of obesity on ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy of urinary tract calculi.

Ricardo Natalin1, Keith Xavier, Zephaniah Okeke, Mantu Gupta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The treatment of urinary tract stones in obese patients may differ from the treatment of non-obese patients and their success rate varies. Our objective was to compare ureteroscopic treatment outcomes of ureteral and renal stones, stratified for stone size and location, between overweight, obese and non-obese patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charts were reviewed for 500 consecutive patients presenting at our institution for renal and ureteral stones. A total of 107 patients underwent flexible or semi-rigid ureteroscopy with Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy and met criteria for review and analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, initial stone-free rates were 91%, 97%, and 94% in normal, overweight and obese individuals respectively. When compared to non-obese patients, there were no significant differences (p value = 0.26; 0.50). For renal and proximal ureteral stones, the stone-free rate in overweight and obese individuals was 94% in both groups; and a stone-free rate of 100% was found for distal stones, also in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Ureteroscopic treatment of stones in obese and overweight patients is an acceptable treatment modality, with success rates similar to non-obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19254396     DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382009000100006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  9 in total

1.  Effectiveness of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery in obese patients.

Authors:  O G Doluoglu; T Karakan; M Kabar; B C Ozgur; A M Hascicek; E Huri; B Resorlu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Obesity and Kidney Stone Procedures.

Authors:  Nikhi P Singh; Carter J Boyd; William Poore; Kyle Wood; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2020

Review 3.  Urinary stone disease and obesity: Different pathologies sharing common biochemical mechanisms.

Authors:  Ozgu Aydogdu
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-06

Review 4.  Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances.

Authors:  Guido Giusti; Silvia Proietti; Roberto Peschechera; Gianluigi Taverna; Giuseppe Sortino; Luca Cindolo; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Randomized comparison of 4.5/6 Fr versus 6/7.5 Fr ureteroscopes for laser lithotripsy of lower/middle ureteral calculi: towards optimization of efficacy and safety of semirigid ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Mohamed Omar; Mohammed Dorrah; Ahmed Khalifa; Eid El Sherif; Khalid Sayedahmed; Yahya Ghazwani; Yasser A Noureldin
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Does morbid obesity influence the success and complication rates of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones?

Authors:  Onur Dede; Nevzat Can Şener; Okan Baş; Gülay Dede; Muhammet Şahin Bağbancı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

7.  Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Renal Pelvis Stones of 10-20 mm in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Babak Javanmard; Mohammad Reza Razaghi; Anahita Ansari Jafari; Mohammad Mohsen Mazloomfard
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-27

8.  Ureteroscopy Is Equally Efficient and Safe in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; XiaoShuai Gao; Liao Peng; Tao Jin
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-18

9.  Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, with modified position of the machine head in the treatment of lower calyceal stones in obese patients.

Authors:  Mohamed Abou-Farha; Ahmed El-Abd; Tarek Gameel; Hassan Eltatawy; Salah Nagla
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2022-01-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.