Andrew J Zele1, Beatrix Feigl2,3, Pradeep K Kambhampati4, Amithavikram R Hathibelagal5, Jan Kremers6. 1. Visual Science Laboratory, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. andrew.zele@qut.edu.au. 2. Medical Retina Laboratory, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. b.feigl@qut.edu.au. 3. Queensland Eye Institute, South Brisbane, Australia. b.feigl@qut.edu.au. 4. Medical Retina Laboratory, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 5. Visual Science Laboratory, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 6. Laboratory for Retinal Physiology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. jan.kremers@uk-erlangen.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a signal processing paradigm for extracting ERG responses to temporal sinusoidal modulation with contrasts ranging from below perceptual threshold to suprathreshold contrasts and estimate the magnitude of intrinsic noise in ERG signals at different stimulus contrasts. METHODS: Photopic test stimuli were generated using a 4-primary Maxwellian view optical system. The 4-primary lights were sinusoidally temporally modulated in-phase (36 Hz; 2.5-50% Michelson contrast). The stimuli were presented in 1-s epochs separated by a 1-ms blank interval and repeated 160 times (160.160-s duration) during the recording of the continuous flicker ERG from the right eye using DTL fibre electrodes. After artefact rejection, the ERG signal was extracted using Fourier transforms in each of the 1-s epochs where a stimulus was presented. The signal processing allows for computation of the intrinsic noise distribution in addition to the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio. RESULTS: We provide the initial report that the ERG intrinsic noise distribution is independent of stimulus contrast, whereas SNR decreases linearly with decreasing contrast until the noise limit at ~2.5%. The 1-ms blank intervals between epochs de-correlated the ERG signal at the line frequency (50 Hz) and thus increased the SNR of the averaged response. We confirm that response amplitude increases linearly with stimulus contrast. The phase response shows a shallow positive relationship with stimulus contrast. CONCLUSIONS: This new technique will enable recording of intrinsic noise in ERG signals above and below perceptual visual threshold and is suitable for measurement of continuous rod and cone ERGs across a range of temporal frequencies, and post-receptoral processing in the primary retinogeniculate pathways at low stimulus contrasts. The intrinsic noise distribution may have application as a biomarker for detecting changes in disease progression or treatment efficacy.
PURPOSE: To develop a signal processing paradigm for extracting ERG responses to temporal sinusoidal modulation with contrasts ranging from below perceptual threshold to suprathreshold contrasts and estimate the magnitude of intrinsic noise in ERG signals at different stimulus contrasts. METHODS: Photopic test stimuli were generated using a 4-primary Maxwellian view optical system. The 4-primary lights were sinusoidally temporally modulated in-phase (36 Hz; 2.5-50% Michelson contrast). The stimuli were presented in 1-s epochs separated by a 1-ms blank interval and repeated 160 times (160.160-s duration) during the recording of the continuous flicker ERG from the right eye using DTL fibre electrodes. After artefact rejection, the ERG signal was extracted using Fourier transforms in each of the 1-s epochs where a stimulus was presented. The signal processing allows for computation of the intrinsic noise distribution in addition to the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio. RESULTS: We provide the initial report that the ERG intrinsic noise distribution is independent of stimulus contrast, whereas SNR decreases linearly with decreasing contrast until the noise limit at ~2.5%. The 1-ms blank intervals between epochs de-correlated the ERG signal at the line frequency (50 Hz) and thus increased the SNR of the averaged response. We confirm that response amplitude increases linearly with stimulus contrast. The phase response shows a shallow positive relationship with stimulus contrast. CONCLUSIONS: This new technique will enable recording of intrinsic noise in ERG signals above and below perceptual visual threshold and is suitable for measurement of continuous rod and cone ERGs across a range of temporal frequencies, and post-receptoral processing in the primary retinogeniculate pathways at low stimulus contrasts. The intrinsic noise distribution may have application as a biomarker for detecting changes in disease progression or treatment efficacy.
Keywords:
4-primary photostimulator; Electroretinogram (ERG); Noise; Signal to noise
Authors: Daphne L McCulloch; Michael F Marmor; Mitchell G Brigell; Ruth Hamilton; Graham E Holder; Radouil Tzekov; Michael Bach Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2014-12-14 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Antonia La Mancusa; Folkert K Horn; Jan Kremers; Cord Huchzermeyer; Michael Rudolph; Anselm Jünemann Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jan Kremers; Anderson Raiol Rodrigues; Luiz Carlos de Lima Silveira; Manoel da Silva Filho Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Arthur F Resende; Carina T Sanvicente; Hamoon Eshraghi; Alberto Garcia; Kassandra Pickel; Qiang Zhang; Michael Waisbourd; L Jay Katz Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: P Monsalve; S Ren; G Triolo; L Vazquez; A D Henderson; M Kostic; P Gordon; W J Feuer; V Porciatti Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2018-05-19 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Andrew J Zele; Beatrix Feigl; Pradeep K Kambhampati; Avinash Aher; Declan McKeefry; Neil Parry; John Maguire; Ian Murray; Jan Kremers Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 3.283