Literature DB >> 16284389

Measurements of breast density: no ratio for a ratio.

Gerco Haars1, Paulus A H van Noord, Carla H van Gils, Diederick E Grobbee, Petra H M Peeters.   

Abstract

Breast density, as visible on mammograms, is generally assessed as the occupied percentage of the breast and is a risk factor for breast cancer. Various studies have looked into the causation and alteration of relative density but the relation of a determinant with a relative measure does not allow a direct etiologic interpretation. It was our goal to compare the effects of known determinants on relative density and the absolute amounts of dense and nondense tissues. We measured the absolute and relative densities in a population of 418 postmenopausal women participating in a breast cancer screening program. The occupied surface area was calculated after manually tracing the contours of the tissues on digitized mammograms. Information on determinants was available through physical examination and questionnaires. Data were analyzed by multivariate linear regression. Age and parity were found to decrease the amount of dense tissue and the ages at menarche and menopause were found to increase it (R(2) = 13%). The amount of nondense tissue was increased by higher body mass index (BMI), age, and parity (R(2) = 43%). Relative density was affected by a combination of these factors (R(2) = 29%) with directionalities of effects that are comparable to those of dense tissue. However, the magnitudes of these effects were the resultant of the effects on dense and nondense tissues. The influence of BMI on relative density was completely due to an effect on nondense tissue. Although relative density is a relevant prognostic factor, inferences about the etiology of breast density should be made on the basis of absolute measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16284389     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  52 in total

1.  Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by adiposity: an analysis of four case-control studies.

Authors:  Shannon M Conroy; Christy G Woolcott; Karin R Koga; Celia Byrne; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon; Martin J Yaffe; Ian Pagano; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  The effect of change in body mass index on volumetric measures of mammographic density.

Authors:  Vicki Hart; Katherine W Reeves; Susan R Sturgeon; Nicholas G Reich; Lynnette Leidy Sievert; Karla Kerlikowske; Lin Ma; John Shepherd; Jeffrey A Tice; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Serghei Malkov; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Prognostic value of mammographic breast density in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Shereef Elsamany; Abdullah Alzahrani; Seham Abd Elkhalik; Omaima Elemam; Elham Rawah; Mian U Farooq; Musab H Almatrafi; Feras K Olayan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Longitudinal Changes in Volumetric Breast Density in Healthy Women across the Menopausal Transition.

Authors:  Natalie J Engmann; Christopher Scott; Matthew R Jensen; Stacey J Winham; Lin Ma; Kathleen R Brandt; Amir Mahmoudzadeh; Dana H Whaley; Carrie B Hruska; Fang-Fang Wu; Aaron D Norman; Robert A Hiatt; John Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 Women.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Jafi A Lipson; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Martin J Yaffe; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Valerie McGuire; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods.

Authors:  Zoe Aitken; Valerie A McCormack; Ralph P Highnam; Lisa Martin; Anoma Gunasekara; Olga Melnichouk; Gord Mawdsley; Chris Peressotti; Martin Yaffe; Norman F Boyd; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Choice of management of southern Chinese BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Ava Kwong; Connie H N Wong; Catherine Shea; Dacita T K Suen; Catherine L Y Choi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Mammographic density reduction is a prognostic marker of response to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Keith Humphreys; Louise Eriksson; Gustaf Edgren; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Mammographic density and markers of socioeconomic status: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zoe Aitken; Kate Walker; Bernardine H Stegeman; Petra A Wark; Sue M Moss; Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to mammographic density: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Francesmary Modugno; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.