Literature DB >> 20921336

Volumetric breast density from full-field digital mammograms and its association with breast cancer risk factors: a comparison with a threshold method.

Mariëtte Lokate1, Michiel G J Kallenberg, Nico Karssemeijer, Maurice A A J Van den Bosch, Petra H M Peeters, Carla H Van Gils.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Breast density, a strong breast cancer risk factor, is usually measured on the projected breast area from film screen mammograms. This is far from ideal, as breast thickness and technical characteristics are not taken into account. We investigated whether volumetric density measurements on full-field digital mammography (FFDM) are more strongly related to breast cancer risk factors than measurements with a computer-assisted threshold method.
METHODS: Breast density was measured on FFDMs from 370 breast cancer screening participants, using a computer-assisted threshold method and a volumetric method. The distribution of breast cancer risk factors among quintiles of density was compared between both methods. We adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) with linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: High percent density was strongly related to younger age, lower BMI, nulliparity, late age at first delivery and pre/perimenopausal status, to the same extent with both methods (all P < 0.05). Similarly strong relationships were seen for the absolute dense area but to a lesser extent for absolute dense volume. A larger dense volume was only significantly associated with late age at menopause, use of menopausal hormone therapy, and, in contrast to the other methods, high BMI.
CONCLUSION: Both methods related equally well to known breast cancer risk factors. IMPACT: Despite its alleged higher precision, the volumetric method was not more strongly related to breast cancer risk factors. This is in agreement with other studies. The definitive relationship with breast cancer risk still needs to be investigated. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921336     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  27 in total

1.  Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by adiposity: an analysis of four case-control studies.

Authors:  Shannon M Conroy; Christy G Woolcott; Karin R Koga; Celia Byrne; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon; Martin J Yaffe; Ian Pagano; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.

Authors:  Said Pertuz; Elizabeth S McDonald; Susan P Weinstein; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The effect of change in body mass index on volumetric measures of mammographic density.

Authors:  Vicki Hart; Katherine W Reeves; Susan R Sturgeon; Nicholas G Reich; Lynnette Leidy Sievert; Karla Kerlikowske; Lin Ma; John Shepherd; Jeffrey A Tice; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Serghei Malkov; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Travis Johnson; Muqing Lin; Huy Q Le; Justin L Ducote; Min-Ying Su; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Volumetric breast density measurement: sensitivity analysis of a relative physics approach.

Authors:  Susie Lau; Kwan Hoong Ng; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Current and Future Methods for Measuring Breast Density: A Brief Comparative Review.

Authors:  Mark A Sak; Peter J Littrup; Neb Duric; Maeve Mullooly; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Breast Cancer Manag       Date:  2015-08-28

7.  Comparison of mammographic density assessed as volumes and areas among women undergoing diagnostic image-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Berta M Geller; John A Shepherd; Deesha A Patel; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; Rachael E Chicoine; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Bo Fan; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Jeff Wang; Jason M Johnson; Sally D Herschorn; Louise A Brinton; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Baseline mammographic breast density and the risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women participating in the NSABP study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR).

Authors:  Reena S Cecchini; Joseph P Costantino; Jane A Cauley; Walter M Cronin; D Lawrence Wickerham; Hanna Bandos; Joel L Weissfeld; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-10-11

9.  Racial Differences in Quantitative Measures of Area and Volumetric Breast Density.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Brad M Keller; Lauren M Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Marie Synnestvedt; Emily F Conant; Katrina Armstrong; Despina Kontos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Relationship of serum estrogens and metabolites with area and volume mammographic densities.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Deesha A Patel; Roni T Falk; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Berta M Geller; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; Rachael E Chicoine; John A Shepherd; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Jeff Wang; Bo Fan; Sally D Herschorn; Xia Xu; Timothy Veenstra; Barbara Fuhrman; Mark E Sherman; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.869

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.