Literature DB >> 34717490

Reducing interaural tonotopic mismatch preserves binaural unmasking in cochlear implant simulations of single-sided deafness.

Elad Sagi1, Mahan Azadpour1, Jonathan Neukam1, Nicole Hope Capach1, Mario A Svirsky1.   

Abstract

Binaural unmasking, a key feature of normal binaural hearing, can refer to the improved intelligibility of masked speech by adding masking that facilitates perceived separation of target and masker. A question relevant for cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness (SSD-CI) is whether binaural unmasking can still be achieved if the additional masking is spectrally degraded and shifted. CIs restore some aspects of binaural hearing to these listeners, although binaural unmasking remains limited. Notably, these listeners may experience a mismatch between the frequency information perceived through the CI and that perceived by their normal hearing ear. Employing acoustic simulations of SSD-CI with normal hearing listeners, the present study confirms a previous simulation study that binaural unmasking is severely limited when interaural frequency mismatch between the input frequency range and simulated place of stimulation exceeds 1-2 mm. The present study also shows that binaural unmasking is largely retained when the input frequency range is adjusted to match simulated place of stimulation, even at the expense of removing low-frequency information. This result bears implications for the mechanisms driving the type of binaural unmasking of the present study and for mapping the frequency range of the CI speech processor in SSD-CI users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34717490      PMCID: PMC8637719          DOI: 10.1121/10.0006446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  60 in total

1.  Release from speech-on-speech masking by adding a delayed masker at a different location.

Authors:  Brad Rakerd; Neil L Aaronson; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  L A J Reiss; C W Turner; S A Karsten; B J Gantz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Nandini Iyer; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Redundant Information Is Sometimes More Beneficial Than Spatial Information to Understand Speech in Noise.

Authors:  Benjamin Dieudonné; Tom Francart
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The Sound Quality of Cochlear Implants: Studies With Single-sided Deaf Patients.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Sarah Cook Natale; Austin M Butts; Daniel M Zeitler; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing.

Authors:  Chin-Tuan Tan; Brett Martin; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Release of masking for speech through interaural time delay.

Authors:  R Carhart; T W Tillman; K R Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Bilateral cochlear implants with large asymmetries in electrode insertion depth: implications for the study of auditory plasticity.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Elad Sagi; E Katelyn Glassman
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; Matthew J Goupell; Nathaniel J Spencer; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.

Authors:  Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Roland Laszig; Rainer Beck; Christian Schild; Stefanie Kroeger; Gabriele Ihorst; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for Fitting Cochlear Implants Bimodally and to the Single-Sided Deaf.

Authors:  Sabrina H Pieper; Noura Hamze; Stefan Brill; Sabine Hochmuth; Mats Exter; Marek Polak; Andreas Radeloff; Michael Buschermöhle; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.