Yanchun Zhu1,2, Xin Cheng1,3, Yajun Ma1,4, Jonathan H Wong1,4, Yaoqin Xie2, Jiang Du1, Eric Y Chang4. 1. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, California, USA. 2. Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academic of Science, Shenzhen, China. 3. Department of Histology and Embryology, Jinan University School of Medicine, Guangzhou, China. 4. Radiology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tendons (RCTs) are challenging to image due to the "magic angle effect" and their short T2 . PURPOSE: To assess the degree of magic angle sensitivity of human RCTs and to utilize a 3D ultrashort echo time Cones sequence with magnetization transfer preparation (UTE-Cones-MT) and two-pool quantitative MT modeling with histological correlation. We hypothesized that MT parameters would be less sensitive to the magic angle compared with conventional T2 measurements. STUDY TYPE: Prospective imaging pathologic correlation. SPECIMEN: Twenty cadaveric rotator cuff tendons were imaged at five sample orientations ranging from 0-90° relative to the B0 field. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T/3D UTE-Cones-MT and Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG). ASSESSMENT: Two-pool quantitative MT modeling parameters and T2 values were calculated in regions of interest drawn by a medical physicist. Histopathological analysis was performed and mild and severe tendinopathy groups were assigned by a histopathologist and histotechnician. STATISTICAL TESTS: Coefficients of variations (CVs) were calculated for measures between the different orientations and group means were compared for each measure. RESULTS: CVs of T2 and macromolecular fractions between orientations were 26.14 ± 16.82% and 6.18 ± 2.77% (mean ± SD), respectively. T2 measurements at 0°, 27°, 70°, and 90° showed significant differences between the two histological groups (P = 0.004, 0.008, 0.003, and 0.015, respectively), but not at 55° (P = 0.611). Mean T2 value ranges between orientations for the mild and severe tendinopathy groups were 15.27-30.32 msec and 20.81-35.85 msec, respectively, showing overlap despite statistically significant differences (P = 0.003). Macromolecular fractions at all angles showed significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.0001). Mean fraction ranges between orientations for the mild and severe tendinopathy groups were 14.32-17.17% and 10.00-13.75% respectively (P < 0.0001) with no overlap. DATA CONCLUSION: Compared with T2 , macromolecular fraction obtained with the 3D UTE-Cones-MT technique is resistant to the magic angle effect and is more sensitive to RCT degeneration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017.
BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tendons (RCTs) are challenging to image due to the "magic angle effect" and their short T2 . PURPOSE: To assess the degree of magic angle sensitivity of human RCTs and to utilize a 3D ultrashort echo time Cones sequence with magnetization transfer preparation (UTE-Cones-MT) and two-pool quantitative MT modeling with histological correlation. We hypothesized that MT parameters would be less sensitive to the magic angle compared with conventional T2 measurements. STUDY TYPE: Prospective imaging pathologic correlation. SPECIMEN: Twenty cadaveric rotator cuff tendons were imaged at five sample orientations ranging from 0-90° relative to the B0 field. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T/3D UTE-Cones-MT and Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG). ASSESSMENT: Two-pool quantitative MT modeling parameters and T2 values were calculated in regions of interest drawn by a medical physicist. Histopathological analysis was performed and mild and severe tendinopathy groups were assigned by a histopathologist and histotechnician. STATISTICAL TESTS: Coefficients of variations (CVs) were calculated for measures between the different orientations and group means were compared for each measure. RESULTS: CVs of T2 and macromolecular fractions between orientations were 26.14 ± 16.82% and 6.18 ± 2.77% (mean ± SD), respectively. T2 measurements at 0°, 27°, 70°, and 90° showed significant differences between the two histological groups (P = 0.004, 0.008, 0.003, and 0.015, respectively), but not at 55° (P = 0.611). Mean T2 value ranges between orientations for the mild and severe tendinopathy groups were 15.27-30.32 msec and 20.81-35.85 msec, respectively, showing overlap despite statistically significant differences (P = 0.003). Macromolecular fractions at all angles showed significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.0001). Mean fraction ranges between orientations for the mild and severe tendinopathy groups were 14.32-17.17% and 10.00-13.75% respectively (P < 0.0001) with no overlap. DATA CONCLUSION: Compared with T2 , macromolecular fraction obtained with the 3D UTE-Cones-MT technique is resistant to the magic angle effect and is more sensitive to RCT degeneration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017.
Authors: Panu T Vesanen; Koos C J Zevenhoven; Jaakko O Nieminen; Juhani Dabek; Lauri T Parkkonen; Risto J Ilmoniemi Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2013-07-27 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Richard J Hodgson; Robert Evans; Peter Wright; Andrew J Grainger; Philip J O'Connor; Philip Helliwell; Dennis McGonagle; Paul Emery; Matthew D Robson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Adam W Anz; Erin P Lucas; Eric K Fitzcharles; Rachel K Surowiec; Peter J Millett; Charles P Ho Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Jessica A Cross; Brian J Cole; Kaylan P Spatny; Emily Sundman; Anthony A Romeo; Greg P Nicholson; Bettina Wagner; Lisa A Fortier Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Behnam Namiranian; Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Erik W Dorthe; Amir Masoud-Afsahi; Jonathan Wong; Zhao Wei; Yanjun Chen; Darryl D'Lima; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: J Biomech Date: 2020-10-24 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Takehito Hananouchi; Yajun Ma; Behnam Namiranian; Erik W Dorthe; Jonathan H Wong; Niloofar Shojaeiadib; Mei Wu; Jiang Du; Darryl D'Lima; Christine B Chung; Eric Y Chang Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Mei Wu; Wei Zhao; Lidi Wan; Lena Kakos; Liang Li; Saeed Jerban; Hyungseok Jang; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du; Ya-Jun Ma Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Tan Guo; Ya-Jun Ma; Rachel A High; Qingbo Tang; Jonathan H Wong; Michal Byra; Adam C Searleman; Sarah C To; Lidi Wan; Nicole Le; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 3.528